Author Topic: Poll: Complex Engine Management  (Read 4131 times)

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Poll: Complex Engine Management
« Reply #60 on: January 12, 2007, 07:55:03 PM »
No.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Wolf14

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 858
Poll: Complex Engine Management
« Reply #61 on: January 12, 2007, 07:57:02 PM »
No

Offline Angry Samoan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1104
Poll: Complex Engine Management
« Reply #62 on: January 12, 2007, 08:04:50 PM »
Mhai , Nei , Không , nyet , Bo, Iie , Yox , Nope , Uh-uh , neg ,

NO :p

Offline Deth7

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 412
      • http://www.pigstompers.net
Poll: Complex Engine Management
« Reply #63 on: January 12, 2007, 11:14:45 PM »
um no:rolleyes:
EA Still Blows...AOL Still Sux

Offline Zwerg

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 125
Poll: Complex Engine Management
« Reply #64 on: January 13, 2007, 05:23:31 AM »
If I had a cockpit at home: yes

But I have only a keyboard: So it's no.

Offline Benny Moore

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1439
Poll: Complex Engine Management
« Reply #65 on: January 13, 2007, 05:49:56 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Edbert
They have cowl flaps and radiator flaps (in applicable rides) as well as mixture settings that we don't have.


Oh, I forgot about the cowl flaps and radiators.  But they do not have mixture settings for the majority of the aircraft that did in reality.

Offline SirLoin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5705
Poll: Complex Engine Management
« Reply #66 on: January 13, 2007, 06:13:16 AM »
Yes..I would like engine overheat like back in EAW days...was much fun.
**JOKER'S JOKERS**

Offline FBplmmr

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1012
Poll: Complex Engine Management
« Reply #67 on: January 13, 2007, 07:10:10 AM »
no... it would be like those british commando games where you gotta pack all  the guys lunchboxs before you go on a mission.  ...just a little too much

If im buzy with engine micromanagment when would i get time to run to fridge for another beer?

Offline Max

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7722
Poll: Complex Engine Management
« Reply #68 on: January 13, 2007, 07:21:19 AM »
Yes - but only for the La7 :rofl

Offline bj229r

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6728
Poll: Complex Engine Management
« Reply #69 on: January 13, 2007, 09:04:43 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Max
Yes - but only for the La7 :rofl


What he said---actually... engine NOT overheating or something after running it at 100% from takeoff for 20-30 min (or 19 min for you LA7 pukes):D  is a lil....I dunno, cartoonish--would be interesting tweak to the game I'd think
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers

http://www.flamewarriors.net/forum/

Offline Gumbeau

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 164
Poll: Complex Engine Management
« Reply #70 on: January 13, 2007, 09:41:01 AM »
Having done complex engine management in one of the most complex ones to manage without a flight engineer I can chime in a definite 'no'.

There isnt anything fun about.

Its remarkably similar to getting the temperature right in the bathtub faucet,  only the faucet has 12 knobs.

I'm not really sure why people believe they would enjoy this other than some sort of ego thing.

They must believe they would be so much better at it it would give them an advantage.

Here is a real life story about that.........

A friend of mine flew for a company that believed they could tweak some more efficiency from their Pratt and Whitney Wasp Jr. engines. So instead of following the established guidelines they routinely flew extra lean. They convinced their pilots that this was a good operating practice.

My friend bought into this and used to preach to me about it.

About 2 am on a morning nearly 20 years ago, my friend learned the fallacy of  this thinking.

He was hauling a load of hybrid chicks (of the chicken variety) from upstate New York down to Mexico. In Northern Louisiana the number one motor started losing power and quit. The number 2 engine would not develop enough power to maintain altitude.

My friend headed for the nearest airport but the plane was heavy and the number 2 motor was too damaged to develop full power.

An engine teardown of both engines later revealed extensive valve damage resulting from the loss of cooling from the fuel (excess fuel cools a reciprocating gasoline engine). This damage likely resulted in the failure of number one and likely contributed to the unavailable power to maintain altitude in number two.

At least the NTSB thought so.

My friend tried to land on a small road in the dark. He managed to to do so but the left wing struck a telephone pole.

My friend died in the resulting post crash fire.

All because he believed he could manage an engine better than anyone else.

Engine management isnt about the here and now. Its almost impossible to so badly mismanage the motor that it would fail on THAT flight. Managing a motor is about saving it for the next guy so it won't quit on him but you still get the mission done.

There are a few management tasks that if neglected could kill you like fuel tank selection or manifold heat but it isn't a big deal.

Certainly not 'fun'.

Not without lots of surrounding external factors.

If you wanna simulate some real flying in Aces High get rid of the autopilots and make the weather below 6000 feet lousy. Get rid of maps and make folks navigate (not that I'm advocating this stuff). The real fun in flying is flying the plane and navigating...not knob twiddling.

The real fun in AH is blowing things up while drinking with your virtual buddies.
« Last Edit: January 13, 2007, 09:43:08 AM by Gumbeau »

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
Poll: Complex Engine Management
« Reply #71 on: January 13, 2007, 09:54:18 AM »
my vote : NO and NEVER.


I checked your handle "benny" there is no score for the last 3 months.
So basicely you're a freeloader and want another options in AH for free.

Belch .

Offline Shuffler

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26819
Poll: Complex Engine Management
« Reply #72 on: January 13, 2007, 12:15:45 PM »
NO
80th FS "Headhunters"

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)

Offline Bodhi

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8698
Poll: Complex Engine Management
« Reply #73 on: January 13, 2007, 12:35:17 PM »
Widewing put it correctly.

I am here to have fun, not be a systems manager.

NO
I regret doing business with TD Computer Systems.

Offline T0J0

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1056
Poll: Complex Engine Management
« Reply #74 on: January 13, 2007, 12:51:05 PM »
NO

Its great how it is now.... WW2online I seem to remember has engine management of some sort, go over there and play with engines... Then when you want to dogfight come back over here...