Author Topic: China and Russia - "friendship pact"  (Read 1376 times)

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18206
China and Russia - "friendship pact"
« on: January 19, 2001, 08:32:00 AM »
Interesting read:

China-Russia Pact and the New Danger
Christopher Ruddy
Monday, Jan. 15, 2001
Reports that China and Russia are preparing to sign a "friendship pact" should send a chill down your spine.
The signing of such an agreement is a natural outcome of a warming relationship between the two great nations that began more than a decade ago.

The two countries have made clear their reason for the new pact: to challenge the worldwide influence of the United States.

China openly calls the treaty a "strategic partnership" signifying that a new global axis has developed between Moscow and Beijing.

Press dispatches, including one in Sunday’s New York Times, cite a key reason for the closeness between Russia and China. The new Bush administration plans to build a missile defense system.

The new agreement is not an abrupt development. China and Russia have been stepping up economic and military cooperation in recent years, to the point they have been withdrawing troops on their once militarized borders.

Bill Clinton’s 1999 war in Kosovo also ignited old fears of an "imperialist" America and only helped to tighten the ties between Beijing and Moscow.

But recent events may have poured kerosene under the budding fire being kindled between the two nations.

The most important recent development was the election of George Bush.

Bush campaigned on rebuilding U.S. defenses. It was not a politically winning issue, but Bush went out of his way to decry the deplorable condition of our armed forces.

Bill Clinton took steps to cut America’s defenses almost in half during his two terms.

Today, no military man would dare claim the U.S. could, in a timely manner, handle another Gulf War, let alone a major blow up over Taiwan, Korea, Israel or some other hot spot.

I believe our adversaries – the Iranians, Khadafy, Saddam, and, yes, the Russians and Chinese – have kept quiet over the past eight years (have you noticed that?) because they knew they had a fool in the White House.

The last time such a man served in the White House was when Jimmy Carter was president.

But the enemies of the U.S. took advantage of Carter and overplayed their hand. Remember Afghanistan, the Iranian hostage crisis?

Americans realized that Carter was foolish, naïve and dangerous. In 1980 they took to the polls and voted for Reagan-Bush.

By making Carter look bad, America’s adversaries ended up with 12 years of Reagan-Bush military policies. Reagan quickly engaged the nation in the largest peacetime buildup ever.

Apparently, our enemies learned their lesson from the Carter days and figured it would be nice to have a two-term Carter in the person of Bill Clinton. Our enemies made Clinton look good at almost every turn. They almost succeeded with three terms of Carter in the person of Al Gore.

Unfortunately for our adversaries, the American public voted for a change this past November.

While I don’t believe Americans voted for Bush because of national security issues, it is our good fortune that our president-elect truly believes in rebuilding America’s defenses.

We know he believes it because personnel is policy. He picked, for starters, former Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney as his vice president.

Perhaps the most important Cabinet selection was Donald Rumsfeld, another former secretary of defense.

Rumsfeld comes to the Pentagon without having to learn the job. At confirmation hearings last week, Rumsfeld told the Senate Armed Services Committee that building and deploying a missile defense system was his No. 1 priority.

I have only applause – and worry – about this.

First, I believe Ronald Reagan will be remembered as a great prophet for having sought the creation and deployment of a missile defense system. Almost two decades later, however, Reagan’s vision has yet to be fulfilled.

Cleverly, the Clinton administration created high and perhaps impossible standards for their proposed missile defense program. For eight years they sought to sabotage development of the system through every bureaucratic means.

Clinton never wanted the system, and Moscow and Beijing were happy with him for such a policy.

But Bush’s policies are exactly the opposite of Clinton’s.

Since Russia and China have made preventing the development and deployment of such a system the hallmark of their foreign policy toward the U.S. for more than a decade, we can only imagine what actions they may take to stop Bush.

Russia and China, despite all the media spin we hear, have continued to invest heavily in strategic weaponry – nuclear, biological and chemical.

Thanks to Bill Clinton, China was transferred ballistic missile technology that allows them to hit U.S. cities like Los Angeles with pinpoint accuracy.

