Author Topic: So is the G-14 top speed going to be fixed?  (Read 4502 times)

Offline Hawco

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 650
So is the G-14 top speed going to be fixed?
« Reply #30 on: April 04, 2006, 02:50:46 PM »
I more curious than anything else RE : 109s, I've watched loads of programs about dogfights between allied and Axis planes and time after time the allied pilots would mention that they were trying to turn with the 109 and then keep up with it in a dive?
I've yet to see a 109 in the AH set outdive anyting, or even have a good turn fight with any Allied aircraft (yet)

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
So is the G-14 top speed going to be fixed?
« Reply #31 on: April 04, 2006, 03:02:47 PM »
Well in the Battle of Britain the Spit1s had a bubble float carbuerator (spelling?), that would cut the flow of gas to the engine in low G moves (like a dive). 109Es in the BOB could dive away and their opponents would have their engines cut out, meaning they could not dive very fast. That may be what you heard/read about.

Offline Hawco

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 650
So is the G-14 top speed going to be fixed?
« Reply #32 on: April 04, 2006, 03:09:25 PM »
It was mostly from accounts of pony pilots, it was usally a hard turning fight then a steep dive followed by a zoom (rope), I'n going to take a k4 up and try this out myself I think.

Offline Hawco

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 650
So is the G-14 top speed going to be fixed?
« Reply #33 on: April 04, 2006, 04:28:24 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Bruno
The G-2 and G-6 have the same engine, DB605A. The G-14 has a DB605 AM, which means water-methanol injection. The K-4 has a DB605DM. The K-4 has a higher FTH then the others due to the mounting of the DB603 super charger to the DB605.

The G-14 only produces about 300ps more then the G-2 and G-6. Its only on WEP where the G-14 out performs the G-2. At mil power the G-2 will out perform both the G-6 and G-14. At WEP the G-2 will out perform the G-6 as well. At mil power the G-14 and G-6 and almost indentical in performance.

The G-6 will get used mostly in events and Combat Tour. It was the most numerous produced Gustavs (12k+). There 5000 or so G-14s produced.

There's no rule as to which 109 to take. Fly the one you like. The K-4 will out perform all the other 109s in AH, at all altitudes.

The only thing you need to know is that on WEP the FTH of the G-14 is 16,400ft. Above that its not much faster then the G-6. OTD the G-14 will hit around 357mph w/WEP. WEP is 10 min on 5 off.

The G-6 entered service in Feb '43
The G-14 June '44
The K-4 Oct '44




Very interesting, thanks for suppling that information, I would say that the 109 seemed to be always in constant development, what with all the variants and sub variants that seemed to be produced.
What would you say was the top end 109? was it the K4 ? or was there some other that hasn't reached the AH skies yet?
On the subject of the K4, what alt should that be at for max speed? I've heard everywhere from 20k -36k and was just curious.
thanks
Hawco

Offline Bruno

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1252
      • http://4jg53.org
So is the G-14 top speed going to be fixed?
« Reply #34 on: April 04, 2006, 05:48:14 PM »
The AH2 K-4 speed chart can be found here:



452mph or so at 22k on WEP

430 mph or so at 26k on MIL

All the AH2 aircraft charts can be found here:

Airplanes

Offline Bruno

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1252
      • http://4jg53.org
So is the G-14 top speed going to be fixed?
« Reply #35 on: April 04, 2006, 06:03:20 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hawco
I more curious than anything else RE : 109s, I've watched loads of programs about dogfights between allied and Axis planes and time after time the allied pilots would mention that they were trying to turn with the 109 and then keep up with it in a dive?
I've yet to see a 109 in the AH set outdive anyting, or even have a good turn fight with any Allied aircraft (yet)


Take 'pilot accounts' with a grain of salt. You only ever get one side in those accounts. You never know what the other pilot was doing (was he turning as hard as he could, full power in the dive, at what speed did the dive begin etc...) I can post LW accounts where by they claimed they could out turn Spitfires, or out dive this and that. The truth is always some where in the middle and the best way to make any judgement is based on real data (when possible) not on what Mr. SuperAce recalls or thinks happened.

