Author Topic: New Planes Request  (Read 4856 times)

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
New Planes Request
« Reply #45 on: December 29, 2005, 02:10:32 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Phaser11
Is not one model of a Spit or 109 enough?

Is that rhetorical, or do you actually not understand why both the Spit and Bf109 need to have a wide range of models in the game?

B-29A should be added eventually, but the ammount of work it will take for the artists to do it is almost certainly more than all of the Bf109s and all of she Spitfires took combined.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Easyscor

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10917
New Planes Request
« Reply #46 on: December 29, 2005, 08:44:04 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by ramzey
and son, when you use country names use KAPITAL lettter as first
Its Polish Fighter , Italian Fighter, you  handsomehunk
:rofl Wow, the guys makes his very first post and you spank him back into the corner.  Have a bad Christmas ramzey?:D
Easy in-game again.
Since Tour 19 - 2001

Offline 1K3

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3449
New Planes Request
« Reply #47 on: December 30, 2005, 02:19:45 PM »
i heard the J2M3 is the fastest Japanese plane at ground level, is that true?

Offline Panzzer

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2890
New Planes Request
« Reply #48 on: December 30, 2005, 02:26:30 PM »
A plane thread without the Brewster? Unheard of! :)


Brewster Model 239, please.
Panzzer - Lentorykmentti 3

Offline 007Rusty

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2634
New Planes Request
« Reply #49 on: December 30, 2005, 03:35:28 PM »
is that a LW stolen lala???????? hehe :lol
C.O. 444TH AIR MAFIA
 WD40 (FS0)
 

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
New Planes Request
« Reply #50 on: December 30, 2005, 03:45:39 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by 007Rusty
is that a LW stolen lala???????? hehe :lol

No, it is a Brewster 239 in Finnish service, bought from the USA.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline ramzey

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3223
New Planes Request
« Reply #51 on: December 30, 2005, 03:55:55 PM »
thats does not change thing, its pice of crap,  same as PZL P11 for MA or TOD

Offline Panzzer

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2890
New Planes Request
« Reply #52 on: December 30, 2005, 04:26:30 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by ramzey
thats does not change thing, its pice of crap,  same as PZL P11 for MA or TOD
But we still need it in AH. It might be slow and weakly armed, but hey, we have the Hurri1 already.

Or if we don't actually need it, I still do want it in AH... ;)
Panzzer - Lentorykmentti 3

Offline ramzey

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3223
New Planes Request
« Reply #53 on: December 30, 2005, 06:37:12 PM »
just fly F4F

Offline Wofat

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 41
New Planes Request
« Reply #54 on: December 30, 2005, 07:10:45 PM »
Just saw the stats on a J2M3...Wow!

Cannot turn but looks fun.  Thanks for posting.

-W

Offline Nemeth

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 413
      • http://603sqdrn.collectivelyspaced.com/intro.html
New Planes Request
« Reply #55 on: January 10, 2006, 09:25:20 PM »
i have an idea lets put a Canadian plane in AH... yes yes yes i know what u r thinking.... what is he mad!??!! Canadians didnt have any planes!!!  but infact we did canada had the 2nd best bomber of WWII, we had the Halifax heavy bomber... and if u dont belive me look @ this http://www.constable.ca/halifax.htm, btw the stats r there 2

Offline Sikboy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
New Planes Request
« Reply #56 on: January 10, 2006, 09:54:42 PM »
D4Y Judy Judy Judy.



Jus' sayin'



-Sik
« Last Edit: January 10, 2006, 10:02:13 PM by Sikboy »
You: Blah Blah Blah
Me: Meh, whatever.

Offline RAIDER14

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2554
How bout 1 of these
« Reply #57 on: January 10, 2006, 10:23:49 PM »

Crew  7-9  
First flight  1935  
Entered service  1936  
Manufacturer  Consolidated  
Dimensions (PBY-5A)  
Length  63 ft 10 in  19.5 m  
Wingspan  104 ft 0 in  34.7 m  
Height  20 ft 2 in  16.15 m  
Wing area  ft²  m²  
Weights  
Empty  20,910 lb  9,485 kg  
Maximum  35,420 lb  16,099 kg  
Powerplant  
Engines  Two Pratt & Whitney R-1830-92 Twin Wasp radial piston engines  
Power (each)  1200 hp  895 kW  
Performance (PBY-5A)  
Maximum speed  179 mph  288 km/h  
Range  2545 miles  4096 km  
Service ceiling  14,700 ft  4480 m  
Rate of climb  690 ft/min  210 m/min  
Avionics  
Avionics  
Armament  
Guns  2 x 30 cal (7.62 mm) machine guns in nose; 1 x 50 cal (12.7 mm) machine gun in each waist blister  
Bombs  4000 lb (1800 kg) of bombs or depth charges

Offline SAS_KID

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1098
      • http://www.myspace.com/saskid
New Planes Request
« Reply #58 on: January 15, 2006, 02:05:57 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nemeth
i have an idea lets put a Canadian plane in AH... yes yes yes i know what u r thinking.... what is he mad!??!! Canadians didnt have any planes!!!  but infact we did canada had the 2nd best bomber of WWII, we had the Halifax heavy bomber... and if u dont belive me look @ this http://www.constable.ca/halifax.htm, btw the stats r there 2

Lol i think the Canadicans(I know its Canadians)stole a lancaster model and made that...
Quote from: hitech on Today at 09:27:26 AM
What utter and compete BS, quite frankly I should kick you off this bbs for this post.

The real truth is you do not like the answer.

HiTech

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
New Planes Request
« Reply #59 on: January 15, 2006, 02:55:59 AM »
The Halifax was a British bomber built to the same specification as the Lancaster was, P.13/36.  Like the Lancaster it ended up with four engines instead of the two overly complex engines specified in P.13/36.  Unlike the Lancaster the Halifax's designers realized the two engine scheme was not going to work and switched to four engines before it was built.  The Lancaster had to suffer through the dreadful Manchester phase before the excellent Lancaster could emerge.

Like some other British aircraft, the Mosquito for example, it was also built in Canada.

The Halifax has very similar, but slightly inferior, performance to the Lancaster.  It filled the same rolls at the same times.  In that consideration it would bring little to AH while absorbing a disproportianate amount of time for the artists to make it.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-