Author Topic: How would the P-38 have performed...  (Read 3866 times)

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
How would the P-38 have performed...
« Reply #45 on: May 07, 2006, 02:54:21 PM »
Hmmm... Which Japanese planes would that work best against...?
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
How would the P-38 have performed...
« Reply #46 on: May 07, 2006, 03:08:20 PM »
Twin engine bombers only :D
Or the Emily (big flying boat)
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
How would the P-38 have performed...
« Reply #47 on: May 07, 2006, 03:58:31 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by HoHun


(By the way, it's worth remembering that McGuire apparently was killed breaking the one rule Kirby explicitely pointed out: Not to turn with the Japanese.)

Regards,

Henning (HoHun)




Actually, that's not how he died.  Yes, he was in an turning engagement when he died but it wasn't the cause.  



ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline HoHun

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2182
How would the P-38 have performed...
« Reply #48 on: May 07, 2006, 04:20:57 PM »
Hi Ack-Ack,

>Actually, that's not how he died.  

Hm, what exactly do you mean by "that"?

Regards,

Henning (HoHun)

Offline Captain Virgil Hilts

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6128
How would the P-38 have performed...
« Reply #49 on: May 07, 2006, 04:39:34 PM »
Exactly what he said. From what Weaver, his wingman said, McGuire's plane had an engine problem, and one did not respond when he throttled up after using differential throttling. The plane McGuire was flying was regularly flown by another pilot who did not fly as aggressively as McGuire did, and as such the plane was untested for McGuire's style of flying.
"I haven't seen Berlin yet, from the ground or the air, and I plan on doing both, BEFORE the war is over."

SaVaGe


Offline HoHun

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2182
How would the P-38 have performed...
« Reply #50 on: May 07, 2006, 05:15:47 PM »
Hi Hilts,

>Exactly what he said.

Hm, I don't think I would have asked if I thought his post was perfectly unambiguous.

>From what Weaver, his wingman said, McGuire's plane had an engine problem, and one did not respond when he throttled up after using differential throttling. The plane McGuire was flying was regularly flown by another pilot who did not fly as aggressively as McGuire did, and as such the plane was untested for McGuire's style of flying.

So what was it that killed him in your opinion? My summary of the above would be "McGuire's style of flying", but I feel that might not be what you were aiming at.

Regards,

Henning (HoHun)

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
How would the P-38 have performed...
« Reply #51 on: May 10, 2006, 07:16:21 PM »
McGuire was an aggressive pilot, there are a lot of stories of him returning from missions with bent wings because of how he threw the plane around in combat.

What is the most likely cause of his death was a spin caused when throttling up one engine.  In the P-38, when you cut back on one engine and then throttle it back up, you need to throttle down the 2nd engine as well and then advance both throttle together.  Otherwise the P-38 can get into a very nasty spin and at the low altitude McGure was flying at, is usually 99.9999% fatal.  It can also happen if the engine doesn't respond immediately like Savage explained and that might have been the case with McGuire. He was not flying his regular plane that was tuned to his aggressive flying style, so it's possible that it wasn't in as good shape as his was.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
How would the P-38 have performed...
« Reply #52 on: May 10, 2006, 07:42:13 PM »
Quote
McGuire was an aggressive pilot, there are a lot of stories of him returning from missions with bent wings because of how he threw the plane around in combat.

What is the most likely cause of his death was a spin caused when throttling up one engine. In the P-38, when you cut back on one engine and then throttle it back up, you need to throttle down the 2nd engine as well and then advance both throttle together. Otherwise the P-38 can get into a very nasty spin and at the low altitude McGure was flying at, is usually 99.9999% fatal. It can also happen if the engine doesn't respond immediately like Savage explained and that might have been the case with McGuire. He was not flying his regular plane that was tuned to his aggressive flying style, so it's possible that it wasn't in as good shape as his was.



 .... which, probably would have never happened if he did not try to turn with a Japanese plane in the first place?

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
How would the P-38 have performed...
« Reply #53 on: May 10, 2006, 10:48:40 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Kweassa
.... which, probably would have never happened if he did not try to turn with a Japanese plane in the first place?



