Originally posted by lazs2
But... what does it matter? it could work out... you guys see me killing attackers or defenders... by your way of looking at it... I am "helping" My way of looking at it I am having a good time.. Point being, there are ways for the two groups to function together.
Where the animosity comes in is when the furballers are chastised for not bringing bombs or not going over to help this or that field or.... when the attackers kill the FH's or the CV where a good fight is happening.
any toolshed mission should have fighters without eggs to do the dogfighting. This is what frustrates me, as that furballers COULD join in, like they did in the old days, and help base captures. instead they whine the map hasnt got FT's.
Furballers would come in first, kill any defenders, then move on to next bases once the toolsheders have done there work... Moving on, would be to the next base which might supply the base thats under attack....
This is why festaMA sorta works out very well, because if you are attacking one base, the very next base is less than 10miles away, and defenders will up there. The furballers can have there fight infront of the main attack force. However right now, the main attack force rarely has fighter cover, so they resort to porking hangers, or milkrunning, simply because they havnt got a fully balanced attack.
Originally posted by lazs2
Now, you must admit.. that when this was brought up in the past.... the toolshedders all admitted that they were doing it and basicaly said "tough titty". They certainly didn't care about anthing but their gameplay.
Do you care about toolsheders gameplay? and if you say you do you are lying because its NEVER come across in any of your posts.
Originally posted by lazs2
you would also have to admit that for the most part... the whorde does not seek out the enemy whorde but instead.... milkruns.
Those were the types of behavior that caused so much of the rift and will continue to do so as long as they are employed.
because hardcore furballers wont do anything against it. Bases without defence deserve to be milkrunn'ed
Originally posted by lazs2
In EW yesterday... the enemy CV was killed at a really good fight.. I simply announced that "this fight is over gonna go find another" and... I actualy could.. there were several small fights with people just having fun.
I will never understand why the toolshedders will come to a fight that they had nothing to do with simply to kill it.... especialy when there are so many other places they could go..
It really does stink of "griefing" and you really can't expect people to be happy with a griefer.
lazs
Public Relations Officer for the BK's
because i bet that CV was nearing there base, and the CV driver's was aiming to capture the field. Isnt that the point of the game? You moan and moan about milkrunners, but when a base has a successful defence, you moan that the toolsheders ruined the fight? No they didnt they successfully defended the base. you are whining about BOTH sides of the arguement. You dont want the defence of the base killing the cv, but you dont want people milkrunning either.
what do you want?