Author Topic: Screw it - Time to cleanse the world of ALL Islamic radicals  (Read 2489 times)

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
Screw it - Time to cleanse the world of ALL Islamic radicals
« Reply #30 on: November 27, 2001, 03:51:00 PM »
Quote
We fight the same enemy, and if you see another way for more "humane" warfare, then, send your troops to Chechnya and show us, Asian barbrians how to wage war.
 

LOL!!

Really; that IS funny as hell.

You peasants don't have TV's in Russia?

Current score in Afganistan.. Taliban losses, @ 15 billion in equipment, one nation, and approx 15,000 Taliban fighters, approx 300 civilians.

American losses... None.

What else would you like us to show you??
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Screw it - Time to cleanse the world of ALL Islamic radicals
« Reply #31 on: November 27, 2001, 09:25:00 PM »
Ah, you put out more than enough propaganda in here Boroda, all by yourself. No need for any more from me.


 
Quote
Originally posted by Boroda:

My friend, we send 18 years old boys to that hell, in a desperate attempt to fight terrorists, not the whole Chechen people.


Sort of like we did sending boys to Viet Nam? Should we show the same support you showed us? Now THAT would be funny wouldn't it? But we won't do that to YOU the way you did it to us.

 
Quote
In Autumn, 1999, VVS was anxious to get an order and "flatten" that can of spiders with FAB-5000s. Like you did in Serbia.

Not at ALL like we did in Serbia. You need to review how many died in Serbia versus how many have died in Chechnya... because there IS no comparison and you know it.

It's really funny to listen about "human rights" for the terrorists from people who had no problem using napalm and carpet bombings..

But not NEARLY as funny as listening to you try to justify what your troops have done to civilians in Chechnya.

BTW, when was napalm prohibited by any treaty? Does the Russian military have a napalm-like weapon? How does carpet bombing compare to carpet artillery barrages for TWO MONTHS?


 
Quote
send your troops to Chechnya and show us, Asian barbrians how to wage war.

Did you happen to pay any attention at all to the Gulf War?

U.S. casualties: 148 battle deaths, 145 nonbattle deaths

British casualties: 24

French casualties: 2

Allied Arab casualties: 39


Estimated Iraqi Losses: (Reported by U.S. Central Command, March 7, 1991)

36 fixed-wing aircraft in air-to-air engagements

6 helicopters in air-to-air engagements

68 fixed- and 13 rotary-wing aircraft
destroyed on the ground
137 Iraqi aircraft flown to Iran

3,700 of 4,280 battle tanks

2,400 of 2,870 assorted other armored
vehicles

2,600 of 3,110 assorted artillery pieces

19 naval ships sunk, 6 damaged

42 divisions made combat-ineffective

Iraqi casualty numbers are highly disputed. Some claim as low as 1500 military killed, some 200,000. Many scholars believe a number around 25,000 to 75,000

Enemy prisoners of war captured: U.S. forces released 71,204 to Saudi control.


Are you watching Afghanistan?

Well, if you missed those, you'll probably get to see Iraq again.


Yes, indeed, we do have the same enemies. I have no problem with Russia exterminating Chechen terrorists.

But I'll be d*mned if the same guy who was accusing the US and crying about AFGHAN civilian casualties BEFORE the air campaign even STARTED...

is going to get a "free pass" on the brutal way his country kills civilians and military enemies alike.

[ 11-27-2001: Message edited by: Toad ]
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline fd ski

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1525
      • http://www.northotwing.com/wing/
Screw it - Time to cleanse the world of ALL Islamic radicals
« Reply #32 on: November 27, 2001, 11:16:00 PM »
Before comparing chechnia vs russia to usa vs afganistan, we need to remembre that usa does not border afganistan.

Makes lot of difference when hell is in your own backyard.

Toad, very website on which this link is hosted makes me rather dubious as to the content. Lot of this stuff can't be backed up you know...

Check this out:
"Private Jones: you tied a Taliban sniper to two toyotas with steel cables and ripped his apart. It was kinda funny to watch"

"Major Smith: Afganistan is too far from Geneva, we can do whatever we please."

