Hi Bruno,
>Fritz is shorthand for Friedrich so is ok to describe the 109F for example...
So did I think, too, but I just checked the site of the Museum für Post und Telekommunikation in Berlin, and they show "Fritz" as official phonetic code:
Telefonalphabet 1934
Anton
Bruno
Cäsar
CH: Charlotte
Dora
Emil
Fritz
Gustav
Heinz
Ida
Jot
Kurfürst
Ludwig
Marie
Nordpol
Otto
Paula
Quelle
Richard
Siegfried
SCH: Schule
Toni
Ulrich
Viktor
Wilhelm
Xantippe
Ypern
Zeppelin
Ärger
Öse
Übel
They have documented quite a few versions on their site:
http://www.tu-berlin.de/~gebrauchsanleitung/Buchstab.htmNote that there was a big change in 1934 for ideological reasons - biblical names were elimated because they were considered yewish.
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/TelefonalphabetSome more changes were the contraction of "Friedrich" to "Fritz" and "Heinrich" to "Heinz" (which was not that sensible phonetically), "Bernhard" was replaced by the linguistically related "Bruno". Then there were some new "patriotic sounding" codes in other places ("Kurfürst" and "Ypern" - the latter probably alluding to a popular WW1 myth).
It seems the changes of 1934 were rolled back after WW2, but somehow "Nathan" was an exception from that. I'm surprised to see that "Samuel" is supposed to be the official code (from 1950 on, and re-inforced by later standards such as the DIN 5009 from 1983), because I have never heard anyone use anything but "Siegfried"! Maybe if I had paid more attention ... :-)
To complicate matters further, the German phonetic alphabet is a civilian development dating back to 1903, and it may be that the military used a different version for some reason. Here is one that looks a bit strange to me, but refers to a numbered military publication as source:
http://www.gyges.dk/Operational%20brevity%20code.htmAs if that weren't complicated enough, different German-speaking countries had different versions of the civilian code, too:
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/radio/phonetic-alph/full/(I'm actually a bit suspicious about the accuracy of the various quoted versions as none of them is documented with a dated reference.)
Regards,
Henning (HoHun)