Originally posted by Dago
Oh wow, a big picture really proves a point. Gee, I am speechless. I am in awe of your powers of debate.
Pls do me a favor, dont post anything so asnine in the future, it only makes you look pretty stupid.
Still can't answer me or prove a point. Sad.
If there was a debate in the first place it existed only in your head.
Scroll back up the thread a few posts. A remark was made about "Fake but accurate" with a comment about "fair and balanced"
The F&B line made me think of the picture, so I threw in the "Faux News" from said picture. At that point you got your panties in a bunch about something. Exactly what I still haven't figured out. I posted the picture to show that I'm not making things up nor advertising a particular point of view, opinion or idea about any particular news agency.
I've watched all the major news agencies and have deemed them all pretty much equally worthless. Talking heads with breasts. In the case of anderson cooper...talking head with no breasts. You've seen them in action. Take for instance an "aviation crisis" such as JetBlue nosewheel or Nike's Gulfstream gear door. They don't have a clue about anything. Their experts don't have a clue about anything (Though one news agency did get Al Haynes...good job whomever that was) and they almost seem disappointed when the pilots do their job by landing safely. They seem like their ice cream cone fell onto the ground when they don't get a big fireball on live t.v.
Regardless of my opinion on politics, I don't like when news anchors say "we're winning" or "we seem to be falling behind" regarding elections. Just the same as I don't like ESPN's broadcasters showing favoritism when two baseball/football/hockey teams are playing. It's one thing for a Pittsburgh news station to cheer for the steelers. It's another for ESPN's anchors to cheer for the steelers.