Author Topic: Did you catch Clinton on Fox News? (Read 3371 times)

Chairboy · « **Reply #105 on:** September 26, 2006, 11:21:46 PM »

Of interest, a reporter asked the president today if Clinton's allegation was true that Bush had no meetings about dealing with Bin Laden and the Al Qaeda threat for nine months after Clinton left office, and left Al Qaeda intel for Bush. Bush's response? "No comment."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjB9uMUM6xI&eurl=

rpm · « **Reply #106 on:** September 26, 2006, 11:35:58 PM »

The reason Bush gave "no comment" was he didn't have Karl Rove's hand shoved up his arse like a puppet putting words in his mouth.

Thrawn · « **Reply #107 on:** September 27, 2006, 12:21:05 AM »

Right or wrong, Clinton is a god of discourse. And if anyone here had to argue with him, 99.999% of you would piss your pants as he made you look like a blithering idiot. My goodness but I would love to see him debate Bush.

Both Clinton and Fox chose to strive against each other in that forum. They both had agendas going into the "interview", I'm sure. I don't wish to argue the rightness of those agendas. I do, however, believe that Clinton powned.

Arlo · « **Reply #108 on:** September 27, 2006, 12:41:19 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Gunthr
I still havn't seen the liberal OUTRAGE of Clinton encouraging "that women" to lubricate that tobacco product- a cigar- in her vagina off the Oval Office, and subject the nation of kids to speculation about this, not to mention that obvious, mandatory CANCER warnings that were ignored. Dems were mum. Maybe they came out with global warming to distract the country...

oh, and it did piss me off when Bill and Hillary basically rented out the Lincoln Room to high campaign contributers, who were reported to be jumping up and down on the bed raising hell.

still, I agreed with a lot of Clinton's decisions while in office. But he knows he pretty much ruined any good he did by giving in to his addiction and getting caught... it wouldn't have been fun for him without the risk.

Maybe because the disappointment factor expected was indeed "moral outrage" yet the same people chastising others for not feeling such moral outrage can't seem to get all that worked up on things like torture or the failure to support and defend the letter and spirit of the constitution or creating a fiscal sinkhole regarding the national budget due to pride, cluelessness and a total lack of responsibility. There was plenty of disappointment exhibited by every Democrat I knew and many I didn't. But as far as it "ruining" all the good he did that's just a desire to want to find him lacking in comparison to Bush. That's just slinging and clinging to a delusion of grandeur for sake of not admitting they supported the village idiot to save face, I reckon. And blaming Clinton (and Carter and Johnson and JFK and FDR and ... and ... pick a Democratic president but leave Nixon and Reagan out of the dirtyness of oval office politics) for everything that happened on George's watch doesn't quite work as well as it used to. Six years of crap weighs more than a damp cigar, sorry.

lukster · « **Reply #109 on:** September 27, 2006, 01:15:50 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Pongo
Clinton owned the idiot.

Yes, she does.

ByeBye · « **Reply #110 on:** September 27, 2006, 01:18:20 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Pongo
Clinton owned the idiot.

Clinton was and is an idiot.

lukster · « **Reply #111 on:** September 27, 2006, 01:19:06 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Thrawn
Right or wrong, Clinton is a god of discourse. And if anyone here had to argue with him, 99.999% of you would piss your pants as he made you look like a blithering idiot. My goodness but I would love to see him debate Bush.

Both Clinton and Fox chose to strive against each other in that forum. They both had agendas going into the "interview", I'm sure. I don't wish to argue the rightness of those agendas. I do, however, believe that Clinton powned.

Clinton turns my stomach everytime I see his face or hear his voice. Why some can't see through his disguise I just don't understand.

ByeBye · « **Reply #112 on:** September 27, 2006, 01:26:41 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Thrawn
Right or wrong, Clinton is a god of discourse. And if anyone here had to argue with him, 99.999% of you would piss your pants as he made you look like a blithering idiot. My goodness but I would love to see him debate Bush.

Both Clinton and Fox chose to strive against each other in that forum. They both had agendas going into the "interview", I'm sure. I don't wish to argue the rightness of those agendas. I do, however, believe that Clinton powned.

Ronald Reagan is what you are describing. Clinton is just a liar and a fool.

Pongo · « **Reply #113 on:** September 27, 2006, 02:17:14 AM »

The amazing issue of the US effort against terror is that republicans would sabotage the US efforts against saudi arabia and their puppet al quido for political gain and money. The republicans started destroying the US for hate and greed during the clinton years and they are finishing the job beyond all imaginings. All that will be left of the US in a few years will be hate filled skin heads with puzzeled looks on thier faces when karl rove isnt telling them who to attack.

