I think mainly due to remaining with the status quo of financial sucess, I don't blame them but t is as such.
It is always HTC's goal that planes perform like the real thing.
HTC Never modiefies a planes performance based on anything but our best interpitation of the flight data we have availible to us.
We do not have a bias towards any countries planes.
There are generic systems we use that people then try turn into we have a bias.
These include things like flaps.We make generic modeling choices on how to impliment certain systesm Thinks like, do flaps move to any position or do they have preset positions. These have absolutly nothing to do with a bias.We could model all types of flaps systems, but does it realy make much different to the plane.
People who tend to do reaserch on flight data tend to cheary pick the data. This is typicly because the plane they are researching is a plane they have always liked. I.E. on the FW performance being to slow comes from one report, but they wish to use another report with a better climb rate.
People also tend to belive that there is one set of golden /(Compltly real) numbers on the performance of an airplane. This is far from reality.
Finaly It always amazes me, how people clame things changed, with the 109s this version none of there performance changed. The 109k4 perfomes exatly like the 109G10 did.
The F190D9 has not changed since 2.00 was released. So have you ever flown since 2.00 wilbus or are you refering to pre 2.00 dora?
HiTech