You can make up toejam like that on a fly.

Someone please explain to me why is it that NA is capturing Chechens fighting for taliban those days ?
Are those bad chechens ? And good ones are left in Chechnia ?

Do you really think those people were supporting themselves in their fight to make another afganistan of Chechnia, against the will of most inhabitants ?

Do you guys see that war in the balkans was not as simple as "serbia try kill alabanians" ? I'm not saying they didn't, but lines between aggersor and victims there are quite hazy.
They are still building "Greater Albania" btw, kinda became a taboo since the Sep 11 came out and it turned out that KLA was sponsored by Bin Laden..
Anyone seens news from Macedonia lately ?

Come on guys, start comparing similarities, not differences.

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
Screw it - Time to cleanse the world of ALL Islamic radicals
« Reply #33 on: November 28, 2001, 10:38:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hangtime:


LOL!!

Really; that IS funny as hell.

You peasants don't have TV's in Russia?

Current score in Afganistan.. Taliban losses, @ 15 billion in equipment, one nation, and approx 15,000 Taliban fighters, approx 300 civilians.

American losses... None.

What else would you like us to show you??

Hangtime, I would like to see American war machine dealing with a terrorist state that has a nice habbit to attack nearby towns taking maternity homes (if the term is not correct - it's a place where pregnant women and new-born babies get medical treatment) as hostages.

What I meant - if European Counsil and other "human-rights lovers" are so desperate protecting "civilians" in Chechnya (they probably never heard such a term as "partisans", criminals according to any military laws) - they should send their own troops and try to establish law and order themselves.

Hangtime, I wanted to show you a beautiful article about Song Mi from www.kavkaz.org,  but looks like they understood it was too much even for their pile of roadkill and removed it. You protect them, but they hate you as much as us...

Toad, your impressive list of Iraqi losses must be extended with 150000 dead civilians.

AFAIK using napalm against inhabited localities.

Every time I see a Chechen interviewed on TV who says he and his family were under a shturmovik strike or under "grad" rocket fire it makes me laugh... Every broken wooden toilet is a result of inhuman Russian atrocities.

BTW, TV reports from Afghanistan look almost exactly like Michael Leschinskiy's programs about happy life of Afghan people in the 80s. Same faces, same speeches... Only without Caucasian-race soldiers wearing khaki panamas, helping Afghans to build schools and hospitals, looking as if they never have to carry their automats at all.

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Screw it - Time to cleanse the world of ALL Islamic radicals
« Reply #34 on: November 28, 2001, 12:51:00 PM »
Boroda, check the 'net.

There have been no precise estimates of civilian casualties during the war that I can find. Most estimates of Iraqi casualties from ANY "reputable" source have been broad ranging. Worst I've seen is estimates of Iraqi civilian death ranging from 100 to 35,000, some with a higher lower figure but lower high end, ie: "5,000--15,000 Iraqi civilians died during the war."

150,000 Iraqi civilians died DURING the Gulf War? I call BS. Prove your statement. Supply some sources.

Napalm against "inhabited localities? Like a city? Again, let's see your source. Otherwise, more "Borodaganda".

Fact is fact.. you guys are the absolute current champs at killing civilians.

Yet YOU were the first to jump on this BBS and wail and moan about how the US was going to slaughter hundreds of thousands of innocent Afghan civilians.

It just hasn't happened and EVERYONE EXCEPT YOU knew it WASN'T going to happen.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
Screw it - Time to cleanse the world of ALL Islamic radicals
« Reply #35 on: November 28, 2001, 01:26:00 PM »
Toad, prove your numbers of civilian casualities in Chechnya. Again the money for the fish?

Give me numbers please, I mean exact numbers, and then prove that were civilan losses.

I am bored of usual fakes with "rebels" killed in combat, with weapons in hands, that are presented as "civilian population" of Chechnya or Kosovo.

