Okay.. granted... you have an issue with the people that choose a gay lifestyle. What about the abnormal ones that somehow didn't get all their wires connected correctly during the switch from female to male in the womb?
Personally, I try to tolerate gays. I have to believe that some of them did not make the choice to be so. As a male, I can only assume that given the choice between a woman and some guy's hairy bellybutton and you choose the hairy ass, there's something abnormal about you. Not necessarily unnatural, but certainly abnormal.
I think it would be rather difficult for someone that chooses this lifestyle to get past all the medical/psychological wickets necessary to have this procedure. Hell, talk to a woman. In some states, it's virtually impossible for a childless woman to be voluntarily sterilized. I have to believe that a sex change is even more difficult.
The article even states, "It will not cover cosmetic procedures and can only be used after a doctor deems treatment medically necessary."
This policy isn't about catering to homos. It's about addressing the medical concerns of people born with characteristics of both sexes.
------------------
cheers,
sand
screamin blue messiahsThe SBM's are hiring!