Don't fall into the trap that some of those who were educated on the History Channel or some poorly researched book. The best way is to figure out how the planes fly and perform in AH (or any game) and work their strengths as modeled rather then banging your head on the wall with 'Mr. Experten said the XXX plane could do XXX and I can't do it in AH so AH is wrong...'

In game you can never create the exact conditions that lead to Mr. SuperAce's out turning that Spitfire in his Ju 52 or the P-51 one pilot that claims he could out run a 262 in level flight. With out knowing the exact context these stories maybe interesting but never capture what actually happened. Some will jump in here with 'how dare you call Mr. SuperAce a liar, he was there...' but so what...

Offline gatt

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2441
So is the G-14 top speed going to be fixed?
« Reply #36 on: April 05, 2006, 02:23:12 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hawco
I take it then the G14 should be used for Operations that are from 17k downwards and the K4 from 17k upwards ?
So where does the G6 fit in to all this?


Welcome in the land of: "No rolling plane set. We want to fly everything from 1940 to 1945, no matter how gameish it is" :rolleyes:
"And one of the finest aircraft I ever flew was the Macchi C.205. Oh, beautiful. And here you had the perfect combination of italian styling and german engineering .... it really was a delight to fly ... and we did tests on it and were most impressed." - Captain Eric Brown

Offline Oldman731

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9479
So is the G-14 top speed going to be fixed?
« Reply #37 on: April 05, 2006, 07:17:03 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Bruno
The truth is always some where in the middle and the best way to make any judgement is based on real data (when possible) not on what Mr. SuperAce recalls or thinks happened.

On the other hand, the "real data" is also not necessarily accurate.  Most of it was acquired by test pilots putting an aircraft through its paces; it is therefore only as accurate as the pilot was that day.  You only have to peruse these boards to see wild variations in the "real data" for any given plane (although the 109, FW, Hellcat and Corsair seem to be the most prominent examples).

I think it is very unwise to ignore or dismiss anecdotal evidence, simply because it conflicts with test pilot data.

- oldman

Offline Ghosth

  • AH Training Corps (retired)
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8497
      • http://332nd.org
So is the G-14 top speed going to be fixed?
« Reply #38 on: April 05, 2006, 08:09:02 AM »
Anecdotal evidence never proved anything.

With the right setup you can make a point with anecdotal evidence to say that pigs fly. Yet the DATA will show that pigs can not POSSIBLY fly. The pig had to be either boosted from the ground, or dropped from something that does fly.

The problem is that anecdotal evidence never gives the whole story.
Its single sided, only see's its small part of the world. And the results of that are tied to memory, which we all know can be selective, faulty and full of mistakes.

So while it may have interest to us as pilots. To HTC its virtually worthless.
What they need is DATA, provable, repeatable Data. Facts & figures that do not reply on anyone's "memory" of events. Or subjective "feel" of a plane.

Offline Knegel

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 620
So is the G-14 top speed going to be fixed?
« Reply #39 on: April 05, 2006, 08:37:45 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Oldman731
On the other hand, the "real data" is also not necessarily accurate.  Most of it was acquired by test pilots putting an aircraft through its paces; it is therefore only as accurate as the pilot was that day.  You only have to peruse these boards to see wild variations in the "real data" for any given plane (although the 109, FW, Hellcat and Corsair seem to be the most prominent examples).

I think it is very unwise to ignore or dismiss anecdotal evidence, simply because it conflicts with test pilot data.

- oldman


Hi,

all aspects can be wrong or missleading. Test datas, pilot experiences, same like very nice looking calculations are not that much worth, if we dont know the background datas and of course it can all be very helpfull, if we know the exact circumstances where the tests, calculations and experiences was made in.

