First Amentment is a fine line between tasteless and against the law.
Ok, replace Santa with George Bush, maybe more people would get a chuckle.
Now, If this ****** replaced Santa with a replica of his neighbors wife in the same way, would he still be covered by the first amendment? Or would that be considered a terroristic threat? I'm not a Lawyer, nor am I saying if he is covered by the first amendent by hanging santa. Tastless, yes by my standards. First amendment is painted with a broad stoke, and interpeted differently. I understand freedom of speech, but yelling "FIRE" in a movie theater and someone gets hurt, you pay the consequences. I like to see how this plays out. Vigilantees, lawsuits by parents over tramatized kids, etc. etc.
Replace Santa with an African American and I will bet you who shows up at the door within an hour.
So i guess my question would be, Does the first amentment protect the content of what he is hanging? Could just about Anything be placed in the noose and be protected by the first amendment? I, myself don't see this act as religious or anti-religious. Would I be protected to stand next to the line of kids waiting to see Santa, and tell them how he is a fake and their parents really put the gifts under the tree. ( just kidding, if any little kids are reading this) And when i walk away with a bloody nose, could i sue for bodily harm?
NUTTZ
Originally posted by SOB
Why should it make a difference if it's a soldier? Do bigger *******s get less protection under the 1st amendment?