Also please count the number of refugees and victims of "Free Ichkeria" in 1996-99 when they were left alone. Such numbers from 1991-94 will never be counted, and if they will be - they'll sound too big for you "civilized" people to believe in.

Again: I just wanted to hear your voices shouting about "inevitable casualities" and "war with terrorism". I got what I expected. But, as usual, I see that some nations are more equal then others, and are allowed to kill civilians wholesale from 30000ft, no problems with public opinion.

Double standards in action. Russians are good when they help in Afghanistan, but there must be some reason to hate them for those who can read and know that there is no more "communism" in Russia any more. Very sad. Cold war isn't over. Same Brzezinsky's "human right" hypocricy all over again.

Where did I say US used napalm against civilians? I heard about such things, but it could be Soviet propaganda as well, anyway, people who saw it will never tell us anything like that Chechens under "shturmovik strike" (bombo-shturmovoy udar). You asked if napalm is prohibited - I named the certain condition. Why didn't you ask about carpet bombings? The thief's hat on fire?

Toad, you are an intelligent person, are you playing dumb or maybe it's just another lingual/cultural misunderstanding?

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
Screw it - Time to cleanse the world of ALL Islamic radicals
« Reply #36 on: November 28, 2001, 01:55:00 PM »
"Hello... McFly..??? (raps on McFly's head) anybody home??"

Wake up and see reality Boroda. We ain't Russia. We don't fight like Russians.

You are so wrapped up in your hammer and sickle envy you can't see any USA lead action on the world stage as anything other than a class action assault on your drunken lisping russian peasant heritage... which, I remind you, you are doing nothing to dispel.
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Screw it - Time to cleanse the world of ALL Islamic radicals
« Reply #37 on: November 28, 2001, 09:28:00 PM »
First Chechnya War - 1994-1996

"Estimates vary of the total number of casualties caused by the war. Russian Interior Minister Kulikov claimed that fewer than 20,000 civilians were killed while then-Secretary of the National Security Council Aleksandr Lebed asserted that 80,000 to 100,000 had been killed and 240,000 had been injured.


*****
 
Boroda, that's the RUSSIAN Interior Minister and Secretary of the National Security Council estimating between 20,000 and 100,000 Chechen CIVILIANS had been killed.. the RUSSIAN government.

*****


Chechnya and the Left

"The 1994-96 War

The Russian assault on Chechnya was terribly brutal. Grozny was more or less obliterated by bombing, and a hundred thousand refugees left the city in the middle of winter. About 80,000 people died in the war."


TITLE=CHECHNYA CASUALTIES


Many here fear a repeat of the Chechen war of 1994 to 1996.  That conflict left an estimated 80-thousand people dead, most of them civilians.


Civilian casualties of war in Chechnya

Research conducted by the Memorial human rights group suggests that as many as 2,000 Chechens may have gone missing after being detained by Russian forces...

Russian television today showed gruesome footage of 25 of the bodies - three of them women - laid out in a converted warehouse in Grozny waiting for relatives to identify the dead. Many of the badly decayed bodies had been mutilated. Some have razor wounds to their head and shoulders. Most of the dead had their arms bound together with rope before their death and many were blindfolded; some bodies bear the traces of gunshot wounds....

The corpse of Adam Chimayev was the first to be identified by relatives. His family was invited by an intermediary to inspect a group of bodies deposited at Zdorvye. After positively identifying Chumayev, the family paid $3,000 to Russian soldiers to retrieve his body from the village so they could hold a funeral, his widow said. The 38-year-old Chechen had not been seen by his family since Russian soldiers detained him on December 3 last year. Three shots to his heart area had killed him, and there were the marks of torture on his body, relatives revealed."


Charts of Total Deaths- Chechen & Russian Stats

Chechen stats show 40-45,000  civilians killed. Interestingly enough the Russian stats don't cover civilians.   :rolleyes:

The Second Chechen War -(1999-Present)

Chechnya-- Unknown, but civilian deaths are thought to exceed 50,000


Second Chechnya War - 1999-???

"The death toll is certainly in the thousands, including several thousand innocent civilians.


