Author Topic: Bush (Read 998 times)

Eagler · « **Reply #30 on:** June 09, 2006, 05:10:54 PM »

alright, who hid 68's meds?

68Hawk · « **Reply #31 on:** June 09, 2006, 05:57:30 PM »

Ha, thats funny Eagler.

I know it sounds crazy, and it makes me sound really crazy, but its true. Its something I've been researching for a couple of years now. The more I try to disprove it, the more evidence I find supporting it.

Like I said, look into it for yourself. Don't believe me. Look at the evidence.

Did you know that the FAA was running a drill with both live fly aircraft and false blips inserted on their radar as the events of 9/11 were unfolding? The government was litteraly running a drill for the exact situation that happened, while the drill was going on. This is one small, fishy piece of the puzzle. As I said before, Osama bin Laden does not have the power to schedule US military wargames (NORAD was involved with the drill too, in addition to other exercises pulling fighter cover away from the NE air defense sector).

I do not say these things in any way to make a hatefull attack on any individual, political party or ideology. I only ask Americans to take an honest look at the evidence and decide for themselves what they believe. We certainly can't trust any news recieved over the TV anymore, regardless of network. They are an active part of keeping this issue, and the volumous amount of credible evidence supressed.

Check it out for yourself, and please, for God sake bring me some meds! No, the green ones! Yeah, thats the one. AHHHHHH

GreenCloud · « **Reply #32 on:** June 09, 2006, 06:02:19 PM »

hawk you are a Kook..

btw Planes didnt hit the WTC..

it was controlled explsves...and they edited pictures on to TV..

LMFAO........................ .......wacko..stop smoking weed

Jackal1 · « **Reply #33 on:** June 09, 2006, 06:10:27 PM »

68, tinfoil on the windows will block out about 90% of those alien mind control messages you are receiving.
To take care of the other 10% may I suggest a tinfoil hat. There are some real stylish models on the market now. Our very own Skuzzy has designed a pretty snappy model for casual wear.

I hear the faint sound of a boat motor in the background. A trolling motor I believe.

moneyguy · « **Reply #34 on:** June 09, 2006, 06:11:22 PM »

you guys watch too much TV

john9001 · « **Reply #35 on:** June 09, 2006, 06:33:05 PM »

terrorists? what terrorists, i don't see no terrorists, boosh invented terrorists to make his oil buddies rich, wait till hillary is president, she will make the world love america.

68Hawk · « **Reply #36 on:** June 09, 2006, 06:34:56 PM »

Greencloud

I know you're trying to be sarcastic, but yes, planes did hit the towers, and YES explosives were used to bring them down. This has been confirmed by many different photo and video records of the event, in addition to seismic data and the eyewhitness reports of firefighters who were there when the towers start collapsing.

Why does saying this make me a kook? I would argue that anyone who accepts the official story without looking at the evidence is acting and thinking foolishly. If you look at the evidence and then dissagree with me, so be it, and I welcome your oppinion.

Also, what makes you think I smoke weed? If you're going to accuse me of using a drug that makes me crazy, crack would be a better candidate. Look into it for yourself, or don't, its up to you. I just wish more people would take a more critical and concerned interest in their government and the world around them.

68Hawk · « **Reply #37 on:** June 09, 2006, 06:38:18 PM »

Oh yeah, and don't forget:

Your government funded and trained Al Qaeda

Regardless if you believe that they are being funded by our government now, they were funded at the outset and much of the way along by the government so that they could fight the soviets in Afghanistan. Opium was not a large part of the Afghan economy untill the soviets invaded and the mujahideen needed to start trading it for stinger missiles.

Drugs are central to this issue, but not concering anything that I may or may not be smoking.

68Hawk · « **Reply #38 on:** June 09, 2006, 06:40:39 PM »

To John I say that the prospect of Hillary being president is almost as scarry as the thought of another Bush term (thank goodness for term limits). If Hillary is on the docket, I might just have to vote republican. Thats a tough statement for an anti-partisan to make. Remember that the core of both parties are beholden to the same interests. They are the same animal. Vote third party!

john9001 · « **Reply #39 on:** June 09, 2006, 06:47:24 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by 68Hawk
To John I say that the prospect of Hillary being president is almost as scarry as the thought of another Bush term (thank goodness for term limits). If Hillary is on the docket, I might just have to vote republican. Thats a tough statement for an anti-partisan to make. Remember that the core of both parties are beholden to the same interests. They are the same animal. Vote third party!

hawk did you know that binladen is boosh's second cousin? that explains allot. and they both belong to the Illuminati.