Even if we would have some real WWII fighters to test them, there always would be differents between planes of the same plane type, we even would get different results caused by the temperature and pilot.  

In real life there is no 109G6 with exact this or that Vmax or climbspeed, like we have it in our games(actually even in game the pilot make a big different while testing the Vmax and specialy climb/turn ratio).

The best we can try to do is to minimize the 'greyzone of realism'.

We can say a Me109G14 had a Vmax of 400-420mph, maybe, after many more researches, we can minimize the greyzone to 405-415mph or what ever.

Regarding other values, like turn radius, climb rate, acceleration etc, the greyzone of realism will stay pretty wide.

Actually i count this as luck for the FM/DM makers, cause they can use this greyzone to adjust the performence relation to provide a good gameplay, without to get unrealistic.

As long as the performences stay inside the 'greyzone of realism' and provide a good even gameplay, we should be happy.

Imho AH is not bad regarding this, though not perfect!

btw. i dont think that the basic performences are that important at all.
A FM/Dm maker can create a plane that is faster than all others, climb better, accelerate better, but bleed energy like mad while a highspeed turn, so the other planes only need to turn a bit to gain all advantages.
Or a plane simply get a unrealistic high or low drag above Vmax.
Or one plane get a very ugly stallbehaviour, as result although its possible to turn more tight with this plane, only aces can do this under presure of a combat. Or make a very good performing plane to a unstable gunplattform, then the performence isnt that much worth(and the other way around).

Greetings, Knegel

Offline AutoPilot

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 732
So is the G-14 top speed going to be fixed?
« Reply #40 on: April 05, 2006, 09:09:19 AM »
Quote
I've yet to see a 109 in the AH set outdive anyting, or even have a good turn fight with any Allied aircraft (yet)


Really?I turned with you yesterday , you was in a P-51-B, i was in a 110-C.

You are a timid fighter pilot,one day you will know the true power of the Mustang at 20-K, and you should have got me.The funny thing is me and the squaddie(both in 110C's)did everything toget you to play and it wasn't until we flew away from you that you came too engage us.Point is,if you are too timid to fight 2 - 110's then what will you do against the 109?



Krusty,i have a request for a skin.One that no one else has made that i have seen yet.I respectfully request that you or someone make the
"Black Tulip" skin.I prefer Krusty as he has done some of the best skinning work yet.

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
So is the G-14 top speed going to be fixed?
« Reply #41 on: April 05, 2006, 09:31:59 AM »
Sorry, Raven beat me to it. He did Hartmann's (Was it Hartmann??) G-14 with winter camo and black tulip. It's in the skins forum, with screenshots! It's just finished, so it should be on the top 10 posts.

Offline AutoPilot

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 732
So is the G-14 top speed going to be fixed?
« Reply #42 on: April 05, 2006, 11:56:18 AM »
Why not do a Black Tulip skin for all the 109's?

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
So is the G-14 top speed going to be fixed?
« Reply #43 on: April 05, 2006, 05:24:43 PM »
Because not all of them had it. Because the skins would be nearly identical, and would be boring to do. Because Hartmann's skins are already pretty uninteresting as-is, with or without the tulip. Without it, he just has another basic camo 109. With it he has a basic camo 109 with black triangles around the nose. I can see having 1, but 1 for every 109? Why bother?

Offline AutoPilot

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 732
So is the G-14 top speed going to be fixed?
« Reply #44 on: April 05, 2006, 05:51:22 PM »
Quote
can see having 1, but 1 for every 109? Why bother?


He didn't just fly one model of the 109 the entire war.I think Mr.Hartmann has more than earned a little more than you calling his colors boring.He still is the holder of the most kills.

Forget anyway i hate too have you be so bored.i should have asked a fan of the 109 instead,i just thought since you were one of the best skinners you would.I was wrong.