Killing Chechnya

"After almost three months of war, the badly mauled Russian army has established a tenuous presence in about three quarters of the Chechen capital of Grozny. But the cost has been enormous: over 5000 dead Russian soldiers, perhaps as many of as 15,000 civilian dead, most of them ethnic Russians....

.... To put the intensity of firing in perspective, the highest level of firing recorded in Sarajevo was 3500 heavy detonations per day. In Grozny in early February, a colleague of mine counted 4,000 detonations per hour.

 First Chechen War Background

"The war is also one of the great human tragedies of the post-Communist world. Deaths directly attributable to the fighting may approach 50,000, most of them civilians. "


******  

Wait.. I guess those were ALL "Chechen Rebels" right? No civilians in those numbers.   :rolleyes:

 
Quote
Boroda: I see that some nations are more equal then others, and are allowed to kill civilians wholesale...  

Yes, that is OBVIOUSLY true. YOUR country, RUSSIA has killed and is still killing Chechen civilians (Russian Federation Citizens, eh?) WHOLESALE. From 30,000 feet, from 15,000 feet, from 5,000 feet and from ground level.

...and YOU where the one who was accusing the US and crying about AFGHAN civilian casualties BEFORE the air campaign even STARTED...

Time to wash your own laundry.

Carpet bombings: If you are referring to US carpet bombings of highly populated areas (cities) since WW2, please give me the example.

If you're talking about VietNam, the B-52 Arc Light strikes (3 ship cell "carpet bombing"), IIRC, did not target cities.
Again, let's see what you've got.


 
Quote
FDSKI:You can make up toejam like that on a fly.  

Yes, the writer could. However, one would expect the LA Times editorial staff to exercise some oversight of one of their writers. It would be awfully embarassing to a major paper to be caught publishing a fantasy as news. Yeah, newspapers make mistakes. You think they would have published that without checking it? <EDIT> Also, that article is on numerous human rights sites, including Human Rights Watch. One would think they'd do some checking as well before republishing.


Besides, the main point here is BORODA.

Continually critical, continually assaulting the US as callous towards civilians...

... and yet his own country has perpetrated FAR GREATER civilian casualties in Chechnya than the US EVER did in the Gulf War or has currently done in Afghanistan.

He uses every "fig leaf" in the book to cover that... but it's simple fact.

As I said before: "But I'll be d*mned if the same guy who was accusing the US and crying about AFGHAN civilian casualties BEFORE the air campaign even STARTED...

is going to get a "free pass" on the brutal way his country kills civilians and military enemies alike."

[ 11-28-2001: Message edited by: Toad ]
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Screw it - Time to cleanse the world of ALL Islamic radicals
« Reply #38 on: November 28, 2001, 09:54:00 PM »
Oh, yes, Boroda.. I think you forgot to mention your sources for the number of Iraqi civilian deaths.


150,000 Iraqi civilians died DURING the Gulf War? I call BS. Prove your statement. Supply some sources.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
Screw it - Time to cleanse the world of ALL Islamic radicals
« Reply #39 on: November 28, 2001, 10:01:00 PM »
Yah know.. dating from even before the tsars, in russia; nothing was supressed more than the press.

So now, after centuries of disbelief in the printed media (during the commie era, justifiably) the russians STILL refuse to believe the press... theirs; ours, anybodys.

I think they must get their news from patriotic mosaics, posters and panoramas in their bus stations.
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline -lynx-

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 340
Screw it - Time to cleanse the world of ALL Islamic radicals
« Reply #40 on: November 29, 2001, 06:59:00 AM »
Quote
LOL!!

Really; that IS funny as hell.

You peasants don't have TV's in Russia?

Current score in Afganistan.. Taliban losses, @ 15 billion in equipment, one nation, and approx 15,000 Taliban fighters, approx 300 civilians.

American losses... None.

What else would you like us to show you??
 
