Author Topic: Iran will not suspend atomic work, says official (Read 1471 times)

ghi · « **on:** August 20, 2006, 05:01:04 PM »

Iran will not suspend atomic work, says official

imop,the sanctions are not going to work., United States and Israel have no choices, but to strike the Iranian nuclear facilities , in next 2-3 months
Does anyone agree ?

Sandman · « **Reply #1 on:** August 20, 2006, 05:07:33 PM »

The United States has plenty of choice. Just like Iraq. We had a choice then also.

whels · « **Reply #2 on:** August 20, 2006, 05:07:34 PM »

B2's droping multiple MOABs

or the 5k bunker busters

Nilsen · « **Reply #3 on:** August 20, 2006, 05:20:11 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by whels
B2's droping multiple MOABs or the 5k bunker busters

Will sertainly solve that problem, but how many new will be created in the process? Just wondering.

Sandman · « **Reply #4 on:** August 20, 2006, 05:23:03 PM »

It doesn't solve anything. It simply delays the problem and hardens the resolve of the Iranians.

Rino · « **Reply #5 on:** August 20, 2006, 05:39:33 PM »

I suppose we could send Sandman over to negotiate instead.

Bronk · « **Reply #6 on:** August 20, 2006, 06:11:27 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Rino
I suppose we could send Sandman over to negotiate instead.

After that they would beg for a bunker buster.

Bronk

Maverick · « **Reply #7 on:** August 20, 2006, 06:34:41 PM »

Did anyone really think that they were going to suspend any more than north korea did?

CavemanJ · « **Reply #8 on:** August 20, 2006, 06:38:18 PM »

formal response by Tue, Aug 22.... isn't that the date they said they were gonna light up the sky?

Nashwan · « **Reply #9 on:** August 20, 2006, 06:54:02 PM »

No, Iran said it would respond by the 22nd. The "light up the sky" comment comes from an American who's guessing what Iran is going to do.

ghi · « **Reply #10 on:** August 21, 2006, 12:18:46 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sandman
It doesn't solve anything. It simply delays the problem and hardens the resolve of the Iranians.

And what can solve the problem? UN? Direct talks Washington-Teheran?
If US would try to open diplomatic relations , would be seen by Teheran like a weakness , i don't think they will give up diplomatic , and are close to building the bomb, or acording with some analysts they have it already

Sandman · « **Reply #11 on:** August 21, 2006, 12:30:53 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Rino
I suppose we could send Sandman over to negotiate instead.

There's nothing to negotiate.

A conflict with Iran is a conflict of choice.

Sandman · « **Reply #12 on:** August 21, 2006, 12:33:34 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by ghi
And what can solve the problem? UN? Direct talks Washington-Teheran?
If US would try to open diplomatic relations , would be seen by Teheran like a weakness , i don't think they will give up diplomatic , and are close to building the bomb, or acording with some analysts they have it already

I think Iran knows that keeping a few nukes around will ensure that discussions will remain more diplomatic than our involvement with Iraq.

They have nothing to lose and everything to gain by accelerating their nuclear program.

~Caligula~ · « **Reply #13 on:** August 21, 2006, 06:22:03 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sandman
I think Iran knows that keeping a few nukes around will ensure that discussions will remain more diplomatic than our involvement with Iraq.

They have nothing to lose and everything to gain by accelerating their nuclear program.

so everyone should just let them do whatever they want to do......maybe we should even let them take over checkoslovakia as well.

Saintaw · « **Reply #14 on:** August 21, 2006, 06:39:09 AM »

He is not telling you what to do or not to do, just stating how Iran sees it. And he is right too, bombing those facilities will amount to nothing on the long run.