Author Topic: Ark. Senator Says "Iraq WOULD BE BETTER OFF WITH SADDAM IN POWER"  (Read 1047 times)

storch

  • Guest
Ark. Senator Says "Iraq WOULD BE BETTER OFF WITH SADDAM IN POWER"
« Reply #30 on: September 10, 2006, 07:27:10 AM »
I have a cousin who used to reside in belgium.  she and her belgique husband emigrated to the United States of America last month.  They spent one month staying at my folks house as my parents were wasting good American dollars and part of my inheritance galavanting in the Baltic (they will be in helsinki next week).  I spent quite a bit of time with them and we discussed many topics.  I asked this question "why are Americans despised on the continent?"  the answer that I recieved was that europeans tend to be a little envious of us.  they envy our boldness and the envy our economy.

what do you little green euros say about that?  are you really a little envious or was he telling me something just to be polite?

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Ark. Senator Says "Iraq WOULD BE BETTER OFF WITH SADDAM IN POWER"
« Reply #31 on: September 10, 2006, 07:31:14 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by storch
I have a cousin who used to reside in belgium.  she and her belgique husband emigrated to the United States of America last month.  They spent one month staying at my folks house as my parents were wasting good American dollars and part of my inheritance galavanting in the Baltic (they will be in helsinki next week).  I spent quite a bit of time with them and we discussed many topics.  I asked this question "why are Americans despised on the continent?"  the answer that I recieved was that europeans tend to be a little envious of us.  they envy our boldness and the envy our economy.

what do you little green euros say about that?  are you really a little envious or was he telling me something just to be polite?


No envy here thats for sure. He may have been polite, or he may have felt that way. European folks are just as different as Americans. Europe is really not one contry but many countries.

storch

  • Guest
Ark. Senator Says "Iraq WOULD BE BETTER OFF WITH SADDAM IN POWER"
« Reply #32 on: September 10, 2006, 07:34:54 AM »
well you certainly all look the same to me.  :D  besides what does european union mean then?  common currency, common heritage e pluribus unum 230 years too late, n'est pas?

Offline SirLoin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5705
Ark. Senator Says "Iraq WOULD BE BETTER OFF WITH SADDAM IN POWER"
« Reply #33 on: September 10, 2006, 07:45:49 AM »
He's absoluttely right...I think the world would be a safer place too if GWB hadn't bought into Dick Cheney's pre-emptive invasion doctorine.
**JOKER'S JOKERS**

Offline Gunslinger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10084
Ark. Senator Says "Iraq WOULD BE BETTER OFF WITH SADDAM IN POWER"
« Reply #34 on: September 10, 2006, 08:53:44 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Mini D
I did not see "Iraq WOULD BE BETTER OFF WITH SADDAM IN POWER" anywhere in that article.

This is getting all too typical these days.


I thought it was in the title of the article itself but if you exclude that it was here:
Quote
Rockefeller went a step further. He says the world would be better off today if the United States had never invaded Iraq — even if it means Saddam Hussein would still be running Iraq.

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Ark. Senator Says "Iraq WOULD BE BETTER OFF WITH SADDAM IN POWER"
« Reply #35 on: September 10, 2006, 09:54:54 AM »
so what some of you are saying is that the iraqi people are hopless..

That they are ignorant, murdering religious nutjob whackos that can never be helped and are better off with an iron fisted tyrant who only murders a hundred thousand of em every year or so?

That giving these people the chance to run their own destiny is not a viable solution... that only a tyrant can beat the primitive fundamentalists into line with a reign of terror and....

That is all they deserve?

I am having a hard time seeing the compassionate socialist in this view.

lazs

storch

  • Guest
Ark. Senator Says "Iraq WOULD BE BETTER OFF WITH SADDAM IN POWER"
« Reply #36 on: September 10, 2006, 10:40:36 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by SirLoin
He's absoluttely right...I think the world would be a safer place too if GWB hadn't bought into Dick Cheney's pre-emptive invasion doctorine.
there is no way you could honestly believe that, given sadaam hussein's proven record of atrocities and genocide.  it's one thing to be a bush basher but to make that statement demonstrates either a blind faith lockstep belief with the moronic left, intellectual dishonesty, or both.

Offline Krusher

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2246
Re: Ark. Senator Says "Iraq WOULD BE BETTER OFF WITH SADDAM IN POWER"
« Reply #37 on: September 10, 2006, 11:33:29 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by tikky
nothing new about this...

Rockefeller: Bush Duped Public On Iraq
CBS News Exclusive: Ark. Senator Says Iraq Would Be Better Off With Saddam In Power
Sept. 9, 2006

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/09/09/eveningnews/main1990644.shtml



The Kurds would not agree.

Offline FUNKED1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6866
      • http://soldatensender.blogspot.com/
Ark. Senator Says "Iraq WOULD BE BETTER OFF WITH SADDAM IN POWER"
« Reply #38 on: September 10, 2006, 12:41:30 PM »
$300B to help the Kurds.  Awesome.

Offline Neubob

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2446
      • My Movie Clip Website
Ark. Senator Says "Iraq WOULD BE BETTER OFF WITH SADDAM IN POWER"
« Reply #39 on: September 10, 2006, 01:09:31 PM »
Every nation deserves the government it harbors, whether a benevolent democracy or a ruthless dictatorship. If they hated Saddam so much, they should have gotten rid of him themselves, or at the very least carried the bulk of the burden for doing so.

If and only if Saddam became a viable threat to the US, should we have gone in there and flattened him. And instead of staying around to turn Iraq into the America-loving, Walmart shopping, McDonald's-eating paradise that it will never be, we should have treated Iraq as an enemy, not an confused, mis-led ally-to be.

That 300 billion would have been better off in the hands of R and D departments of 100 high-tech firms so that in another decade, we can finally end our dependance on the Arab world and let them shrivel back into the sands from which they arose.

And our service men and women, who are all too often used as the rallying cry for thoughtless, largely useless military operations, are better off alive and at home.

Offline AquaShrimp

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1706
Ark. Senator Says "Iraq WOULD BE BETTER OFF WITH SADDAM IN POWER"
« Reply #40 on: September 10, 2006, 03:07:13 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
so what some of you are saying is that the iraqi people are hopless..

That they are ignorant, murdering religious nutjob whackos that can never be helped and are better off with an iron fisted tyrant who only murders a hundred thousand of em every year or so?

That giving these people the chance to run their own destiny is not a viable solution... that only a tyrant can beat the primitive fundamentalists into line with a reign of terror and....

That is all they deserve?

I am having a hard time seeing the compassionate socialist in this view.

lazs


Uh, were not saying that.  We're watching it happen everyday on tv.

Say a country were to come in and remove the U.S. Government, and its military infrastructure.  Don't you think the whites/blacks/mexicans, or rich/middle-class/poor would be fighting each other?  We have enough cults and militias in this country that anyone who wanted to fight could join one.

Offline Trikky

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 370
Ark. Senator Says "Iraq WOULD BE BETTER OFF WITH SADDAM IN POWER"
« Reply #41 on: September 10, 2006, 06:21:38 PM »
Iraq didn't even exist as a country until us Brits created it out of 3 handy chunks left over from the Ottoman empire after WW1. I think we may have even used gas here and there to encourage the Kurds/Sunni/*****es to live in harmony.

On the bright side, we sorted out the Eng/Scot/Irish/Welsh thing after a few centuries so it does work if you try hard enough.

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18205
Ark. Senator Says "Iraq WOULD BE BETTER OFF WITH SADDAM IN POWER"
« Reply #42 on: September 10, 2006, 06:48:03 PM »
the dems are just speaking to their base ..
you know the ones that don't give a rats arse about anything or anyone except themsleves & their next unemployment check ..
won't be surprised if they state next that social security/unemployment checks could have gone up 30% if bush did not attack Iraq for his oil buddies .. LOL
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline bj229r

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6732
Ark. Senator Says "Iraq WOULD BE BETTER OFF WITH SADDAM IN POWER"
« Reply #43 on: September 10, 2006, 06:51:01 PM »
Yah, it's not a natural country to be sure, but internal polls in Iraq show 70%+ do NOT want the country split up into sections--would LOVE to see an internal poll about whether or not it was a good idea to out Saddam---ya gotta figure the 16% Sunni slice of the pie was good to go with the status quo...not likley the rest...mebbe I'm wrong
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers

http://www.flamewarriors.net/forum/

Offline DiabloTX

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9592
Ark. Senator Says "Iraq WOULD BE BETTER OFF WITH SADDAM IN POWER"
« Reply #44 on: September 10, 2006, 06:51:28 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by FUNKED1
$300B to help the Kurds.  Awesome.


Actually it is.  Better them than the Katrina refuse-gee's.
"There ain't no revolution, only evolution, but every time I'm in Denmark I eat a danish for peace." - Diablo