Author Topic: I am penile deficient! (Read 852 times)

Ripsnort · « **on:** September 22, 2006, 07:31:20 PM »

According to this article:

Quote

This lens has to be up for one of the sexiest in all of photography (and I mean versions made by all the major companies). Big and heavy and as Phillip Greenspun might say, " A good remedy for the penile deficient." I don’t think anyone can call oneself a serious photographer without this particular class of lens. For this last point, it is not about size, weight or vicarious Lilliputian penile substitution. It is about image quality. In this one rather large-ist package we have the ability to replace four lenses (80mm, 105mm, 135mm, 180mm/200mm) for a price far lower then what it would cost to have all four lenses (even if comparing the new AF-S version)

http://www.camerahobby.com/Review-80200pro.htm

I bought this lens today. Between the BMW and this lens, I'm officially 12" long now.

Seriously, I really needed a f/2.8 zoom for these cloudy, rainy days coming up during football season.

vorticon · « **Reply #1 on:** September 22, 2006, 07:55:26 PM »

we know, 14" if you include the carpeted garage and copy-paste news articles.

Ripsnort · « **Reply #2 on:** September 22, 2006, 08:07:43 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by vorticon
we know, 14" if you include the carpeted garage and copy-paste news articles.

DREDIOCK · « **Reply #3 on:** September 22, 2006, 08:45:23 PM »

I hardly know a damn thing about those things yet.

but damn it sure does look nice LOL

Mini D · « **Reply #4 on:** September 22, 2006, 08:56:01 PM »

The guy I go shooting with has one hooked to his D200. He loves it.

Debonair · « **Reply #5 on:** September 22, 2006, 09:03:31 PM »

my 105mm F/1.8 will pwn u !!!!! (but only at 105mm)

Halo · « **Reply #6 on:** September 22, 2006, 09:10:31 PM »

Sorry, but I used to have a 500 mm Vivitar f5.6 for surf photography that was about 20 inches long with an uncircumsized lens hood. Finally got rid of it -- too much recoil.

Ripsnort · « **Reply #7 on:** September 22, 2006, 09:45:26 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Halo
Sorry, but I used to have a 500 mm Vivitar f5.6 for surf photography that was about 20 inches long with an uncircumsized lens hood. Finally got rid of it -- too much recoil.

Ripsnort · « **Reply #8 on:** September 22, 2006, 09:48:17 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Mini D
The guy I go shooting with has one hooked to his D200. He loves it.

That D200 is on my long term horizon but I'm still applying the defibulator paddles to the wife for the cost of this lens (Wait til she sees the price of the D200 body! Guess I could show her the D2Xs first, then the D200 price should make the shock impact less

).

I've been told that the D70s performs well with the AF-D, but the D70 was subpar for quickeness. Guess I'll be finding out sometime next week!

eagl · « **Reply #9 on:** September 22, 2006, 10:18:54 PM »

D80 might be a reasonable substitute for D200 if you need to upgrade from the D70... Half the cost of the D200.

Regular · « **Reply #10 on:** September 22, 2006, 10:24:33 PM »

Is that the kind they use to make porn mags???

dhaus · « **Reply #11 on:** September 23, 2006, 07:11:42 AM »

Yeah, that's what it looks like DURING the session. Before and after it fits into your pocket.

Furball · « **Reply #12 on:** September 23, 2006, 07:24:25 AM »

yoink!

Ripsnort · « **Reply #13 on:** September 23, 2006, 07:46:14 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Furball
yoink!

LOL Furby! I feel famous now that I've made your sig.

Nilsen · « **Reply #14 on:** September 23, 2006, 07:53:32 AM »

I was stupid enough to try the Canon 400D at my photo store today. Didnt take any pics with it there but I fell in love with it . I still havent done much with my Nikon but the 400D just fit my hands perfectly. I knew were everything was right away. If i can sell the D50 to any of my friends ill run down to the store to get it.

Anyone here drooling over that one?