Author Topic: Lousy call  (Read 1247 times)

Offline FiLtH

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6448
Lousy call
« on: October 12, 2005, 10:10:17 PM »
Inning was over

~AoM~

Offline B17Skull12

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3839
Lousy call
« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2005, 10:11:34 PM »
****ing ***** bellybutton dumb**** umpires need to learn to watch the ****ing big screen.

4 letter word can't decibe those ***** bellybutton umpires.:mad:
II/JG3 DGS II

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Lousy call
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2005, 10:26:20 PM »
Ya know... Baseball has had ample opportunity to use technology to improve the officiating and to take the umpires out of the game.

... but the umpires won't have any of it.
sand

Offline nirvana

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5640
Lousy call
« Reply #3 on: October 12, 2005, 10:27:29 PM »
Not every can afford AH2 Sandy, thus they need something else to do.
Who are you to wave your finger?

Offline majic

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1538
Lousy call
« Reply #4 on: October 12, 2005, 11:09:41 PM »
Did anyone else notice on the slo-mo closeup replay that FOX showed, it did, in fact, bounce?  I thought it was caught until they showed that one.  Weird that they didn't show it again, and the announcers did not acknowledge that.

Offline FiLtH

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6448
Lousy call
« Reply #5 on: October 13, 2005, 02:05:16 AM »
With todays technology they could have sensors in the plate, the ball, the bases, and the gloves to show everything.  Atleast in the ball and plate.

~AoM~

Offline Debonair

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3488
Lousy call
« Reply #6 on: October 13, 2005, 03:06:57 AM »
I get the idea that I would be unpopular if I suggested that on a close play in a postseason game, the catcher might have thrown to first just to make sure, so I wont.

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Lousy call
« Reply #7 on: October 13, 2005, 03:54:11 AM »
It seems to me that a ball in the dirt at the catcher's mitt is out of the strike zone.

Calling a ball 'strike three' was a bad call, calling it a dropped strike three was a bad call.

Had no bad calls been made, Pirsen...  Pearzin... the batter would have been on first with a walk.  2 bad calls cancel each other, the harmony of the cosmos is maintained.
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Lousy call
« Reply #8 on: October 13, 2005, 07:45:37 AM »
The ump stands BEHIND the catcher, he couldn't see that the catcher actually trapped the ball, trapping the ball in the dirt is considered a drop. The first base ump saw it, and called it correctly. (shrugs) Thats my opinion and I'm sticking to it!

Offline slimm50

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2684
Lousy call
« Reply #9 on: October 13, 2005, 08:11:20 AM »
Meanwhihle, my Astros were pwnd.:(

Offline majic

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1538
Lousy call
« Reply #10 on: October 13, 2005, 08:28:47 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Holden McGroin
It seems to me that a ball in the dirt at the catcher's mitt is out of the strike zone.

Calling a ball 'strike three' was a bad call, calling it a dropped strike three was a bad call.

Had no bad calls been made, Pirsen...  Pearzin... the batter would have been on first with a walk.  2 bad calls cancel each other, the harmony of the cosmos is maintained.


A. J. swung, so no bad call there.  The Angels catcher should have tagged him on a play where his glove hit the dirt to get the ball.

On another note, Sosh..  Socs...  the Angels manager was all class after the game.

Offline Seraphim

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 527
Lousy call
« Reply #11 on: October 13, 2005, 09:34:05 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by majic
Did anyone else notice on the slo-mo closeup replay that FOX showed, it did, in fact, bounce?  I thought it was caught until they showed that one.  Weird that they didn't show it again, and the announcers did not acknowledge that.


The ball bounced up from the it hitting the bottom of the mitt. If you watch the actual motion of the ball, it's trajectory couldn't have hit the ground, even though it may look like it in a still picture. A catcher can tell if it hits the ground or not, and I believe Paul would've tagged him had he thought there was a chance it hit the ground.

Offline icemaw

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2057
Lousy call
« Reply #12 on: October 13, 2005, 10:39:19 AM »
Angles fan since 1968. The ball was caught! Josh should have tagged the batter period. The Molina bros would have tagged him. Any close call on strike 3 runner gets tagged catching 101. Umps blew it but that dont matter Josh should have tagged the runner. Game over move on look out socks game 3. Let the Thunder sticks roar!
Army of Das Muppets     
Member DFC Furballers INC. If you cant piss with big dogs go run with the pack

Offline Seraphim

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 527
Lousy call
« Reply #13 on: October 13, 2005, 11:08:46 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by icemaw
Angles fan since 1968. The ball was caught! Josh should have tagged the batter period. The Molina bros would have tagged him. Any close call on strike 3 runner gets tagged catching 101. Umps blew it but that dont matter Josh should have tagged the runner. Game over move on look out socks game 3. Let the Thunder sticks roar!


True Ice.
Angels've been hard to beat at home, & they've had the sox number all year. Cant wait.

Offline Chairboy

  • Probation
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8221
      • hallert.net
Lousy call
« Reply #14 on: October 13, 2005, 04:43:58 PM »
SportsByBrooks article on the call: http://sportsbybrooks.com/dougeddings.html
"When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis