Author Topic: CV idea...  (Read 2287 times)

Offline mussie

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2147
CV idea...
« Reply #15 on: June 14, 2006, 02:46:01 PM »
OH Gawd

There would be a sudden increase in illegal CV burnouts and Groundings

Offline F4J

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 84
Re: CV idea...
« Reply #16 on: June 14, 2006, 08:04:34 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
Let's face it.. they are about useless in the game right now but... for the few minutes that they last.....

They are probly the source of some of the best fights in the game.

So how do you make em last longer without getting too unrealistic?  

How bout.... they can't be sunk until all the escorts are dead?   This would stop the lone mouse weilding fluffer in his "box" of fluffs from taking out the entire fight with one no talent run on the carrier.  

Maybe a tiny bit unrealistic but... in the war... no carriers were ever sunk by heavy bombers anyway so what we have is pretty unrealistic also... fluffs are accurate and easy in the game so that the talentless can have their bank accounts harvested.... no problem but..  Why make it too easy for the girls?

On the other side of it... maybe something could be done to not allow CV's to get too close to the shore.

lazs
Public Relations Officer for the BK's


Excuse me, but explain why there would there would ever be any battle over a CV if it it couldn't be sunk. How many epic battles have you had over your HQ since they're almost impossible to kill now?

Question number two, isn't the point of furballing over the CV to defend it? Oops, that's an oxy-moron,...."point of furballing", it's purposeless, disregard that question.  

As a bomber pilot, I'll say that CV's are difficult enough to kill now. You fly long slow boring flights to get within sight of the CV only to have red guys jump you and shoot your bombers down, plus having the puffy ack take out one or two of your buffs.:confused:

Offline SuperDud

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4589
Re: Re: CV idea...
« Reply #17 on: June 14, 2006, 08:22:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by F4J
Question number two, isn't the point of furballing over the CV to defend it? Oops, that's an oxy-moron,...."point of furballing", it's purposeless, disregard that question.  
 

It's a game, it's all pretty pointless:aok  If I want to feel like I accomplished something, I'll go look at some pRon. I furball b/c it's fun.

Quote
Originally posted by F4J
As a bomber pilot, I'll say that CV's are difficult enough to kill now.  
 


As a former bomber pilot all I can say is you need to practice more as sad as that is to say.  I hardly bomb anymore but if I want a CV dead I can pretty much kill it at will with my lanc and drones.
SuperDud
++Blue Knights++

Offline Vad

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 474
CV idea...
« Reply #18 on: June 14, 2006, 08:36:21 PM »
Unsinkable CVs, untakable bases....

How about unkillable fighters with unlimited fuel and ammo? Furball forever!

:)

PS:
For those who can read only what was written - it's joke.

Offline Slash27

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12798
Re: CV idea...
« Reply #19 on: June 14, 2006, 08:54:51 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
How bout.... they can't be sunk until all the escorts are dead?   This would stop the lone mouse weilding fluffer in his "box" of fluffs from taking out the entire fight with one no talent run on the carrier.  

  Best thing Ive read on here all year.

Offline bagrat

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1936
CV idea...
« Reply #20 on: June 14, 2006, 09:10:59 PM »
how about simply not allowing bombers to control an entire formation, make the bomber more durable as to not get killed by one .5sec burst of 50cals

when it comes to attacking CV's with no intention of survivng all a formation of bombers means is "i have 3 lives"

but then again defending urself with a single bomber would be really tough

oh and kinda off topic but does anyone else feel that the cockpit shot effect should not effect bombers. (the effect where 2 rounds into the cockpit blow up the entire plane...)
« Last Edit: June 14, 2006, 09:13:22 PM by bagrat »
Last post by bagrat - The last thing you'll see before your thread dies since 2005.

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
CV idea...
« Reply #21 on: June 14, 2006, 09:15:47 PM »
How about increasing the volume of AAA? If you watch a lot of the old camera footage those guns are throwing up a veritable WALL of lead and flak.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline MOSQ

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1198
CV idea...
« Reply #22 on: June 14, 2006, 09:23:43 PM »
Good Idea and it needs both parts enacted:

1) Kill all the escorts first.

2) The CV must remain at least 20 miles offshore. That would also change the minimum LVT launch range.


To take it one stage further, LVTs would launch from LSTs (not CVs) that could break off from the CV group and with a few destroyer escorts move closer to shore. If all the LSTs are sunk then the base could not be captured by LVTs, but the air battle could continue from the CV while the attackers try to get a C-47 or M-3 into the town.

Offline Kev367th

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5290
CV idea...
« Reply #23 on: June 14, 2006, 10:24:20 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by MOSQ
Good Idea and it needs both parts enacted:

1) Kill all the escorts first.

2) The CV must remain at least 20 miles offshore. That would also change the minimum LVT launch range.


To take it one stage further, LVTs would launch from LSTs (not CVs) that could break off from the CV group and with a few destroyer escorts move closer to shore. If all the LSTs are sunk then the base could not be captured by LVTs, but the air battle could continue from the CV while the attackers try to get a C-47 or M-3 into the town.


1) Nope, CV should be able to be killed on its own.
2) Maybe in conjuction with your 'one stage further'.

Needs one change implementing ASAP -
Guns should not be able to be killed by any cannon rounds of any size.
Small ack guns should be able to killed by rockets.
Main cruiser guns and both cruiser and CV 5" should need eggs.
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T
Asus M3N-HT mobo
2 x 2Gb Corsair 1066 DDR2 memory

Offline MOIL

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1639
      • http://www.ltar.org
CV idea...
« Reply #24 on: June 14, 2006, 10:53:41 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Saxman
How about increasing the volume of AAA? If you watch a lot of the old camera footage those guns are throwing up a veritable WALL of lead and flak.

Ya think!!

Offline Sketch

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1351
      • http://www.arabian-knights.org
CV idea...
« Reply #25 on: June 14, 2006, 11:30:42 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by ded
1 shot with a 5" gun anywere near him would blow him to hell.

No way! :rolleyes:  
I have been playing a while bro, like 9 years. :aok

But like Saxman said... the wall of ack should be hitting these guys before they are even in their planes gun range of hitting the CV.  Way too easy to take down all the guns and make a CV ded and useless.
~Sketch~//~Arabian Knights~
Sketch's Gunsight Collection 2008
Sketchworks Arabian Knights Soundpack
~Oderint Dum Metuant~

Offline soupcan

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 291
CV idea...
« Reply #26 on: June 15, 2006, 12:16:49 AM »
you might get more support for your ideas LAZ

if you would refrain from the constant bashing of

buff pilots.

your whole point could have been made without

the "talentless" BS

IMO it makes you sound like an arrogant purr-ick
Addicted since tour 62.
news in game.
http://www.415thsquad.com/

Offline Oleg

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1000
CV idea...
« Reply #27 on: June 15, 2006, 01:38:41 AM »
Bombs must not damage ships (CV & CA at least) unless direct hit. This will be enough.
"If you don't like something, change it. If you can't change it, change your attitude. Don't complain."
Maya Angelou

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
CV idea...
« Reply #28 on: June 15, 2006, 06:26:53 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by soupcan
you might get more support for your ideas LAZ

if you would refrain from the constant bashing of

buff pilots.

your whole point could have been made without

the "talentless" BS

IMO it makes you sound like an arrogant purr-ick


But he is correct.  A Task Force can be neutered by a Lone A8, I know, because I've done it a few times.   But the "inevitable" diving bombers are entertaining.
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline CHECKERS

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1187
      • http://www.geocities.com/motorcity/1502/index.html
Re: CV idea...
« Reply #29 on: June 15, 2006, 07:05:23 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
Let's face it.. they are about useless in the game right now but... for the few minutes that they last.....

They are probly the source of some of the best fights in the game.

So how do you make em last longer without getting too unrealistic?  

How bout.... they can't be sunk until all the escorts are dead?  :aok  

Good Idea !

On the other side of it... maybe something could be done to not allow CV's to get too close to the shore.

Not to Good Idea,
I don't think their needs to be another side to it ! ,  CV's need to be able to close in  on Towns for shelling, making for raging ship/shore gun battles, along with the rest of the fight.

  Bob/CHECKERS
« Last Edit: June 15, 2006, 07:08:43 AM by CHECKERS »
Originally posted by Panman
God the BK's are some some ugly mo-fo's. Please no more pictures, I'm going blind Bet your mothers don't even love ya cause u'all sooooooooo F******* ulgy.