Most Americans would be surprised to learn that Russia, not the U.S., has the world’s largest nuclear arsenal of strategic and tactical weapons. China has a growing nuclear arsenal and the world’s largest conventional army.

Both countries will not stand idly by as America tries to build a missile defense system. Nor will rogue countries like North Korea and Iran. All parties know that even if the Bush administration were to begin rebuilding America’s defenses tomorrow, it would still take three to five years to see any measurable result, including the development of a practical missile defense system.

This is why the next few years are ominous ones.

Our adversaries know we will be weak for just a little while longer before their window of opportunity will begin to close. The new China-Russia pact should be viewed in that context and with great concern.

Newsmax.com

Eagler
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline Gunthr

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3043
      • http://www.dot.squat
China and Russia - "friendship pact"
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2001, 09:12:00 AM »
Very good size up, Eagler. I posted last year that China has been training for an actual military confrontation with the US because they considered the US to be a major security threat thier country. I hope this new developement really gets the attention it deserves...

Gunthr
"When I speak I put on a mask. When I act, I am forced to take it off."  - Helvetius 18th Century

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18206
China and Russia - "friendship pact"
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2001, 09:13:00 AM »
More info on the matter:
(Colonel Stanislav Lunev is the highest-ranking military officer ever to defect from Russia to the United States. )

Col. Stanislav Lunev
Wednesday, Jan. 17, 2001
At week’s end President-elect Bush will relocate his residence to the White House, nicknamed "Motel 1600" by cynical Washingtonians during recent years when President Clinton and his wife were renting out rooms in return for hefty campaign contributions.
Unlike his predecessor, who inherited a robust economy and the strongest military in the world, Bush has many problems left over from the previous administration to resolve.

Among them is U.S. policy toward Russia, which eight years ago was mostly friendly to the United States, but is no longer, thanks to the flawed Clinton/Gore policies.

The incoming Bush administration may soon find that the present government of the Russian Federation is very different from the previous one, and under President Vladimir Putin his country is heading toward a domestic dictatorship and to the restoration of Soviet Russia’s international influence and domination.

The new people in the White House could also soon find that Putin, who was vigorously promoted by the Clinton-Gore administration as a supporter of democracy and a free-market economy, is, in reality, as aggressive and energetic in his efforts domestically as he is in pursuing an ambitious foreign policy agenda hostile to the U.S. and its allies.

Consolidating state power in Russia and reaping the benefits of skyrocketing oil-gas prices in the international markets, Putin has spent the past several months systematically constructing a framework with which to engage the new U.S. administration. He visited North Korea, Cuba and other old Soviet satellites in an attempt to restore Russia’s relations with former allies that remain hostile to America.

He sent his Security Council Secretary Sergei Ivanov to the Middle East and his Defense Minister Igor Sergeev to Iran, in an effort to restore Moscow’s strategic position and to establish new military ties in violation of agreements signed by Russia’s previous government with the gullible Clinton-Gore administration.

Also in violation of previous Kremlin promises, Putin’s government said recently that Russia "cannot make full payment" of its foreign debt and requested the finance minister to begin negotiations with creditor nations, known collectively as the Paris Club, which includes the U.S.

As Russia’s ORT TV channel said, Russia’s payment in January to the Paris Club will be only about 10 percent of the originally scheduled $316.4 million, because of an alleged "dramatic decline in oil prices at the international market."

Practically ignored by the mainstream American press, this announcement that Russia will miss some first-quarter payments raised serious questions about whether the country’s economic recovery is really as strong as the Kremlin has claimed, and could potentially dampen Putin’s attempts to encourage foreign investment.

In relations with European and other Western countries, the Kremlin is using every opportunity to create a split between the U.S. and its traditional friends and allies.

Most notably, Putin has launched a broad campaign against American plans for a national missile defense (NMD) system, promoting alternative programs that include Russia’s participation, and are especially designed to undermine European public support for the NMD and cause them to challenge their governments’ support of the U.S. defense plans.