But your implication is still wrong.  It wasn't the turning with the Japanese plane that killed him, he died from a spin caused by asymetrical (sp?) power while he was in a turning engagement.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
How would the P-38 have performed...
« Reply #54 on: May 10, 2006, 11:49:41 PM »
Quote
But your implication is still wrong. It wasn't the turning with the Japanese plane that killed him, he died from a spin caused by asymetrical (sp?) power while he was in a turning engagement.
[/quote

 Fact or fiction? Is that the officially 'proven' reason behind McGuire's death, or is it just one of the many speculations behind it? I'm asking because I seem to remember a variety of reasons listed from McGuire's own recklessness to external drop tanks.

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
How would the P-38 have performed...
« Reply #55 on: May 11, 2006, 12:07:48 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Captain Virgil Hilts
Exactly what he said. From what Weaver, his wingman said, McGuire's plane had an engine problem, and one did not respond when he throttled up after using differential throttling. The plane McGuire was flying was regularly flown by another pilot who did not fly as aggressively as McGuire did, and as such the plane was untested for McGuire's style of flying.



Savage, Im curious as to your comment about the pilot of the P38 that McGuire was flying that day.  He was flying 9 kill Ace Fred Champlin's #112 Eileen-Anne.  Champlain may have not bent P38s like McGuire did, (few if any others did) but I'd be hard pressed to describe him as not aggressive with 9 kills to his credit.  He'd been flying combat with the 475th as long as McGuire had going back to the first days.

Did that comment come from a particular source regarding Champlin's bird and Champlin for that matter?

How would one tune a 38 to McGuire's style?  And why wouldn't any front line 38 be tuned to get the best out of it?  Kinda doubt that the crew chief of Champlin's bird took less care of it then McGuires crew cheif took of Pudgy.
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Valkyrie

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 172
How would the P-38 have performed...
« Reply #56 on: May 11, 2006, 02:26:14 AM »
Maguire went down after taking rounds in a break. He got greedy looking for 3 ro 4 kills, cant remember which, and went into a spin after breaking to tight with his DT's still attached. It was a 3 ship flight, with 1 member already being hit by a ki 43 that came in from the haze in front and got a shot. There was a ki 84 on a trianing flight in the area that also made and a pass and possibly hit Maguire in his break. The Ki 43 was destroyed in the engagement and the ki 84 got away.


Maguire made 3 mistakes

1. Hung around the fight after one of his wingmen had taken hits
2. Didn't drop his Dt's at the start of the fight so he could stay around longer to make his kills
3. His airspeed at the time of his break was below 150kias most definatily. This was a violation of his first rule, and he paid for it.


Also on previous flights Maguire had broken so hard he broke the spars on several occasions and was lucky to have made it back.



Vlkyrie

Offline Captain Virgil Hilts

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6128
How would the P-38 have performed...
« Reply #57 on: May 11, 2006, 09:18:28 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Guppy35
Savage, Im curious as to your comment about the pilot of the P38 that McGuire was flying that day.  He was flying 9 kill Ace Fred Champlin's #112 Eileen-Anne.  Champlain may have not bent P38s like McGuire did, (few if any others did) but I'd be hard pressed to describe him as not aggressive with 9 kills to his credit.  He'd been flying combat with the 475th as long as McGuire had going back to the first days.

Did that comment come from a particular source regarding Champlin's bird and Champlin for that matter?

How would one tune a 38 to McGuire's style?  And why wouldn't any front line 38 be tuned to get the best out of it?  Kinda doubt that the crew chief of Champlin's bird took less care of it then McGuires crew cheif took of Pudgy.


When I was involved in the project looking for the wreckage and the cause, we found through a couple of sources that Fed was not known for using differential throttling like McGuire was. It had nothing to do with his nature, but rather his flying style. The comment had nothing to do with Fred's willingness to mix it up, but rather how he flew when he did. The point is that the engines may not have been tuned for the way McGuire used the throttles, so that they may not have responded to the throttles the way Pudgy did. It doesn't have anything to do with how much peak power the engines made, or how well they ran, but rather how they responded to having the throttles opened and closed. So please, do not misunderstand the statement about the tuning of Champlin's plane as any sort of indictment of Champlin's flying abilities, aggressiveness, or anything else. Nor is it any sort of indictment of the plane itself, Champlin's crew chief, or McGuire's crew chief who was up late getting Champlin's bird ready for McGuire to fly it the next day. No doubt all involved were absolutely the best of the best, and America's finest.




