Author Topic: Will the ACLU will fix this one?  (Read 1368 times)

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
Will the ACLU will fix this one?
« Reply #45 on: October 29, 2006, 10:40:36 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Urchin
OMG!  Insert DISGUSTED EYE FACE THING.  

I thought the constitution was a "living breathing document", to be interpreted according to the context of the environment we live in?  

Don't you people GET IT?  The terrorists are EVERYWHERE.  They are waiting in little Suzy's 6th grade class...  They are waiting for you LIBRULS to DEMOLISH any attempt at enforcing safety in the schools, and when you are done undermining our democracy with your terrorist-loving traitor Democrat ways, THEY WILL STRIKE!  

Don't you want the US to be victorious in Iraq?  I swear, you'd think this was a jihadist message board, looking at all these defeatist Democrat whiny nitpicking posts...


Even your other post was sarcastic.   Beautiful Urch!  <>
-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
Will the ACLU will fix this one?
« Reply #46 on: October 29, 2006, 10:43:06 PM »
is this the one where the cops used broomsticks to perform full cavity searches on preschoolers?

:confused:
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline x0847Marine

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1412
Will the ACLU will fix this one?
« Reply #47 on: October 29, 2006, 11:11:53 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by VOR
I can't think of a scenario that would justify patting every kid down in the first place.


Since it was a drill, technically the officers should not have touched anyone unless the parents agreed to let their kid participate.

During a live fire incident.. Gunmen / evidence / accomplices/ unaccounted for requires eveyone be checked for weapons...  There's the possibility one of the kids is an armed suspect, or just picked up a gun (evidence) left behind, which happens...  besides a coursery search (pat down over the clothing for weapons) is just good officer safety when looking for an armed suspect, keeps from getting shot in the back.

A coursery search of the public is 100% legal during detention, not training. We did these drills, but used volunteer kids who had written permission... otherwise we called it a raid. The HMFIC dropped the ball by not ensuring the school knew it was a drill.

Offline lasersailor184

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8938
Will the ACLU will fix this one?
« Reply #48 on: October 30, 2006, 12:12:20 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Stringer
I've seen the pictures you have posted of yourself here.  If you did intimidate anyone, then they were truly idiots.


Hardly.  Some of the most intimidating people are those you would never even consider twice to be powerful.
Punishr - N.D.M. Back in the air.
8.) Lasersailor 73 "Will lead the impending revolution from his keyboard"

Offline wrag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3499
Will the ACLU will fix this one?
« Reply #49 on: October 30, 2006, 04:50:46 AM »
Against this sort of thing 110%!!!!!!!!!!

Who is being trained here?  The kids?

Saw someone use the ... so what do you have to fear thing...........

Not the point!  What right do they have to do this?

If you let them do this it will only get worse in the future.

A promise was made that law enforcement would NEVER go door to door confiscating firearms.

New Orleans................  And they still have not returned the guns they took.  IMHO that is theft!  Hope a legal type takes them to court for stealing private property!

(IIRC something very much like that happened in N.J. about 10 years ago).
It's been said we have three brains, one cobbled on top of the next. The stem is first, the reptilian brain; then the mammalian cerebellum; finally the over developed cerebral cortex.  They don't work together in awfully good harmony - hence ax murders, mobs, and socialism.

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
Will the ACLU will fix this one?
« Reply #50 on: October 30, 2006, 06:40:05 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lasersailor184
Hardly.  Some of the most intimidating people are those you would never even consider twice to be powerful.


Nuke's alter ego?   I think so.
-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline lukster

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2581
Will the ACLU will fix this one?
« Reply #51 on: October 30, 2006, 07:37:20 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Shamus
Lukster, did a bit of googleing and cant find an answer to your question.

I did find where they just hired the chief in may by a 7-0 vote of the city counsel. If the party affiliations of the counsel are important to you let me know, i will make a few calls and find out.

Curious tho, if I find that the repubs are in the majority shall we blame the party for this?

shamus


Let's blame the individuals responsible and no one else. I really don't care if they are Republican or Democrat and I only brought that up because there seems to be an attempt to blame the president's security policies.

Offline Chairboy

  • Probation
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8221
      • hallert.net
Will the ACLU will fix this one?
« Reply #52 on: October 30, 2006, 07:40:43 AM »
You never did tell us where that attempt was.  You were the first person to mention Bush or Republicans, ironically, in a message stating that you thought we were all trying to blame it on them.  I think you might have confused this thread for another.
"When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Offline lukster

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2581
Will the ACLU will fix this one?
« Reply #53 on: October 30, 2006, 07:42:13 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Thrawn
lukerster, if you are AKIron why the different nic?