Eagler · « **Reply #114 on:** September 27, 2006, 05:51:52 AM »

^^^^^^^^
LOL LOL LOL

Arlo · « **Reply #115 on:** September 27, 2006, 05:09:38 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by ByeBye
Clinton was and is an idiot.

I'm not seein' you havin' the luxury of castin' a stone in that regard, currently.

Arlo · « **Reply #116 on:** September 27, 2006, 05:10:59 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by lukster
Clinton turns my stomach everytime I see his face or hear his voice. Why some can't see through his disguise I just don't understand.

Well that's rather ironical.

Debonair · « **Reply #117 on:** September 28, 2006, 12:08:04 AM »

Seagoon · « **Reply #118 on:** September 28, 2006, 11:44:11 AM »

CW: Now Mr. Chamberlain, a lot of people are saying that had you acted to decisively stop Herr Hitler after he remilitarized the Rhineland, when Germany was still weak, we could have avoided the Second World War, I know hindsight is 20/20...

Neville Chamberlain: Now you look here, I acted...

CW: Mr. Chamberlain if I could finish...

NC: No, you look here, I acted in the interests of peace, and why don't you ask this kind of question of him, ask him about Singapore, everyone goes on and on about Norway and France, but the single greatest military defeat in British history didn't happen on my watch. When I left, I left with the incoming government with a plan to defeat Nazism...

CW: Alright then, but what about Munich, peace in our time, the Phoney War? So many missteps...

NC: Oh aren't we all smirky and proud of ourselves for remembering "Peace in our time." Have you forgotten it was my administration that declared war in the first place, and that we fought it to stop Herr Hitler? Had Winnie not committed us to his disastrous "War in Asia" we'd have finished this mess by now. As it is we have troops all over the place. What on earth are we doing in the Far East anyway? Is that were Hitler is? I dare say not. The war there is a quagmire, a veritable bottomless bog. I say be done with it. Withdraw. And can we talk about unrestricted bombing of civilian populations... How many innocent German people have died so that...

CW: But what about...

NC: No, I know its all about you warmongers blaming the old administration for the current mess, but I only had less than one year to deal with Hitlerism, but how long has the current Prime Minister been at it hmmm? And every year its just a bigger and costlier war than the last. Maybe if fellows like the present PM hadn't been so set on stirring up that hornet's nest while I was working for peace, we'd never have had this war in the first place. National Socialism isn't inherently violent you know, I know that's how some extremists interpret Mein Kampf but...

CW: I'm sorry but that's all we have time for...

Gunthr · « **Reply #119 on:** September 28, 2006, 02:20:59 PM »

Quote

Maybe because the disappointment factor expected was indeed "moral outrage" yet the same people chastising others for not feeling such moral outrage can't seem to get all that worked up on things like torture or the failure to support and defend the letter and spirit of the constitution or creating a fiscal sinkhole regarding the national budget due to pride, cluelessness and a total lack of responsibility. There was plenty of disappointment exhibited by every Democrat I knew and many I didn't. But as far as it "ruining" all the good he did that's just a desire to want to find him lacking in comparison to Bush. That's just slinging and clinging to a delusion of grandeur for sake of not admitting they supported the village idiot to save face, I reckon. And blaming Clinton (and Carter and Johnson and JFK and FDR and ... and ... pick a Democratic president but leave Nixon and Reagan out of the dirtyness of oval office politics) for everything that happened on George's watch doesn't quite work as well as it used to. Six years of crap weighs more than a damp cigar, sorry. - Arlo

Arlo, President Clinton inserted a product known to cause cancer into a young subordinate's vagina to coat the tobacco leaves with a substance that would put some schtank on it and keep the cigar leaves from unravelling. (reportedly this made Hillary more angry then the slimy deposit left on Lewinski's dress. This was according to Lewinsky herself, when she was quoted by the Washing Post as stating, - "I am not a fat, cheesy slut.")

Anyway, any democrat I've ever spoken to about this does the same thing you did... try to minimize it, and deny any impact of the appalling incident on Clinton's governance, and point to the "evil" political beliefs of over half the nation as being far worse. Personally, I think Clinton was completely distracted in this phase of his presidency. Clinton knows it too, that is why he flew off the handle during the interview when posed with the question: "why didn't you do more?" The implication that he might have been distracted was too close to home. just my .02