Actually there is nothing new in Putin’s tactics – this divide-and-conquer approach was exactly the method that was a favorite practice of the former Soviet leaders in dealing with NATO’s member nations in the days of the Cold War.

During his time in power Putin has worked feverishly to improve the strategic alliance with Red China and to engage India and other countries with anti-American sentiments in a some kind of coalition directed against the U.S. Moscow has already established military cooperation with Byelorussia and Central Asia’s newly independent states, based on the grounds of Russia’s military presence in those countries.

The Russian president also has stepped up pressure on other former Soviet republics, such as Armenia and Georgia, which have Russian military bases on their soil but have nevertheless leaned westward

Using a dispute between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh, Putin has also tried to increase Moscow’s influence in Azerbaijan, the only former Soviet republic in Trans-Caucasus that doesn’t have a Russian military presence on its territory.

On Jan. 10 Putin said he wanted more military cooperation with this Trans-Caucasus country. "Military cooperation between Russia and Azerbaijan has been showing signs of progress lately. I think our contacts in this area may be intensified," Putin told the Azeri Parliament during his first visit to Azerbaijan.

The Russian press said that as a first step Moscow would like to re-establish its control over the Gabalinsky radar station in Azerbaijan, which was an important link in the Soviet integrated system for the national air and missile defense.

As NewsMax.com has reported, under Putin Moscow’s military preparations have increased dramatically. The whole world should be alarmed by re-deployment of Russian tactical nukes to Kaliningrad, which has undermined the global security because it signals a worrisome departure from the previous Moscow policy and a new level of brinkmanship. But it appears as if, from the beginning, the Clinton-Gore team was determined to pass the so-called Kaliningrad crisis on to the next administration.

Recently Moscow has lowered the threshold for nuclear weapons use and increased its reliance on tactical nuclear arms and hidden stocks of germ warfare and poison gas to compensate for its declining conventional forces. As Putin stated in January, his government would use "all forces and means, including nuclear weapons if necessary, to repel armed aggression."

Recent Russian military field exercises used the scenario of a NATO attack on Kaliningrad and allowed participating troops to launch mock nuclear attacks on the Europe and the U.S.

In other words, President Bush and his team may soon find that they inherited from the previous administration some very touchy relationships with Russia, which has successfully resumed alliances with such states as Red China, Iran, Iraq, Libya and Cuba. Putin has built a coalition that will counter the U.S. and try to thwart any American defense initiatives, including such extremely important strategic programs as NMD.

From now on, the future of the U.S. policy vis-a-vis Russia will depend on how well the new American president can handle Clinton’s Russian legacy to his administration – an aggressive and ambitious Russian leader of a still militarily powerful country
_____________________________ ________
You realize together, Russia and China could take the US in our present downgraded military status... thanks billy bob. Isn't social economical repression one of the main reasons you wage a war? Aren't both China and Russia experiencing this now?

Eagler
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline mrfish

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2343
China and Russia - "friendship pact"
« Reply #3 on: January 19, 2001, 09:40:00 AM »
i think it is an economical move- not like they are being threatened - in fact china (cant speak for russia) is booming with private commerce like never before.

i was lucky enough to spend the better half of march 2000 in the southern part of china - gong yi, taishan and hong kong and dont really think that the chinese will be sharpening their chopsticks and coming to kung fu us any time soon-

2 hours into the mainland - all the street and highway signs are in english and chinese. there are bars an shops and all kinds of things with english writing over the doors - even a place called 'the lauderdale steakhouse' with a miami theme and damn good steaks - and this is in a part of china where few westerners even visit - mostly business travelers and no tourists.

all along the highways(which are great btw) you can see the real reasons for all of the stuff in english and the reason we arent likely to have any problems....factory after factory owned by american companies - i mean everywhere

china is like the world's biggest industrial park! i can tell you that in the last 10 years or so china has put up a ton of big western style hotels, beefed up their transportation infrasructure and done everything they can to make it easier for businessmen, especially americans to get around easily.

at the passport checkpoints i was always pulled out of the main line(sometimes with over 500 people in it!) and taken to the front by the guards who speed up my passage and didnt even check my bags while they were scrutinizing all the locals. even at hotels when i went to diner they would clear a huge table and dedicate 3 or 4 people just to any westerners that came in - the bathrooms even say "MEN" and "WOMEN"...which struck me as odd - i mean, it would be like going to pampas texas and seeing chinese writing on the doors! you expect it in the big cities like hong kong but way into the mainland????

