Keep these articles coming, guys! I find that Ameritard paranoia is one of the funniest things on this board!
Originally posted by MrRiplEy[H] An old woman is more likely to shoot herself in the hip or a bystander if she tries to fire on a fast moving dog in a panic. The correct solution to the problem is to force the owners of attack dogs / any large canine to leash the dogs when outside or cage them. There's absolutely no reason why an attack dog should be left to run unleashed in a housing enviroment.
Originally posted by lasersailor184 It is not paranoia to fear packs of dogs when 6 dogs kill an elderly lady.
Originally posted by eagl http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/11/27/woman.mauled.ap/index.htmlAnother needless death that might have been prevented any number of ways. Had she carried a gun, had the guy who tried to help her had a gun, or if dog owners were held more accountable by local authorities for the actions of their dogs BEFORE this sort of thing happens.
Originally posted by nirvana If you read the article, it says the dogs confronted her, she had probably done something to her earlier so it was a revenge attack.
Originally posted by lazs2 curval... your chance of ever needing a seat belt is even slighter than the chance of becoming a victim of a violent crime.... does that mean that people who put on seatbelts are paranoid?
"If more people had concealed carry permits it is possible that someone witnessing the attack could have shot the dogs..
bystanders getting a gun and stopping dog attacks are not that uncommon here. How do you think police stop dog attacks? they shoot.
and GTO... the fastest growing segment of the population that is getting concealed carry permits is..... women.
Originally posted by Curval No, it means they are obeying the law.