The 109s do feel as if there under modeled, I took a test flight in the 109F4 the other day and it looks beautiful but does feel under modeled compaired to the old one... The G2 still fies wonderfuly! I'm very happy with that, but thats about it with the 109s.
Now the spits are different, I was one of those people saying they needed to cut down the spit performance, the Spit 5 and Seafire were "too" good for being an early war type. Basicly in there accelereation and ability to hold there E, which was way to good for being such a light plane. I like the new spit 5 and Seafire, I fly the seafire in it's new form alot now, even though it's not as good as it once was I like it better now. The Spit 8 isn't bad either, though I've noticed alot of compression problems with it over other spits but it flies wonderfuly! I've always been a huge fan of the Spit 9 and more so the spit 14 even at low alt for it's very high climb rate. But I am one of those people that beleave the spit 16 should be perked. It also seems a little to turnable, with clipped wings I heard speed and roll rate went up but climb and turn rate went down, I hear the stall buzzer all the time in it but I havn't actully put the thing into a full out stall! I'm one of those people that like balance... Even before the new update the spits had turn rate well the 109s had climb, after awhile it evened out to whom was the better pilot. I don't think there evenly matched for that anymore.
I am mostly a Ki-84 flier, alot of people don't like it because they also call it "uber", but it has it's weak points, mostly in speed!!! Even in that the only way I can beat a spit is in the vertical, and thats mostly with a spit on my 6 until I pull a hammerhead.
I guess my problem is mostly the fact that the game gets boring when all you see everytime you get close to a con is "spit 6K"... Why fly a ww2 flight sim? Why not just build a spit sim?
Edward