Author Topic: O'Reilly on Letterman (Read 1683 times)

tapakeg · « **on:** January 16, 2006, 05:29:17 AM »

In case you missed it

hard to be in a liberal audience

DREDIOCK · « **Reply #1 on:** January 16, 2006, 07:33:33 AM »

Reminded me of the O'club

Conversation between two of the worlds largest anal orifices went well untill Letterman ran out of points to make and had to throw insults instead.

"Im not smart enough to debate this point to point with you. But I have the feeling that 60% of what you say is crap"

Mighty1 · « **Reply #2 on:** January 16, 2006, 09:08:28 AM »

Yeah I loved that comment plus his "I've never seen your show but people have told me things".

I like Dave but he is getting caught up in the MSM's BS.

Now don't get me wrong I watch his show but I believe probably 30% of O'Reilly is BS. Sometimes I have to turn him off when he gets to self righteous.

Ripsnort · « **Reply #3 on:** January 16, 2006, 09:24:42 AM »

"welll how do you know its 60% crap if you don't watch it?"

"Well, bill, because of things that I've read..."

Game, Set, Match to O'Reilly.

midnight Target · « **Reply #4 on:** January 16, 2006, 09:37:23 AM »

Yea boy! That reading will screw you up every darn time!

Ripsnort · « **Reply #5 on:** January 16, 2006, 09:42:33 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by midnight Target
Yea boy! That reading will screw you up every darn time!

His sources were probably things such as New York Times, Washington Post...you get my point

Mustaine · « **Reply #6 on:** January 16, 2006, 09:46:08 AM »

there was a time, when i was younger, that i really enjoyed Dave Letterman.

for some reason, he never used to be on such a political soap box, he was just funny, and set himself away from all that...

i just hate it when he gets like this. really makes me bummed out.

midnight Target · « **Reply #7 on:** January 16, 2006, 09:46:15 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Ripsnort
His sources were probably things such as New York Times, Washington Post...you get my point

The point is... you don't know his sources.

Mighty1 · « **Reply #8 on:** January 16, 2006, 09:58:48 AM »

Point is he never even made the attempt to watch his show so how can he honestly say he is 60% crap?

It doesn't matter what his "source" is.

Mickey1992 · « **Reply #9 on:** January 16, 2006, 10:05:13 AM »

I used to love Letterman. Now it seems like more and more he simply seems annoyed having to be there. Sometimes it seems like maybe he is having a bad day, then others it seems like he is just content with coming off as being an bellybutton and he doesn't care.

I remember Carson being like this in the couple of years before he retired. It was like he was on autopilot and if anything did not go exactly to his liking he became a jerk.

VOR · « **Reply #10 on:** January 16, 2006, 10:11:35 AM »

Regardless of the accuracy or bias of his sources, he's apparently let others make his mind up for him.

On a related note, I'd rather get a prostate exam with a rake than watch Letterman or O'Reilly, so I guess that makes me unqualified to determine what percentage of their talking points may or may not be crap.

Hangtime · « **Reply #11 on:** January 16, 2006, 11:06:05 AM »

I saw that.. reminded me of the South Park episode where the kids choices were limited to a giant sweetheart or a terd sandwich.

Holden McGroin · « **Reply #12 on:** January 16, 2006, 11:14:13 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by midnight Target
The point is... you don't know his sources.

When I want to decide if Letterman is funny, I read what other people write rather than watch Letterman.

Yeager · « **Reply #13 on:** January 16, 2006, 12:03:09 PM »

o'reilly ran over letterman like a M1 tank runs over a donkey cart.

I felt really bad for letterman

SOB · « **Reply #14 on:** January 16, 2006, 12:10:02 PM »

Dave should stick to comedy.