Originally posted by AKWarp
[B [/B]
Odd, we just won the damn war by taking an FT base.... Ok I'll give you that. At the end it makes sense to end the war take FT base when you cant figure out how, or are too inept to do it any other way.
So for your benefit I will rephrase my entire statement on the matter.
but the bulk of what I said still stands as true
Until that point is reached where the end of the "war" is so near that the capture of one or two bases will bring it to an inevitable conclusion
Until that point,Strategically speaking, they are insignificant. Taking them makes little to no Spence [sic] whatsoever in "winning the war" or to keep from loosing [sic] the war for that matter
In the end if it were honestly stated. Taking the bases in the FT area while there are a significant amount of other bases left isnt about the cause of winning the war. it isnt for the cause of having bases that are easily defended, it isnt about the greater good of the country or game. That entire line of argument is BS
Until it reaches the point where there are only a few bases left too be taken and the "war" is a forgone conclusion and/ or you cant figure out a way to do it any other way.
Its about intentionally trying to be a jerk and to piss people off. That's really the long and short of it.
Any other claim is an outright lie
There, Happy now?
"No more so than the BS claim of "can't find fights without FT" "Have to fly 15 or 20 mins to get a fight" blah blah blah"
No different than the BS the furballers cry about (see above) See now you might find this hard to believe but I've always agreed that, That statement is also BS. Even on Pizza I've felt that claim is BS.
But What your not getting is the furballers do not want to take part of, or be a part of the landgrab in any way, shape, or form.
That is the entire reason why this particular map was designed the way is was with a FT so that the people who dont want to be a part of the landgrab can do so without effecting the landgrab and the landgrabbers can take all the bases they want and "win the war" without having to interfere with the furballers.
It was made that way so everyone could play the game the way they wanted to play it. All that's needed for it to work is for the players to have a little respect for other people.
You dont NEED to take a FT base to win the war.
The only reason to take a FT base is to be a jerk, piss people off, show a total lack of respect for other players who do not want to be forced into playing the way you want to play. Or because you cant figure out a way to do it any other way.
And I'll say it again. To claim it is for any other reason it an outright lie
Lessee...we took the FT base and won the war a few minutes ago....apparently taking one the other night didn't lose it for us either. Since when were we put under a timer as to how fast it had to be done? See above.
Your not under a timer. But time is a very good indicater as to how well a horde is performing.
Time is important because you only have so long before people start logging off
Last night was the exeption to the norm as typically if a map isnt reset by 1:00 AM ETS it doesn't get reset until well into daylight hours at the earliest. If it gets reset.
I wasn't there but my guess is FT was captured because it was the easiest way to finish the map off before time ran out.
In closing. If you go through my posts over the years You will see a few things
I've always maintained ENY wasn't going to work.
And with all due respect to HTC.
It doesnt.
At least not the way it needs to.
And I didnt think any side should have limitations as for plane choice in non perked rides.
I typically want and try to argue for whats fair for everyone, and not just one side or the other.
More times then not I am on the side of the landgrabbers when it comes to the subject of base captures.
This map is the exeption to that
ANY other map and I would agree they are all fair game.
but this map was designed (not by me) to be as fair as possible to everyone.
Any other map I would be on the side of the landgrabbers in this arguement.
Now as I've mentioned in another post. I dont spend a lot of time in Ft.
In fact you could probably count on 1 hand the amount of times I've even launched a plane from FT and have some fingers left over
So really FT doesnt effect me personally one way or the other.
But on this map. The landgrabbers that insist on taking FT fields for ANY reason are wrong. Dead wrong.
Personally I think HTC should map the FT bases uncaptureable and unporkable
Actually if it were up to me each side would have to uncaptureable and unporkable bases. One at a FT location. and the other would be the air base closest base to HQ. And neither should count towards the basecount in fields needed to win/loose the war. So in effect all you would have to do is get a country down to 5 bases left, the two unporkable/capturable ones and three regular (Captureable) bases.
I cant understand why HTC doesn't do that ( at least in FT) as I doubt many, if any would object to it and it would solve a whole bunch of arguments in one fell swoop with the least amount of whines one way or the other about it