No, Moore.
What you posted was about the FAA was how they define what a ground loop is, and the apparent symptoms of it.
"Any difference between the direction the airplane is traveling and the direction it is headed will produce a moment about the pivot point of the wheels, and the airplane will tend to swerve.
Loss of directional control may lead to an aggravated, uncontrolled, tight turn on the ground, or a ground loop. The combination of inertia acting on the CG and ground friction of the main wheels resisting it during the ground loop may cause the airplane to tip or lean enough for the outside wingtip to contact the ground, and may even impose a sideward force that could collapse the landing gear.
Both of above has
NOTHING to do with what you are arguing, nor does it have anything to do with your mal-informed attempt to redefine what a "ground loop" is according to your own misunderstanding.
Many people have accurately pointed out that the above phenomena described does happen in this game, and quite frequently so. You think you're the only one who has an actual experience in planes? HT himself is a pilot, he's been in taildraggers, flew a P-51, and not to mention many more pilots both commercial and ex-military careers are playing this game as well. If they ever read the BBS I can bet both my nuts that they'd contradict every word you are saying.
What you contend is that a GL does not exist in AH, which it does, and in order to fabricate your delusion you bring up this peculiar segment of an opinion which goes;
Moreover, a real groundloop cannot be controlled with rudder even if the wingtip is not touching the ground. You are pretending that not only is a groundloop caused by a wing dip, but that there is no groundloop without wing dipping. You have no idea what you're talking about.
At any time before you had dipped your wing, you could have stopped the yaw by adding opposite rudder. In a real groundloop, you cannot stop the yaw, even if the wing does not strike the ground. A ground loop is caused by inertia due to the center of gravity being behind the wheels. Once begun, it cannot be stopped.
Your image of the ground loop, like so many things you've contended over these boards according to your
"years of experiencing living as a flight-sim BBS troll", is a false one loosely based on reality, propagated by your own misunderstanding and bigotry.
A ground loop is not a supernatural intervention of the devine. It can be stopped, and most pilots in the game both instinctively and actively take precautions to avoid it, hence its rarity in the game. The motion of a ground loop caused by both friction, torque, CG, and inertia of the plane is a physical one - and it is easily compensated by the use of both rudder and tail wheel locks.
Your "scenario" is a myth you've created inside your mind. This "unstoppable" image of the ground loop is valid
only after it has been aggravated enough to cause total instability in the yaw movement of the plane.
So tell me, Moore.
How can a tail dragger plane using low or smooth throttle setting, can just roll a few meters, swerve a few degrees left due to torque, and then just suddenly go into a tight turn by itself? The very premise of a taxiing slowly indicates a low throttle setting - hence low torque.
The only instance where a plane might do what you've absurdly described in your scenario;
You are travelling down the runway at a fairly slow speed, and you allow your nose to swing several degrees to the left. You compensate with rudder, but it is too late; in spite of your holding full right rudder, the nose continues to swing left until the aircraft has completed a one hundred and eight degree turn, and is now travelling slowly backwards for a few seconds.
.. is when a plane is inherently flawed at its design so its level balance is upset to either left or right side, thereby causing the weight to anchor on one of the main gears, and the plane pivots upon it. A recipro plane swerves because of propwash and torque - uncontrolled movement while ground level acceleration aggravates the inertia, and hence the "swerve".
Your mythical image of the "unstoppable ground loop" is a phase in which a plane has already entered into a critical state - of course its unstoppable.
However, you are suggesting that a "ground looping" movement exists, where even in its most meager initial stages, is unstoppable from the very beginning. A crock of
BULLSHI*, if I ever saw one.
ps) then again I see a lot of those coming from you lately.