Jeepers Hang - do you ever speak not from your arse you dolp? Which part of "it's difficult to hit a B52 at 30,000 feet from an AK-47 on the ground" you find particularly confusing?  
Quote
"Hello... McFly..??? (raps on McFly's head) anybody home??"
Wake up and see reality Boroda. We ain't Russia. We don't fight like Russians.  
Oh yes indeed pal - you don't. In this war you use somebody else's hands to do the dirty work of fighting and dying. Is there anybody home in your head? Or do you think it was the Marines how took Kabul? Better still - at least there were frontlines to bomb - what would you do if there weren't?

You are the worst example why people may dislike Americans - dumb, arrogant and eager to brag about things you contributed nothing towards. Oh yeah - you can't even f**king spell.  :mad:

Offline -lynx-

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 340
Screw it - Time to cleanse the world of ALL Islamic radicals
« Reply #41 on: November 29, 2001, 07:21:00 AM »
Quote
It would be awfully embarassing to a major paper to be caught publishing a fantasy as news. Yeah, newspapers make mistakes. You think they would have published that without checking it? <EDIT> Also, that article is on numerous human rights sites, including Human Rights Watch. One would think they'd do some checking as well before republishing.
 
Toad - and they would check it exactly how? And who's ever questioned this - 99.99% of readers don't even know where Chechnya is? It's OK to bash the Russians cuz they're baaaad. Have been for years - russkies, commies, whatevers.

Now in a funny twist of fate you are getting the same crap and - guess what? - from the same sources. Remember the prison full of captured fanatics who decided the dying is still gonna put them onto a martyrdom path? Yep, that one. The very same one US forces bombed for 3 days. With me on this one? Surely you know the place where your very first KIA died? (Don't remember his name but may he RIP  :()
And you know what's happening now? I'll tell ya - all those peace-loving gun-hating liberal fighters for god-knows-what rights are accusing the US and Northern alliance in indiscriminate killing of POWs... Tsk-tsk-tsk - ~55 years ago in Nuremberg people
hung for that.

And the reporters are going on about twisted bodies (bodies are removed now - somebody's trying to hide the evidence - blah-blah-blah...) and disproportionate response and violation of Geneva convention and... And what is a proportionate response to a person who's hating your guts because his religion tells him to and is bent on dying and taking as many of you as he can with him? Read him his rights and ask him to behave like a "proper POW"? Oh please.

Why can't you see that you're the victim of the very same propaganda you're accusing Boroda in but from a different side? The Russians can do no right. Period?

I'm not saying at all that they are perfect in every respect but surely not everything they do is baaaad?

[ 11-29-2001: Message edited by: -lynx- ]

Offline Dead Man Flying

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6301
Screw it - Time to cleanse the world of ALL Islamic radicals
« Reply #42 on: November 29, 2001, 07:24:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by -lynx-:
Oh yes indeed pal - you don't. In this war you use somebody else's hands to do the dirty work of fighting and dying. Is there anybody home in your head? Or do you think it was the Marines how took Kabul? Better still - at least there were frontlines to bomb - what would you do if there weren't?


Who can argue with success?  Clearly the strategy of using Northern Alliance troops as proxy was a successful strategy.  Do you honestly believe that if the United States had used ground troops to do the same thing that it would have been any less effective?  The Northern Alliance were both willing and able to act as proxy forces with the assistance of American air power; if they hadn't been, Alliance ground troops undoubtedly would have met with similar success.

 
Quote
You are the worst example why people may dislike Americans - dumb, arrogant and eager to brag about things you contributed nothing towards. Oh yeah - you can't even f**king spell.   :mad:

And you're a common example of knee-jerk anti-Americanism.  I find it truly fascinating that somebody would consider the United States cowardly or anything but intelligent in its short term Afghanistan strategy.  Plus, as long as Hangtime's tax dollars have gone toward paying for the training and equipping of our military, he's contributed more than you have toward the war effort, even if indirectly.

-- Todd/Leviathn

Offline -lynx-

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 340
Screw it - Time to cleanse the world of ALL Islamic radicals
« Reply #43 on: November 29, 2001, 08:13:00 AM »
Quote
if they hadn't been, Alliance ground troops undoubtedly would have met with similar success.
 
