« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Why no B-25?????  (Read 1357 times)

Offline megadud

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2935
Why no B-25?????
« Reply #15 on: February 07, 2007, 09:32:29 PM »
i think ball was thinking....i don't know what the hell he was thinking.

but he is retarded so maybe that has something to do with it.
Logged

Offline Tango

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1421
      • http://www.simpilots.org/
Why no B-25?????
« Reply #16 on: February 07, 2007, 09:32:36 PM »
Not having a B-25 in a WW2 sim is like not having the Zero in a Pearl Harbor movie.
Logged
Tango78
78th Razorbacks
Historical Air Combat Group

Offline Slash27

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12798
Re: Re: Re: Why no B-25?????
« Reply #17 on: February 07, 2007, 10:21:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Mark Luper
B-25 IS WWII or did you possibly read it wrong?

Mark


Ball was being a wise ass:D
Logged

Offline tedrbr

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1813
Why no B-25?????
« Reply #18 on: February 07, 2007, 11:01:40 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Fianna
I'd rather have an A-26 than a B-25, although both would be nice.



What he said!  Though.... not so much that second part....   :D
Logged

Offline Ball

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1827
Why no B-25?????
« Reply #19 on: February 08, 2007, 03:36:33 AM »
B-25 wasnt in WWII :mad:
Logged

Offline Keiler

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 314
Why no B-25?????
« Reply #20 on: February 08, 2007, 05:09:52 AM »
Logged

Offline blkmgc

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 940
Why no B-25?????
« Reply #21 on: February 08, 2007, 05:16:08 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ball
B-25 wasnt in WWII :mad:


uh....ooooo..k..:huh


Anywho, I'd take the defensive  armament of a B25 H for low attack opps anyday over the A20's speed. Adding in parafrags and skip bombs would just be a bonus. :D
Logged
Debdenboys.comAdministrator

Offline TexInVa

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 433
Why no B-25?????
« Reply #22 on: February 08, 2007, 05:19:15 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ball
B-25 wasnt in WWII :mad:


Are you sure you aren't thinking B-52?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-25_Mitchell


opps... too slow
Logged

Offline Tango

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1421
      • http://www.simpilots.org/
Why no B-25?????
« Reply #23 on: February 08, 2007, 05:31:38 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ball
B-25 wasnt in WWII :mad:


What did Doolittle and his men fly off that carrier?

http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/events/wwii-pac/misc-42/doolt-a.htm
Logged
Tango78
78th Razorbacks
Historical Air Combat Group

Offline NHawk

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1787
Why no B-25?????
« Reply #24 on: February 08, 2007, 05:56:57 AM »
All of the photos of Dolittle's raid were doctored to hide what they were really flying. The B25 never served in WWII, this is what they were actually flying...

Logged
Most of the people you meet in life are like slinkies. Pretty much useless, but still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
-------------------------------
Sometimes I think I have alzheimers. But then I forget about it and it's not a problem anymore.

Offline Ball

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1827
Why no B-25?????
« Reply #25 on: February 08, 2007, 06:54:02 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Tango
What did Doolittle and his men fly off that carrier?

http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/events/wwii-pac/misc-42/doolt-a.htm


I am nto good at trivia.  flying fortresses?
Logged

Offline SuperDud

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4589
Why no B-25?????
« Reply #26 on: February 08, 2007, 06:54:56 AM »
B29 flying fortresses?
Logged
SuperDud
++Blue Knights++

Offline Ball

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1827
Why no B-25?????
« Reply #27 on: February 08, 2007, 07:03:41 AM »
yea!! what ^he sed"!
Logged

Offline Laurie

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 753
Why no B-25?????
« Reply #28 on: February 08, 2007, 07:37:47 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Mark Luper
I beleive when the game was in it's infancy it was decided to come up with a "different" two engined bomber than the B-25. Seems like at the time everyone had a B-25, noone had the B-26. In fact, I remember thinking the B-26 would be the one to have vrs the B-25. Pyro agreed with that so we got the B-26. I'm not saying that I had anything to do with it, Pyro and I just happened to think the same thing at the same time.

I would like to see the B-25 but it is slower than the B-26 and not near as sexy ;)

Mark


our one is as sexy as bush senior sitting in a pool of molten lard, lol
Logged

Offline Mark Luper

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1626
Why no B-25?????
« Reply #29 on: February 08, 2007, 05:09:08 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Laurie
our one is as sexy as bush senior sitting in a pool of molten lard, lol


I've always heard that beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.

:)

Mark
Logged
MarkAT

Keep the shiny side up!
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »