Originally posted by Treize69
Do either of them have a dorsal gun? Just wondering. Looks like the bottom one may have either a single gun covering the low-6, but it could be a brake too.
Both of them did.
(Depending on Variant)
JUDY had two fixed forward firing 7.7mm's and had another 7.7 in the dorsal and a 13mm in the ventral.
JILL early versions has the same as the JUDY - later versions had a 13mm gun that could be removed and used either in the dorsal or ventral positions.
I didn't put it in my other post but a better Torpedo Bomber might be the
B7A GRACE. It is both better armed, faster and carries more ord.
Two wing-mounted 20 mm Type 99 Model 2 cannon and one flexible rear-firing 13 mm Type 2 machine-gun (late production B7A2).

Originally posted by Krusty
I don't know about the Jill, but the Judy is a mid-war (not late-war) plane. It would be easily caught if it was chased, but still it's better than the Val!!!
Depending on the variant you are talking about. The JUDY first went to sea during the Battle of Midway (June 42) as a Fast Carrier Recon Plane. That version is entirely differnt than the Inline-engined Dive Bomber version that came later on in 43. The Radial engined Dive Bomber Version didn't come out till 44 IIRC.
Grant you your last statement is 110% on target - would be like night and day against the VAL. The Heavier ord load can carry up to a 1000lbs bomb or 3x 500 lbs bombs plus the better defensive armament would make a big difference also.
!