- there could be somethin brewin but my guess is that they want to team up economically to get a piece of the pie -

[This message has been edited by mrfish (edited 01-19-2001).]

Offline StSanta

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2496
China and Russia - "friendship pact"
« Reply #4 on: January 19, 2001, 02:26:00 PM »
Yeah, now that you got God fearing republicans in control, le's paint up a scary picture and find ourselves an enemy.

Who knows, if we're lucky we might even become as paranoid as back in the 50-s - true commie haters every one of us

 .

If Clinton was so weak and dumb and naieve, why dinnae the Chinese just run straight over Taiwan, eh?

Some of you reps won't give the slightest credit to Clinton. That's sad, because it shows that you're incapable of objective thinkingwhen it comes to politics.


------------------
StSanta
9./JG 54 "Grünherz"

"I am the light at the end of your sorry little tunnel." - A. Eldricht

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18206
China and Russia - "friendship pact"
« Reply #5 on: January 19, 2001, 02:41:00 PM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by StSanta:

If Clinton was so weak and dumb and naieve, why dinnae the Chinese just run straight over Taiwan, eh?

Answer: They were waiting for four more years of clinton aka gore of "downsizing government" via downsizing the military along with chasing out the last of it's remaining experienced commanders.

mrfish, I hope you are correct. I do not believe the Chinese people nor Russian folk would wish US harm. Just their leaders...

But what do we have to fear, we'd just send StSanta over as Ambassador and they'd see the error of their ways  

Eagler

"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline mrfish

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2343
China and Russia - "friendship pact"
« Reply #6 on: January 19, 2001, 03:18:00 PM »
haha eagler- yeah i hear that sleigh of his is stealth enabled  

the leaders are a threat  but there is a real 'vibe' in hong kong since the take-over and on the mainland too these days. the commies know that they cant stop the momentum and they are getting a taste of success anyway and they like it - it is amazing, but on commie run govt television they even showed protests etc - not the falung gong stuff but any televised dissent at all is major change for the chinese -

my wife is chinese and when her family left 12 years ago it was a much different country - there was a time when she wouldnt have been allowed back but now they dont even care - in fact the govt isnt half as tight about things as they used to be - i was truly surprised

the people are getting sick of the leaders who are old and stoggy and slow to change - i swear though the funniest thing i have ever seen was out in a village off the pearl river where they had chickens in the street, all kinds of made up - rigged up mad max lookin cars and, i kid you not, this peasant guy pulls out a cell phone! every single person in this country has a cell phone i dont know why, and there are still places with no sewer -
 

Offline Gunthr

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3043
      • http://www.dot.squat
China and Russia - "friendship pact"
« Reply #7 on: January 19, 2001, 03:23:00 PM »
QUOTE:

"Yeah, now that you got God fearing republicans in control, le's paint up a scary picture and find ourselves an enemy.
Who knows, if we're lucky we might even become as paranoid as back in the 50-s - true commie haters every one of us

.

If Clinton was so weak and dumb and naieve, why dinnae the Chinese just run straight over Taiwan, eh?

Some of you reps won't give the slightest credit to Clinton. That's sad, because it shows that you're incapable of objective thinkingwhen it comes to politics.


------------------
StSanta
9./JG 54 "Grünherz"

            -------------

 Clinton made some good, moderate decisions that I agreed with. He also had some centrist leanings that made the Democratic hardliners cringe at times, in my opinion.

Clinton isn't dumb, or naive, either.

I just don't believe in BIG government, tons of laws and regulations, and promises to take care of me, and to provide for me from womb to tomb with money taken from others.