I was away from this board for a while, multiple reasons, I was never a png. When I decided to come back my akiron account was inactive. This was my first account and it was not inactive. I used it. Since then Skuzzy enabled my akiron account but since I am not presently flying with the aks I continue to use this one.

Offline lukster

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2581
Will the ACLU will fix this one?
« Reply #54 on: October 30, 2006, 07:45:08 AM »
Chairboy, note your use of the word "conservative" and the word "they". Are you saying you aren't blaming this on Republicans? Now, note my use of the word "disingenuous".

Quote
Originally posted by Chairboy
Sadly, I think there are plenty of folks on this board who see no problem with this incident.  These are the same people who will on one side argue that they are the true patriots, that their party is truly conservative and they oppose big government, but then they'll turn around and rationalize this police drill as necessary for safety.  Maybe one or two of them will blame this on the mexicans for good measure.

Offline lukster

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2581
Will the ACLU will fix this one?
« Reply #55 on: October 30, 2006, 07:48:11 AM »
I refuse to hit my head against the wall more than once Chairboy. I am saying that you were the first to assign blame to a broad group of people but I won't keep saying it every time you post something contrary.

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13920
Will the ACLU will fix this one?
« Reply #56 on: October 30, 2006, 08:04:03 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by x0847Marine

A coursery search of the public is 100% legal during detention, not training. We did these drills, but used volunteer kids who had written permission... otherwise we called it a raid. The HMFIC dropped the ball by not ensuring the school knew it was a drill.


Just a bit of clarification here. The HMFIC that dropped the ball happens to be the school itself. The Dept. and Officers were under the impression that the school had notified the parents and students beforehand about the drill. Read the last paragraph of the article.

FWIW the students do not have 4th amendment rights to anything in the school. They are neither owners of, renters of nor tennents of the school. AQs such the only responsible party for the search of the school is the principal or other designated representative of the school. They can and do give permission to search a classroom, locker or any other part of the school at their discression by Police or Fire personnel. This is up to and includes backpacks, purses, fanny packs lunch bags, etc. brought on campus by a student. There is normally a sign at the entrance of the school advising anyone entering campus is giving tacit permission to "search" any container brought on campus by the entrant. A "pat down" search for weapons is also not a "protected" 4th amendment "search" as part of a normal or unusual situation contact with a person by LE personnel.

In a similar situation I was advised that using a locker at the Department locker room, using a desk or any other facility of the Department also meant I was giving "implied concent" to search those items including anything I brought into the building. That was all the way back in 1976.

The same reasoning applied then and does now since I did not have a residential interest in the property any more than I did when I was in Highschool prior to that. I had been told about and saw that searches of lockers in my HS were authorized and conducted by school personnel with LE folks standing by to take any legal action necessary by the result of the search. This was in the late 60's and very early 70's. As you can see, searching the school grounds is not a new thing.

If you want to blame someone about this kind of drill blame the two idiots responsible for the columbine situation and all the "copycats" who continue to do similar things to get the "attention" or "revenge" they desire.

You may now continue your rants against the evil "establishment". Actually this is rather like a blast to the past in the early 70's with the "establishment" putting all the flower children (and kids in general) "down" for a real "bummer", man. "Power to the people", dude!!! :rolleyes:
« Last Edit: October 30, 2006, 08:07:27 AM by Maverick »
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13920
Will the ACLU will fix this one?
« Reply #57 on: October 30, 2006, 08:09:42 AM »
Lasersailor and Masherbrum,

Nuke is back as byebye. Thought you'd like to know. Proof is here: http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=190927:p
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline Dinger

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1705
Will the ACLU will fix this one?
« Reply #58 on: October 30, 2006, 12:38:35 PM »
Maverick's on this one:

The principal clearly dropped the ball, and is a moron to boot. A "training episode" like this don't work unless people are cued in, and you're training a plan.

Since the principal apparently unilaterally acted for this "drill", and only informed teachers moments before the exercise, nobody got any training. A bunch of students got terrorized.

The ACLU isn't needed here. The principal is gonna get s-canned mighty quick. Hell, even the cops are pissed off at him.

Offline x0847Marine

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1412
Will the ACLU will fix this one?
« Reply #59 on: October 30, 2006, 06:35:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Maverick
Just a bit of clarification here. The HMFIC that dropped the ball happens to be the school itself. The Dept. and Officers were under the impression that the school had notified the parents and students beforehand about the drill. Read the last paragraph of the article.

 


I disagree, the school isn't responsible for the officers actions. The police supervisor on scene (HMFIC) should have stopped the exercise upon learning the students were not willing participants, its unethical to pat people down which COULD lead to their arrest while "training".

Its either training or official business, there's no in between... "officially" anyway.

The whole incident wreaks; sloppy planning by the school and poor execution by the PD.