Originally posted by Squire
Perhaps folks are taking "Fighter Town", and "Tank Town" a bit too seriously. I dont recall seeing anywhere that they were ever given that name "officially", or that it was ever intended to be a mini-ma, or mini-da. If they were, HTC would have already disabled base capture there ect. and you would have a TT and FT on every map, which you don't.
Its just another map, the designer put certain bases in there for a fun setup, but it was never intended as many seem to want it to be.
My 2 cents, I dont really care about it (bomb it dont bomb it, whatever), just an observation.
While FT wasnt "officially" designated that by HTC
FT on the Doughnut map was put there EXACTLY and specificlly by the designer of that map for the purpose of having a mini Da. or to be more specific a place within the MA for the furballers to have their fun without being forced to be a part of the landgrab
I dont spend much time if any at FT on that map And any other map I would side with the landgrabbers.
On Doughnut map I am firmly on the side of the furballers.
Even though I dont spend any time there
We have how many maps?
there is one map alone the furballers can look forward to that has an area specifically designed for them.
I say everyone else has all the other maps to landgrab away on any base bar none.
Let the furballers have this one area on this one map to themselves.
I implore HTC to at some point make these 3 bases uncapturable.
s this would be the easiest, fastest, and most satisfactory way to bring about a resolution to this rift for everyone without removing the map which would only make everyone unhappy.
This is the one time when IMO HTC really can please everyone