Author Topic: this is not a B29 post...but (Read 3577 times)

ridley1 · « **on:** May 11, 2006, 03:14:47 PM »

Am I wrong to think that we should have more options to spend our bomber perks on than just Ar234s?

SuperDud · « **Reply #1 on:** May 11, 2006, 03:33:00 PM »

Like a.... B29???

Furball · « **Reply #2 on:** May 11, 2006, 03:35:26 PM »

with?

Lusche · « **Reply #3 on:** May 11, 2006, 03:38:33 PM »

perhaps a highly perked Fairey Battle

Brenjen · « **Reply #4 on:** May 11, 2006, 04:26:10 PM »

The Condor? - (kidding) The HE111....hey how about the ground attack B-25 or the ME-410 - (not technically a bomber but I thought I'd throw it out there lol)

Bronk · « **Reply #5 on:** May 11, 2006, 04:33:53 PM »

A-26 now there is a bomber worth spending perks on.
Ju87-g or IL2 with the 37 mm.

Bronk

ridley1 · « **Reply #6 on:** May 11, 2006, 04:50:36 PM »

The B-29 has been beaten to death. I do not want to bring it up here. HT should put an end to the discussion on that plane and either say yeah, or nay to the super fort.

But you amass x number of bomber perks....ya gotta spend them, after all, that's the whole idea behind perks, right? Why only one option? This is what I'm talking about

How about the ordinance load is perked? Incendiaries instead of HE...burn the town down. The radio guided missile (whatever the designation was) that the germans had....

Hap · « **Reply #7 on:** May 11, 2006, 04:56:04 PM »

b-36 then?

~~hap~~

Brenjen · « **Reply #8 on:** May 11, 2006, 05:06:43 PM »

Quote

The B-29 has been beaten to death. I do not want to bring it up here. HT should put an end to the discussion on that plane and either say yeah, or nay to the super fort

He has, he said NO in rather bold type.

Quote

How about the ordinance load is perked? Incendiaries instead of HE...burn the town down. The radio guided missile (whatever the designation was) that the germans had....

Or the Anti-ship missle they had, that would make short work of a CV

ridley1 · « **Reply #9 on:** May 11, 2006, 05:19:10 PM »

They have Brenjen? Didn't know....

That's the unit I was thinking of....it was used for anti-shipping,

That I would pay good money for.

Torps on a Ju88 are useless

KTM520guy · « **Reply #10 on:** May 11, 2006, 05:23:51 PM »

It would be nice to something to spend bomber perks on. Anything. The AR234 is just a waste of good perks. I bet when the staff at HTC looks at all the work that went into the 234 they all say "Now there is a big chunk of my life I won't get back"

Treize69 · « **Reply #11 on:** May 11, 2006, 05:26:57 PM »

Still say a Lanc with a Blockbuster or Earthquake bomb would be worth the perks.

E25280 · « **Reply #12 on:** May 11, 2006, 05:28:45 PM »

Agree -- need more than one perk ride for the perks to be meaningful.

That goes for another Perk vehicle too, but at least the Tiger is useful . . .

ridley1 · « **Reply #13 on:** May 11, 2006, 05:38:23 PM »

Treize is on the same wavelength as me here....if ya can't have a new perked aircraft....get perked ordinance.

And as for 25280's comment....they should get a medium perk tank to bridge the gap between the tiger and the others....But let's not digress.

Bronk · « **Reply #14 on:** May 11, 2006, 11:57:11 PM »

like i said the ultimate perk buff is the A-26.
Attack AC with the Heavy bomber load out.

Perk it like a 234 and it would still be the most used buff in game.
Or how about the B-25 with the 75 mm gun.
I'd pay perks to fly that.
Just takes some imagination on ht part.
Also the B-24 should have a light perk.
Same defensive gun load as a 17 but with more ords and speed.
It makes the 17 more of a rarity.

Bronk