And I condemn Clinton for his towering arrogance, his lies, his treason, and the real damage he has done to the office of the President of the United States of America. I really didn't want my kids to become cynical about the President of the USA, but they are now. They don't look up to the man, and I don't either.

I would have a problem with it if he lived in my neighborhood in fact, because I care about having a wholesome place to raise my 4 daughters who are still in elementary and highschool.

Good riddance to Clinton. Unfortunately, I'm afraid he's gonna still be around to irritate the heck out of me.    

Gunthr
 

[This message has been edited by Gunthr (edited 01-19-2001).]
"When I speak I put on a mask. When I act, I am forced to take it off."  - Helvetius 18th Century

Offline Gunthr

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3043
      • http://www.dot.squat
China and Russia - "friendship pact"
« Reply #8 on: January 19, 2001, 03:29:00 PM »
Just saw your post Mrfish. Man, do I envy you! I would love to go see China.  

I still think we are looking at some trouble up ahead though from what I've been reading. What the heck are you doing eating steaks in China anyway, c'mon!  

Gunthr
"When I speak I put on a mask. When I act, I am forced to take it off."  - Helvetius 18th Century

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18206
China and Russia - "friendship pact"
« Reply #9 on: January 19, 2001, 03:57:00 PM »
mrfish
Yes, I agree. If we make it through a generation or two, things will be different. As the old leaders and their old world ways die off, democracy will be given a chance. Today though China's leadership is basically backwards, ie state run abortion as a means of birth control, and Russia doesn't even have any heat. Giving more money to the Russian mob won't fix it either. Easy to build up an army if it's one of the only place to get three square meals, clothing and a warm residence. I think if we survive the current leaders and democracy and capitalism are given fertile grounds to grow, it'll work. If the leaders get greedy in their old age, it'll be a different story..

Then again maybe I am getting paranoid as I read too much Tom Clancy  

Eagler
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline AKDejaVu

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5049
      • http://www.dbstaines.com
China and Russia - "friendship pact"
« Reply #10 on: January 19, 2001, 04:01:00 PM »
China and Russia have such a rich history of teamwork and comradery.  I'm amazed this hasn't happened earlier.  They were bound to forget that they have been fighting for nearly 5000 years and recognize the US as the new threat sooner or later.

AKDejaVu

Offline AKDejaVu

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5049
      • http://www.dbstaines.com
China and Russia - "friendship pact"
« Reply #11 on: January 19, 2001, 04:02:00 PM »
LOL! Just had a vision of GW Bush at the Great Wall of China saying "Tear down that wall!".

Hehehehehe

AKDejaVu

Offline Tac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4085
China and Russia - "friendship pact"
« Reply #12 on: January 19, 2001, 04:52:00 PM »
I see the leader of china in New York saying "Tear down that squeak in the toga!"

 *grin*

Russia always had the biggest nuke arsenal throught the entire cold war. Funny thing is, that only 300 nukes need be detonated on the same day to wipe out ALL LIFE on earth and make a nuclear winter that would make the ice age look like a cool spring morning. The US had like 1500 missiles while the USSR had like 5000 of them. With that much we wont have to worry about nuclear winter, but vacuum exposure once the continents achieve orbit.

I just wish the U.N. was a reality instead of a joke. Sad times folks!

TheWobble

  • Guest
China and Russia - "friendship pact"
« Reply #13 on: January 19, 2001, 05:11:00 PM »
Tac,
reserch had been done which deemed that about 1 in 6 soviet missles would actually make it off the ground because they were made in haste and with improper materials, andother 50% would be expected to fail in flight for similar reasons, If the soviets had ever tried to launch all 5000 they would probably wipe out their own country before anyone else got a shot off.  the only reason so many were made is because they wanted to appear to have more destructive power, many of their ICBMs didnt even have warheads on the, just a rocket....not much more than a long range scud.  Not that it matters any more anyway.

Offline mrfish

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2343
China and Russia - "friendship pact"
« Reply #14 on: January 19, 2001, 05:22:00 PM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by Tac:

I just wish the U.N. was a reality instead of a joke. Sad times folks!

Yep