Well Rebel, there are many points of view on that.
The US-Castro vendetta started when Castro confiscated US property IN Cuban land and was turned into state-owned stuff. If you read your history you will know the US almost virtually owned more than half of Cuba and were exploiting the sugar and tobbacco fields, taking all the wealth into the US and leaving nearly none for the Cuban economy. Dont argue with me on this, its on any non-biased history book. Go to your local library. The local Cuban government was for all purposes a US puppet, with all high officials receiving huge bonuses for their allowing the US to do all that.
So when the situation got strained to the breaking point and the people revolt and a dictator that kicks the US out is put in power, the US of course does not like it and so begins all this embargo and shtuff thats been going on all this time. And please remember Castro wasn't communist, he was forced to turn to the USSR just to keep the country alive and safe from US invasion.
I do not defend a dictator being in power, I do not like Castro or what he has done. But I do understand the instances that brought this to happen.
Let me also remind you of the words a North Korean leader (a prince I think it was) said after the US increased the embargo restrictions:
"Boycotting a nation only makes the people hungry. It doesn't make people revolt, it just makes them die".
Edited: Interestingly enough, after those restrictions (on heating oil and food I think it was) were put in place, the N. Koreans launched a missile over the US base in Japan... remember that? Well, what the news media did NOT say was that the restrictions were not only LIFTED, but "international aid" was increased tenfold after the N. Koreans agreed to limit their missile development programs. Man that took BALLS to do... I like that prince!
You would think that after 50 years and 2 examples that boycotts and embargos dont work, the US wouldve learned that lesson. Seems they haven't. God knows how much suffering this policy has caused.
What was this thread about again?
[This message has been edited by Tac (edited 09-11-2000).]