Eagler, I agree with you about "the next mushroom cloud".
But it was an extremely stupid decision to perform this test when the Chairman of the People's Republic of China is in Moscow. For the first time since IIRC 1949. I don't count 1995 50 years of Victory celebrations, it was a visit of honour, nothing else.
They said - 2 warheads!? LOL! They said - telemetry failure!? ROFLMAO!!! YEAH!!! A Confirmed hit!!! 50% probability - it's a real achievement!!!
Muniteman-2?! The very same missile had fallen to Cuba in early-70s after an unsuccessful test-launch. Soviet engineers laughed to tears over that stone-age "hi-tech".
JFYI: USSR performed a first ICBM interception in 1963.
In early-70s, when the ABM treaty was signed, Soviet ABM systems could detect a real warhead in the cloud of false-targets and active jammers, and it was only the first-generation S-225 ABM, that was replaced by a smarter system in early-80s.
I am sorry, but I have to agree with comrade Putin: if US withdrawsfrom ABM treaty - then Russia automaticaly withdraws from all the strategic weapon treaties. We will have only to rearm our ICBMs with separatable warheads. Putin was right: noone will be able to find defence against it in nearest 50-100 years.
Another round of escalation?!
Well. Russia and China do have the guts to face total war, that US fortunately have never seen before. OK. Who'll be the first to press the Red Button?
I understand that the Missile Shield that protects me, here, in Moscow, can intercept no more then 5-10 warheads. It's what my Uncle said, who took part in this Shield development, after scoring 4 victories in Vietnam, and some more in Middle East as a SAM targeting officer. But US have chosen their "missile farm" in North Dakota as a region that will be protected by ABMs.
Maybe it's better to stick to status quo? The world's security is too fragile to play games with it...
The cold war was lost by the Red side 10 years ago.
Please, don't start it over. Don't wake the bear. Especialy the wounded bear.