Originally posted by Slash27
Go dig up where I contridicted myself on "historical plane sets" and Ill agree with you. Assumptions dont count as facts btw.
OK you said
"Go ahead dig up when and where then current AvA staff made claim that all sets will be 100% historically accurate 100% of the time while always catering to a LW squads whims and wishes. I'll settle if you can find where its even implied.
Assumtions, personal bias, baseless accusations, and lies. You guys consider that a valid argument?".
From thread
http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=178786&perpage=40&highlight=historicly%20accurate&pagenumber=1Now you will reply with 100% being a caveat.
As to the personal Bias comment yup both sides.
You want to call it trying to be accurate . I jump up and down calling you on it.
Baseless accusations??? I was agreeing with only with kev on Spit MK entry dates.
Lies now you can go find something about this topic I lied about.
Hows that for a valid argument ehh.
Guys don't think I have something against the AvA staff. Cuz I don't. You all do a thankless job. We just have a difference of opinion. I get mixed information from the ava staff.. like this thread for instance.
Like I said in other posts on this topic either you strive to be accurate or you don't. Subbing for planes that are missing yup good call can work with it. But burring you heads in the sand and ignoring an AC that was actually used.... Come on .
Bronk