Samuel P. Huntington's Clash of Civilizations Part Deux!
Summary: World politics is entering a new phase, in which the great divisions among humankind and the dominating source of international conflict will be cultural. Civilizations-the highest cultural groupings of people-are differentiated from each other by religion, history, language and tradition. These divisions are deep and increasing in importance. From Yugoslavia to the Middle East to Central Asia, the fault lines of civilizations are the battle lines of the future. In this emerging era of cultural conflict the United States must forge alliances with similar cultures and spread its values wherever possible. With alien civilizations the West must be accommodating if possible, but confrontational if necessary. In the final analysis, however, all civilizations will have to learn to tolerate each other.
Of Related Interest
Topics:
Political Systems
Social and Cultural Issues
If Not Civilizations, What? Samuel Huntington Responds to His Critics
By Samuel P. Huntington
Foreign Affairs, November/December 1993
The Modernizing Imperative: Tradition and Change
By Jeane J. Kirkpatrick
Foreign Affairs, September/October 1993
Do Civilizations Hold?
By Albert L. Weeks
Foreign Affairs, September/October 1993
The West Is Best
By Gerard Piel
Foreign Affairs, September/October 1993
Bonds of Civility: Aesthetic Networks and the Political Origins of Japanese Culture
Eiko Ikegami. : Cambridge University Press, 2005.
A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium
Peter J. Katzenstein. : Cornell University Press, 2005.
Ending Empire: Contested Sovereignty and Territorial Partition
Hendrik Spruyt. : Cornell University Press, 2005.
The French Exception
Edited by Emmanuel Godin and Tony Chafer. : Berghahn Books, 2005.
France in Crisis: Welfare, Inequality, and Globalization Since 1980
Timothy B. Smith. : Cambridge University Press, 2005.
THE NEXT PATTERN OF CONFLICT
World politics is entering a new phase, and intellectuals have not hesitated to proliferate visions of what it will be-the end of history, the return of traditional rivalries between nation states, and the decline of the nation state from the conflicting pulls of tribalism and globalism, among others. Each of these visions catches aspects of the emerging reality. Yet they all miss a crucial, indeed a central, aspect of what global politics is likely to be in the coming years.
It is my hypothesis that the fundamental source of conflict in this new world will not be primarily ideological or primarily economic. The great divisions among humankind and the dominating source of conflict will be cultural. Nation states will remain the most powerful actors in world affairs, but the principal conflicts of global politics will occur between nations and groups of different civilizations. The clash of civilizations will dominate global politics. The fault lines between civilizations will be the battle lines of the future.
Conflict between civilizations will be the latest phase in the evolution of conflict in the modern world. For a century and a half after the emergence of the modern international system with the Peace of Westphalia, the conflicts of the Western world were largely among princes-emperors, absolute monarchs and constitutional monarchs attempting to expand their bureaucracies, their armies, their mercantilist economic strength and, most important, the territory they ruled. In the process they created nation states, and beginning with the French Revolution the principal lines of conflict were between nations rather than princes. In 1793, as R. R. Palmer put it, "The wars of kings were over; the wars of peoples had begun." This nineteenth-century pattern lasted until the end of World War I. Then, as a result of the Russian Revolution and the reaction against it, the conflict of nations yielded to the conflict of ideologies, first among communism, fascism-Nazism and liberal democracy, and then between communism and liberal democracy. During the Cold War, this latter conflict became embodied in the struggle between the two superpowers, neither of which was a nation state in the classical European sense and each of which defined its identity in terms of its ideology.
These conflicts between princes, nation states and ideologies were primarily conflicts within Western civilization, "Western civil wars," as William Lind has labeled them. This was as true of the Cold War as it was of the world wars and the earlier wars of the seventeenth, eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. With the end of the Cold War, international politics moves out of its Western phase, and its centerpiece becomes the interaction between the West and non-Western civilizations and among non-Western civilizations. In the politics of civilizations, the peoples and governments of non-Western civilizations no longer remain the objects of history as targets of Western colonialism but join the West as movers and shapers of history.
THE NATURE OF CIVILIZATIONS
During the cold war the world was divided into the First, Second and Third Worlds. Those divisions are ...
Read the rest of the essay:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0684844419?v=glance
