Originally posted by miko2d:
I.Q. tests are a measure of a person's intelligence - by definition. Hence the name "Intelligence Quotient".
You may argue whether the measure is correct but not what it is or supposed to be.
Also, my belief that IQ to be a good measure of intelligence does not in any way makes me any smarter. So I have no idea what you are referring to as trees and a forest in that case. Did you forget to type a post?
You are confusing trust of IQ with religion where believing is supposed to immediately change a person to the better. I fail to see the relevance of my beliefs on the subject of IQ to the opinion I ventured in this thread.
miko
Just HAD to to say something about this

I.Q. test results (i.e. a calculated I.Q. score from an properly calibrated I.Q test (most commonly WAIS - Wechslers Adult Intelligence Scale) is indeed ONE way of measuring what we call intelligence - this number gives a somewhat good indication (correlation) of what your future holds for u in terms of what u can accomplish academically. However, broken down into its (WAIS) subscales (i.e. comparing results of different tests in the WAIS battery) it says something about your current abilites within several cognitive categories, and is far more useful as a measure of someone's mental abilities. I have used WAIS a lot, but never ever had any use of a calculated I.Q. IMO it's only useful if no other data can be found or the patient demands it with a gun in his/her hand. I.Q. scores can wary 10-15 points based on what kind of mental shape you are in that day, if you have been on vacation recently etc. A high IQ score (135+) is probably a good INDICATOR that this person will succeed in an academic field (some 135+ people will of course fail to do that, being specially skilled dorks - it's statistics, not a personality analysis), a low IQ (< 75) is an indication that someone might be impaired in some way - it might be a mental problem OR it might be physical (ex. artritis).
Without subscale analysis it's impossible to tell... Definitions aside, I must say this: All people who has bragged to me about their (high) I.Q. has been unbearable idiots AND Stephen Hawkins would fail/do poorly on most I.Q. tests - I would trust my jugdement over any synthezised number any day.
--
Regards,

BigUC