By the way, with regards to what Thropp said about the fight where McGuire and Rittmayer died, I have a couple of problems with Thropp's account. First, he was far enough away from Weaver and McGuire that he did not see the crash itself, nor did he know who crashed. Second, his claim that McGuire took hits does not agree with the fact that Weaver said that he was under attack and McGuire was trying to clear him. Third, Thropp was evidently angry with Weaver, and felt Weaver abandoned him. Fourth, he also claims Rittmayer was faking engine trouble. Fifth, there are no reports of him making any effort at the time to correct what he claimed were errors and false statements in Weaver's report.


Fukuda, who shot Rittmayer down, was flying the second plane. He actually hit Rittmayer on an off angle nose to nose pass, and killed Rittmayer in the cockpit. Fukuda reported seeing Rittmayer wearing a scarlet scarf, Rittmayer wore no such scarf, and was certainly hit in the head or neck by Fukuda and was either dead or dying. Thropp was the other plane hit, taking damage to one engine. Fukuda was the pilot of the second plane which was not known to have been there with certainty until sometime in the seventies. The pilot of the first plane (I think his name was Sugimoto) was shot down, and killed by Phillipino guerillas as he was getting out of the wrecked plane.


Weaver, McGuire's wingman, and the pilot under attack calling for help originally, said the Japanese plane was behind him, trying to get in position for a shot and making good progress, and he saw and heard McGuire trying to gain position to clear him. He said McGuire's plane shuddered, the engines made an odd sound, and the plane snapped inverted and went in from about 1500 feet. That is consistent with one engine failing to respond when differential throttling is used. According to several of the best pilots with a lot of P-38 time, the only way to get a P-38 to snap over that way was to turn into a dead engine, or be in a turn and lose the inside engine. If McGuire did in fact try to use differential throttling to get inside the Japanese plane, and the P-38 was close to a high speed stall, and the inside engine didn't come back up when he throttled up, the P-38 would have instantly snapped inverted and spun, which is exactly what happened. And 1500 feet was not enough room to recover.

There were no bullet holes found in the wreckage seen after the crash, nor in the pieces seen later. Further, McGuire's body was later recovered and an autopsy performed. The findings were injuries consistent with a crash, and there was no mention of any bullet wounds or possible bullet wounds.
"I haven't seen Berlin yet, from the ground or the air, and I plan on doing both, BEFORE the war is over."

SaVaGe


Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
How would the P-38 have performed...
« Reply #58 on: May 11, 2006, 10:17:18 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Valkyrie
Maguire went down after taking rounds in a break.



Vlkyrie




Wrong.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
How would the P-38 have performed...
« Reply #59 on: May 11, 2006, 10:29:49 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Captain Virgil Hilts
When I was involved in the project looking for the wreckage and the cause, we found through a couple of sources that Fed was not known for using differential throttling like McGuire was. It had nothing to do with his nature, but rather his flying style. The comment had nothing to do with Fred's willingness to mix it up, but rather how he flew when he did. The point is that the engines may not have been tuned for the way McGuire used the throttles, so that they may not have responded to the throttles the way Pudgy did. It doesn't have anything to do with how much peak power the engines made, or how well they ran, but rather how they responded to having the throttles opened and closed. So please, do not misunderstand the statement about the tuning of Champlin's plane as any sort of indictment of Champlin's flying abilities, aggressiveness, or anything else. Nor is it any sort of indictment of the plane itself, Champlin's crew chief, or McGuire's crew chief who was up late getting Champlin's bird ready for McGuire to fly it the next day. No doubt all involved were absolutely the best of the best, and America's finest.


Thanks for the clarification Savage.  I clearly misinterpreted what you were saying :)
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters