All due respect, its the Danes that came up with the best wind generators on the planet - Vestas and NEG-Micon (now part of Vestas). These companies practically owe their success to the federal and state subsidies provided by the U.S. and California in the 80s. That was a time of the big "wind rush" and I agree, all kinds of crap was put up helter skelter in the windy passes of California, but the money from this allowed companies like Vestas and NEG-Micon to grow and mature their technology into what it is today.
Its very unlikely this would've happened if we had been relying completely on the free market.
The National Renewable Energy Lab in Golden, CO is responsible further R&D in wind energy, and helps companies with designs and testing of blades, gearboxes, etc. That's another thing the pure free market would not provide -- and you can bet other countries are helping their wind turbine manufacturers succeed too.
The free market does not ALWAYS drive invention. How did the free market do anything for the manned spaced program and the moon landing - and think of all the spinoff technology we got from that.
btw, the EPA has not shut most of the wind generators down. If you go to one of the passes like Tehachapi, or near Palm Springs, you will see thousands of wind turbines still spinning away.
I think the difference between our positions is that you prefer ONLY the free market to operate, while I maintain that in some cases the free market fails to operate in our best interest. In these cases then, government aid in the form of research assistance and outright subsidies is helpful to "prime the pump" of what we'd like to see take place.
Where you say government intervention has messed up markets, I would just add we should analyze what went wrong and not make the mistake again. But I wouldn't abandon the principle.
I am not afriad of them finding new oil - I think oil has many important uses so it is foolish to burn it, since it is not renewable. Not to mention the pollution from tailpipe emissions.