Author Topic: what about after the war (Read 1595 times)

Kurt · « **Reply #45 on:** May 13, 2006, 12:07:58 AM »

There has ever only been ONE good air war... there will never be another.

Korea... two types duking it out... SUCKS AW tried it... Never more than 10 people in the arena.

Vietnam... 3 types and a SAM. 'worst air war EVAR'

WWI? haha, sure. Sounds neat when people talk about it... but flying at 75mph in 90HP planes throwing rocks really sucks... Anyone who has ever played one will tell you. AW tried this too... Never more than 10 people in the arena.

Iraq? haha ouch... my pancreas! One airforce... big fun.

Face it kids... There was ONE good air war. And while all future combat will be won by application of air power, the odds of another great air war are about 1 in 50 billion.

cav58d · « **Reply #46 on:** May 13, 2006, 02:16:39 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by mars01
LOLH

But I thought you were a Win the War Hero like the rest????

confused
|
V

Im all about winning the war....Im just saying that playing AH as of recent has become like Ground Hog Day

cav58d · « **Reply #47 on:** May 13, 2006, 02:17:51 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by helldiver
lisen vietnam was a real war the thing is that those STUPID FAT HEADS in congress sat on there buts trying to controll it their way instead of doing it the right way and leting the military fight it the right way. :furious

Helldiver--- U r absolutely hilarious! haha...excessive Smilies:aok

Brenjen · « **Reply #48 on:** May 13, 2006, 09:25:56 AM »

Quote

WWI? haha, sure. Sounds neat when people talk about it... but flying at 75mph in 90HP planes throwing rocks really sucks... Anyone who has ever played one will tell you.

I have played WWI sims over the years & I liked them. It may not draw the crowd that the more glamorous "cadillac of the sky" mustang draws, but all the basic principles are the same.

If everyone is in 75mph planes & firing like weapons; you know, as long as the planes all have interupter gears (the major advancement of WWI air combat), it all boils down to pilot skill & you don't really notice the slower speeds & slower roll & climb rates etc. at least I never paid attention to it. I also never played a WWI sim in the style of AH...so my view is skewed towards the AI games.

Ack-Ack · « **Reply #49 on:** May 13, 2006, 12:31:17 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by cav58d
tinman...I disagree...Seeing as HTC is an American corporation with a majority of American players I think support for a korea/vietnam arena would be extremely high...But I see where you are coming from. I would have absolutely no interest in a "falkland islands" campaign =)

I don't know why people keep asking for something like this when HiTech has stated many times previously that he is not going to make a WWI, Korea or Vietnam flight sim.

ack-ack

Squire · « **Reply #50 on:** May 13, 2006, 06:52:42 PM »

WW1 done well would be fine, its just getting a D- in history seems the norm these days and nobody is interested in it because they don't know jack s*** about it.

Principals are the same, and there were a lot of very interesting combat a/c 1916-1918.

No, its not everybodys cup of tea, but then some like jet sims and don't like AH too. They are out there.

...anyways, been debated before many times. I will leave it there.

AquaShrimp · « **Reply #51 on:** May 15, 2006, 05:37:33 AM »

Korea and Vietnam werent so different from World War II, as far as air to air combat went. There were still massive dogfights in each. In fact, towards the end of the Vietnam War, the dogfights between F4s and Mig17s/21s became more and more intense.