Author Topic: Announce: Aces Fight Figter Comparisons  (Read 2004 times)

Offline DoKGonZo

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1977
      • http://www.gonzoville.com
Announce: Aces Fight Figter Comparisons
« on: May 21, 2006, 12:54:21 PM »
This is the first release of a program I put together to use a really slick Flash-based charting module to show side-by-side comparisons of Aces High prop-driven fighters. Thanks to MOSQ, WideWing, and Hammer I was able to incorporate data for turn rate, acceleration, and lethality in addition to climb and speed information.


Aces High Fighter Comparison


The idea was to make it easier for newer players to get a handle on how the planes they were flying compared to the ones they were facing, and to assist in the decision of "which plane should I fly." And some of the information is pretty interesting to veterans too. And there's the ability to create direct reference URL's ... for things like scenarios where you may want to be able to present a page which compares the planes that'll be in use.

You'll notice I split WEP and MIL speed and climb charts out. This was for readability. Putting 8 plots on the same small graph just was too confusing to look at and that defeats the purpose. Putting things side-by-side lets you still see the performance gains of WEP, but more importantly it lets you compare the planes at the same power settings.

I put all the PHP code together in a couple of evenings, so there may still be glitches, I've set up a forum on my server to address these if they come up. The general look is kept pretty lean - no graphics except the actual charts - so it loads as fast as possible for folks.

    -DoK

Offline Xjazz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
Announce: Aces High Fighter Comparisons
« Reply #1 on: May 21, 2006, 12:59:28 PM »


Veeeery nice :aok

Offline OOZ662

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7019
Announce: Aces High Fighter Comparisons
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2006, 02:49:04 PM »
Shouldn't the P-47s all have the same firing time? I thought they all had the same ammo loads...
A Rook who first flew 09/26/03 at the age of 13, has been a GL in 10+ Scenarios, and was two-time Points and First Annual 68KO Cup winner of the AH Extreme Air Racing League.

Offline DoKGonZo

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1977
      • http://www.gonzoville.com
Announce: Aces High Fighter Comparisons
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2006, 02:52:01 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by OOZ662
Shouldn't the P-47s all have the same firing time? I thought they all had the same ammo loads...


Fixed.

Offline Hap

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3908
Announce: Aces High Fighter Comparisons
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2006, 02:53:14 PM »
Dok, wow.  great work.  :aok

hap

Offline OOZ662

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7019
Announce: Aces High Fighter Comparisons
« Reply #5 on: May 21, 2006, 03:06:45 PM »
That was speedy. :O
A Rook who first flew 09/26/03 at the age of 13, has been a GL in 10+ Scenarios, and was two-time Points and First Annual 68KO Cup winner of the AH Extreme Air Racing League.

Offline Shaky

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 550
Announce: Aces High Fighter Comparisons
« Reply #6 on: May 21, 2006, 04:09:10 PM »
Very cool.
Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

Offline pipz

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4899
Announce: Aces High Fighter Comparisons
« Reply #7 on: May 21, 2006, 04:52:44 PM »
nice work!

Pipz
Silence tells me secretly everything.
                                                                     
Montreal! Free the Pitt Bulls!!!!!

Offline DoKGonZo

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1977
      • http://www.gonzoville.com
Announce: Aces High Fighter Comparisons
« Reply #8 on: May 21, 2006, 06:16:04 PM »
Lordy ... I just realized how mangled the subject of this thread was ... I should know better than to attempt proper English before noon.

Scuzzy, if you can please change the thread to: "Announce: Aces High Fighter Comparisons" as it's been 120 minutes since posting and it won't let me edit it.

Offline hammer

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2198
      • netAces
Announce: Aces High Fighter Comparisons
« Reply #9 on: May 21, 2006, 07:26:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by OOZ662
Shouldn't the P-47s all have the same firing time? I thought they all had the same ammo loads...


That was probably my fault... I had times in there for 6 guns light ammo, 6 guns normal ammo, 8 guns light ammo, and 8 guns normal ammo. I had them all generically labeled P-47, but with 4 of them in a row they would have entered nicely as D11, D25, D40 and N.
Hammer

JG11
(Temporarily Retired)

Offline gatt

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2441
Announce: Aces High Fighter Comparisons
« Reply #10 on: May 21, 2006, 09:43:49 PM »
Great work Dok and others! :)
"And one of the finest aircraft I ever flew was the Macchi C.205. Oh, beautiful. And here you had the perfect combination of italian styling and german engineering .... it really was a delight to fly ... and we did tests on it and were most impressed." - Captain Eric Brown

Offline Tilt

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
      • FullTilt
Announce: Aces High Fighter Comparisons
« Reply #11 on: May 22, 2006, 06:24:30 AM »
Very usefull utility
Ludere Vincere

Offline Ghosth

  • AH Training Corps (retired)
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8497
      • http://332nd.org
Announce: Aces High Fighter Comparisons
« Reply #12 on: May 22, 2006, 07:24:52 AM »
Wow!

Talk about a world of information at a glance!


TY & dok, very nicely done indeed!

Offline Waffle

  • HTC Staff Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4849
      • HiTech Creations Inc. Aces High
Announce: Aces High Fighter Comparisons
« Reply #13 on: May 23, 2006, 12:09:06 PM »
Very Nice Doc

Offline Whisky58

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 289
Announce: Aces High Fighter Comparisons
« Reply #14 on: May 24, 2006, 06:48:45 AM »
Brilliant, easy to read/compare charts, turn radius especially.

Just one teeny, teeny, weenie, itsy, black mark on otherwise spotless presentation tho'.  For "England" it should read Great Britain or British.  I know it's nit-picking but there might be a few guys in Scotland, Wales & N Ireland who feel their contribution is devalued.

Great reference material :). Thanks.

Regards
Whisky