SaburoS · « **Reply #40 on:** June 09, 2006, 06:48:36 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by 68Hawk
snip~ and YES explosives were used to bring them down. This has been confirmed by many different photo and video records of the event, in addition to seismic data and the eyewhitness reports of firefighters who were there when the towers start collapsing. ~snip

Wrong.

"9/11 Debunking the Myths"

You just did not think it through.

You're seeing what you want to see, believing what you want to believe.

68Hawk · « **Reply #41 on:** June 09, 2006, 07:13:25 PM »

Ok, if Popular Mechanics is the best source you can find then I don't really know what to say. The whole article you linked is not only devoid of any scholarly documentation, but is riddled with falsehoods of its own. I'm not going to even address that article other than by the following:

The article claims that the jet fuel burned so hot that it weakened the structure of the towers and caused them to collapse. Why then are there pictures of people standing in the airplane holes in the side of the building before the tower's collapse? Why are there recorded radio communications of the firefighters reporting that the fires were mostly isolated and under control? Why did WTC7 fall in a perfectly controlled manner, and the lease holder admitted that he 'told the firefighters to pull the building'? Aside from that, the photo on the front of the article is not a photo that any one claims proves anything.

This isn't an issue of my thouroughness of thought. Neither am I wanting to believe anything. The more I look for hard and credible evidence that proves the official government story, the more holes I find.

Find some good evidence that the government isn't lying to us and I'd love to see it, but If you want to keep relying on shoddy journalism like that Popular Mechanics article you're only decieving yourself.

Jackal1 · « **Reply #42 on:** June 09, 2006, 07:58:39 PM »

SaburoS · « **Reply #43 on:** June 09, 2006, 08:44:04 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by 68Hawk
Ok, if Popular Mechanics is the best source you can find then I don't really know what to say. The whole article you linked is not only devoid of any scholarly documentation, but is riddled with falsehoods of its own. I'm not going to even address that article other than by the following:

The article claims that the jet fuel burned so hot that it weakened the structure of the towers and caused them to collapse. Why then are there pictures of people standing in the airplane holes in the side of the building before the tower's collapse? Why are there recorded radio communications of the firefighters reporting that the fires were mostly isolated and under control? Why did WTC7 fall in a perfectly controlled manner, and the lease holder admitted that he 'told the firefighters to pull the building'? Aside from that, the photo on the front of the article is not a photo that any one claims proves anything.

This isn't an issue of my thouroughness of thought. Neither am I wanting to believe anything. The more I look for hard and credible evidence that proves the official government story, the more holes I find.

Find some good evidence that the government isn't lying to us and I'd love to see it, but If you want to keep relying on shoddy journalism like that Popular Mechanics article you're only decieving yourself.

LOL, this is laughable.
Humor me and address the falsehoods of the article.
Perhaps you can be the hero of the free world and show us your scholarly documentation that proves that explosives were planted and detonated.
Basically showing that this was a, you know....a conspiracy.

As to jet fuel not being able to heat up steel to the point of weakening it and/or melting it......

How hot does wood or coal burn?

How about concentrating that heat.....

How about introducing more air via a thermal draft up a long chimney like or skyscraper like structure.....

How does a kiln work?

How oh how did they melt and/or shape metal in the middle ages cause wood or coal just doesn't burn that hot, eh?

If it was a controlled detonation and all this careful precise planning....why was the second tower hit the first to drop? Kind of poor execution, no?

Maybe the second tower with its plane damage lower, with greater weight on top, collapsed first?

Finally, tell me structure of the twin towers....what kind was it? What was unique about its design?

Look into these questions honestly and you'll come to a different conclusion.

Furious · « **Reply #44 on:** June 09, 2006, 09:07:43 PM »

reading is fun