Check the history of Soviet war in Afganistan and effectiveness of regular troops vs. fanatics who are infinitely more knowledgeble about local terrain and want to die. Or better still - reread the history of Afganistan and all efforts to subdue it with a foreign troops. Believing that any foreign troops "would have met with similar success" is simply naive. The US led coalition are extremely lucky that there was (future will tell whether for good or bad) an organised, armed and ready to fight ground force made up of teh Afgans themselves. Even better was the fact that many in Northern Alliance came from under Taleban and knew very well what they were fighting against.

If you believe me a knee-jerk anti-American - I can't argue with that since you obviously can't reason. If you could  you'd have seen that Hang's contribution to the war effort would be shutting his mouth on the subject he's got no clue about and keeping it shut.

But I dare say that through that very source you refer to - tax dollars or, in my case, tax pounds - I have contributed to the war effort and will continue to do so in the future in no lesser degree than Hangtime.

[ 11-29-2001: Message edited by: -lynx- ]

Offline Dead Man Flying

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6301
Screw it - Time to cleanse the world of ALL Islamic radicals
« Reply #44 on: November 29, 2001, 08:37:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by -lynx-:
Check the history of Soviet war in Afganistan and effectiveness of regular troops vs. fanatics who are infinitely more knowledgeble about local terrain and want to die.


The Northern Alliance doesn't strike me as fanatical.  Nor for that matter do the large numbers of Taliban defectors who would rather live than die for an obviously lost cause.

 
Quote
Or better still - reread the history of Afganistan and all efforts to subdue it with a foreign troops. Believing that any foreign troops "would have met with similar success" is simply naive.


Reread your history as well and note that previous incursions into Afghanistan by foreign troops have been to conquer and subjugate the nation.  Such an effort surely unifies all of the splintered ethnic and tribal groups toward a common goal of repelling the invaders.  Current American goals in Afghanistan clearly involve neither conquest nor subjugation; if anything, liberation of the Afghan people from the Taliban was a secondary mission objective.  The happy faces of Kabul citizens freed from the tyranny of the Taliban demonstrates that there was no anti-invader unity.  My main hope now is that these same people won't suffer under similar tyranny from Northern Alliance warlords.

 
Quote
The US led coalition are extremely lucky that there was (future will tell whether for good or bad) an organised, armed and ready to fight ground force made up of teh Afgans themselves. Even better was the fact that many in Northern Alliance came from under Taleban and knew very well what they were fighting against.


So organized that for five years they consistently lost ground, were ill-equipped, poorly-trained, and otherwise barely a match for the Taliban?  How much understanding did it take to march into a relatively empty Mazar-e-Sharif that had been abandoned by the Taliban prior to any major Northern Alliance advances?  I don't want to shortchange these guys... it's clear they were a lot tougher than anybody gave them credit for, but it's also clear that a great deal of this toughness came with the assistance of American airpower.  In its absence, this very same fighting force was barely treading water against the Taliban.

 
Quote
If you believe me a knee-jerk anti-American - I can't argue with that since you obviously can't reason. If you could  you'd have seen that Hang's contribution to the war effort would be shutting his mouth on the subject he's got no clue about and keeping it shut.


Obviously I can't reason.  I should just shut my mouth and keep it shut, I suppose.  LOL.

 
Quote
But I dare say that through that very source you refer to - tax dollars or,in my case - tax pounds - I have contributed to the war effort and will continue to do so in the future in no lesser degree than Hang.

Well, technically speaking you are contributing to a lesser degree since a higher percentage of American tax dollars are spent on defense than the UK's, and the United States represents a vast majority of the military forces in play in Afghanistan.  But I digress.   :)  We're all contributing to this war effort in our own ways, be it through taxes, prayers, letters of support, or whatnot.  We can't all go volunteer for the Marines tomorrow, but we there's nothing wrong with showing support for the military without being part of it.

-- Todd/Leviathn