Author Topic: Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked  (Read 2922 times)

Offline DipStick

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2157
      • http://www.theblueknights.com
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #15 on: November 19, 2005, 03:27:36 PM »
i liv3 by a purdy big air port. i am t3h ub3r. i no all th3r is 2 no bout planz. perc dat spit.

Offline Golfer

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6314
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #16 on: November 19, 2005, 03:36:54 PM »
.
« Last Edit: November 19, 2005, 04:43:13 PM by Golfer »

Offline Golfer

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6314
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #17 on: November 19, 2005, 03:37:44 PM »
.
« Last Edit: November 19, 2005, 04:43:27 PM by Golfer »

Offline BBQ_Bob

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 892
      • http://uknightedstates.net
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #18 on: November 19, 2005, 03:38:56 PM »
I would have said "STFU" :furious
UKNIGHTED Propaganda Minister
"There are no Hells Angels in the MA, never"

"they are nowhere near the airport ..they are lost in the desert...they can not read a compass...they are retarded."

For a good time ~~ www.uknightedstates.net

Offline Morpheus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10224
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #19 on: November 19, 2005, 03:41:28 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Golfer
But hey...you say yourself it's an internet BBs and there are no feelings involved.  I have to side with Mechanic on that one.

No double standards, homey.


where was I expressing my feelings you trolling tard?

I said what a wanted to say and that was it. Me expressing my feelings would be telling you that you absolutely suck at song writing lol. Then I would be expressing some feelings.

if he's going to compare a spit16 to an aerobatic plane such as a Pitts he's a fool, and you're a bigger one if you're going to take his side. Double standards? ROFL, yeah.


And one more thing, if you want to side with some kid who dresses up as a clown and dates 14 year olds, that's your problem, not mine.
« Last Edit: November 19, 2005, 03:43:49 PM by Morpheus »
If you don't receive Jesus Christ, you don't receive the gift of righteousness.

Be A WARRIOR NOT A WORRIER!

Offline BigR

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 950
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #20 on: November 19, 2005, 03:42:57 PM »
The kill ratios are misleading. LA7s and Nikis are flown in a more BnZ style for the most part. Make a pass,  and run away. The spit16 is being flown on the deck, in furballs. Make no mistake..the Spit16 in this game is a MUCH better plane than a Nik or LA7. The spit turns mediocre pilots into killers....in a furball...not just BnZ like the Nik and LA. Its ability to reverse is my biggest beef with it. Its such a monster...it can slow down, cause bad overshoots and then it has so much horsepower that it can recover instantly. It doesn’t really turn that well actually, but it doesn’t have to....you can reverse so much in it, the average person will not even be able to keep track of you.  Its like a Zeke minus the turning ability, but with a ton more horsepower.

I have only flown that plane in furballs, and have a 3 to 1 K/D. Now, my SA is terrible, and there’s no way I could fly any other plane as carelessly as I fly the Spit16, and still maintain that ratio.

Should it be perked? I dont know...maybe a little. The silly thing is some of the planes that are perked are not nearly as good and are totally outclassed by the 16. The Spit14 and TA152 come to mind. The CHog should be unperked as well. Either that, or the 16 should be perked and made more expensive than those 3 planes.

Offline BBQ_Bob

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 892
      • http://uknightedstates.net
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #21 on: November 19, 2005, 03:50:58 PM »
Hey let's explore the Dressing up as a Clown part again.
UKNIGHTED Propaganda Minister
"There are no Hells Angels in the MA, never"

"they are nowhere near the airport ..they are lost in the desert...they can not read a compass...they are retarded."

For a good time ~~ www.uknightedstates.net

Offline Morpheus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10224
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #22 on: November 19, 2005, 03:57:03 PM »
Its simple really, the clown embodies the true meaning of his life. One big joke. :)
If you don't receive Jesus Christ, you don't receive the gift of righteousness.

Be A WARRIOR NOT A WORRIER!

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #23 on: November 19, 2005, 04:01:55 PM »
God dangit! I WANT MY 2 MINUTES BACK!!!

That's how much time I wasted reading the crap on this thread


(*walks away, shaking head, muttering under breath*)

Offline killnu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3056
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #24 on: November 19, 2005, 04:02:46 PM »
somebodys time of the day i see.:eek:
Karma, it follows you every where you go...

++The Blue Knights++

Offline bozon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6037
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #25 on: November 19, 2005, 04:19:18 PM »
spit 16 must be perked.
The spit 14 is perked right? and spit 16 has even a HIGHER version number!

Besides, there were less spit 16 with beads seat cover produced than 262s with rabit-foot key holders and those are perked.

Bozon
Mosquito VI - twice the spitfire, four times the ENY.

Click!>> "So, you want to fly the wooden wonder" - <<click!
the almost incomplete and not entirely inaccurate guide to the AH Mosquito.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGOWswdzGQs

Offline Golfer

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6314
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #26 on: November 19, 2005, 04:27:31 PM »
.
« Last Edit: November 19, 2005, 04:43:43 PM by Golfer »

Offline Morpheus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10224
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #27 on: November 19, 2005, 04:27:33 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by bozon
spit 16 must be perked.
The spit 14 is perked right? and spit 16 has even a HIGHER version number!


Bozon
:lol :aok
If you don't receive Jesus Christ, you don't receive the gift of righteousness.

Be A WARRIOR NOT A WORRIER!

Offline Morpheus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10224
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #28 on: November 19, 2005, 04:29:06 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Golfer
Not trolling...

I'm not saying he is or isn't a fool, oh eloquent king of wit.

I'm not taking his side about which airplane is better and why...but going back to your monster troll which you yourself stated it's just a BBs and thus not emotional.  Name calling is getting emotional.  I'm siding with him that pushing someone's buttons 'just because you can' should bring a little bit of a penalty.  Do it in a bar...get in a fight.  Do it on here behind the protection of a monitor in his case an ocean away...juvenile.

I'm suggesting holding yourself to a higher standard rather than rolling in the mud...but if that's what floats your boat who am I to say you're wrong.

Make up your mind.


lol so very true. For it was he who told me he was going to "Puffy my eye and deal with me like all the rest". :lol

I find it enjoyable in some twisted way to call him out on his bs little lies. Such as his oath to never post on the BB again. Which turned into never posting in the General ever again.  Or his oath to never respond to me again. LOL. Oh the joy.:D

I would never want him to stop posting here. For it is him in my presence that makes me feel that much better about being me.
« Last Edit: November 19, 2005, 04:32:33 PM by Morpheus »
If you don't receive Jesus Christ, you don't receive the gift of righteousness.

Be A WARRIOR NOT A WORRIER!

Offline Golfer

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6314
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #29 on: November 19, 2005, 04:32:25 PM »
.
« Last Edit: November 19, 2005, 04:44:00 PM by Golfer »