« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 [9]   Go Down

Author Topic: Why wasn't the UN involved in the decision to attack Afghanistan?  (Read 3606 times)

Offline Dowding

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6867
      • http://www.psys07629.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/272/index.html
Why wasn't the UN involved in the decision to attack Afghanistan?
« Reply #120 on: October 24, 2001, 04:43:00 PM »
Perhaps Pongo. But why are Turkey in NATO? Questionable human rights record and a bit of 'odd man out' all round.

But they give us more reach into the Middle East and provide us with another Muslim ally. By having them in the alliance we can apply more pressure to calm the Greek-Turkey conflict.

A similar approach could be taken to Russia in a mutual support arrangement. Perhaps not now, but in a couple of decased time?
Logged
War! Never been so much fun. War! Never been so much fun! Go to your brother, Kill him with your gun, Leave him lying in his uniform, Dying in the sun.

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Why wasn't the UN involved in the decision to attack Afghanistan?
« Reply #121 on: October 24, 2001, 05:06:00 PM »
Not the slightest smidge of nationalist fervour. Nor the capability to express it if they had. I aggree they are an interesting member for nato but looking at who nato was formed to contain you can see the advantage to nato having Turkey on side.
Logged

Offline -tronski-

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2825
Why wasn't the UN involved in the decision to attack Afghanistan?
« Reply #122 on: October 24, 2001, 08:53:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Boroda:

BTW, looks like NATO troops in Kosovo are really neutral when it comes to slaughtering Serbs and blowing up Orthodox churches that are 800 years old. Even Turks were not so neutral.

Ahhhh....crap, I don't believe for a second that Nato sholdiers slaughtered Serbs, or blew up Churches, unless your refering to the air campaign. Even then I don't belive Nato would've deliberately hit such politically dangerous targets.
I worked with a Serb, and according to 'serb' radio/news even here in Australia, Nato was losing hundreds of aircraft, raping Nuns, burning bibles (orthodox of course),..F-15's killing the petdog from 20k etc etc. A biased attitude can often soak up such ridiculous propaganda.

 Tronsky

[ 10-24-2001: Message edited by: -tronski- ]
Logged
God created Arrakis to train the faithful

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Why wasn't the UN involved in the decision to attack Afghanistan?
« Reply #123 on: October 24, 2001, 09:57:00 PM »
I am Croatian so feel free to disregard this comment as biased or unfair if you find it so.

The serbs do really have an historical "inferiority" complex of sorts just like their Russian big brothers. Thats why they lie, exaggerate and boast so much when they are in touble, or really just most of the time.
Logged

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
Why wasn't the UN involved in the decision to attack Afghanistan?
« Reply #124 on: October 25, 2001, 11:06:00 AM »
Well, well, misunderstanding again.

I didn't mean NATO troops slaughtering Serbs. I meant that they are neutral enough to let Kosovo turn into something like Chechnya. Remember how they tried to disarm KLA? Naive... And that strange "cannabis harvest" in Macedonia... I don't think NATO officials are that stupid to think Albanians will give up all weapons. Planned 3500 barrels is much less then they have.
Logged

Offline Rooster

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 101
Why wasn't the UN involved in the decision to attack Afghanistan?
« Reply #125 on: October 25, 2001, 02:28:00 PM »
[cut]http://www.stileproject.com/diplomacy.swf [paste]

[ 10-25-2001: Message edited by: Rooster ]
Logged

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
Why wasn't the UN involved in the decision to attack Afghanistan?
« Reply #126 on: October 25, 2001, 10:48:00 PM »
Quote
And that strange "cannabis harvest" in Macedonia...

????? WTF?

Was it any good?
Logged
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline -tronski-

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2825
Why wasn't the UN involved in the decision to attack Afghanistan?
« Reply #127 on: October 25, 2001, 11:23:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Boroda:
Well, well, misunderstanding again.

I didn't mean NATO troops slaughtering Serbs. I meant that they are neutral enough to let Kosovo turn into something like Chechnya. Remember how they tried to disarm KLA? Naive... And that strange "cannabis harvest" in Macedonia... I don't think NATO officials are that stupid to think Albanians will give up all weapons. Planned 3500 barrels is much less then they have.

riiiighht

 

Tronsky
Logged
God created Arrakis to train the faithful
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 [9]   Go Up
« previous next »