Author Topic: B29 And Sherman Tank  (Read 2326 times)

Offline BennyBeaver

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 239
B29 And Sherman Tank
« on: March 08, 2007, 12:56:29 PM »
the b29 a famous bomber...the enola gay...atom bombs...the super bomber
why dont we have it? its a very important role in WWII! Along with the sherman...that piece of crap...why dont we have it either!!!!!

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
B29 And Sherman Tank
« Reply #1 on: March 08, 2007, 12:58:57 PM »
No No and No. If we get a B29, we hear the, "Let's get a nuclear bomb!" threads. If we get a nuke we won't only lose our frame rates, yet miles and miles of terrain will just get nuked out of existance. It will mainly turn into a nuclear war than a game. The sherman? No, we don't need a weak tank added to the play-list.
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline BennyBeaver

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 239
B29 And Sherman Tank
« Reply #2 on: March 08, 2007, 12:59:50 PM »
they were important roles during WWII and for the  nukes no way!

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
B29 And Sherman Tank
« Reply #3 on: March 08, 2007, 01:00:39 PM »
The only thing people see important about a sherman or the B29 is the firepower.
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15859
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
Re: B29 And Sherman Tank
« Reply #4 on: March 08, 2007, 02:09:02 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by BennyBeaver
the b29 a famous bomber...the enola gay...atom bombs...the super bomber
why dont we have it? its a very important role in WWII! Along with the sherman...that piece of crap...why dont we have it either!!!!!



OMG. PLEASE read through the 48,463,731 threads about b29 before posting about it AGAIN

TY

-S
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com

Offline nirvana

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5640
B29 And Sherman Tank
« Reply #5 on: March 08, 2007, 02:23:06 PM »
I concur, bring the B29 to Aces High!  YEAHYA!
Who are you to wave your finger?

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15859
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
B29 And Sherman Tank
« Reply #6 on: March 08, 2007, 02:29:28 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by nirvana
I concur, bring the B29 to Aces High!  YEAHYA!




*_*    Well...[Dreaming]


Bishop: About to drop!
Wingman: Roger that...let er rip
[Bomb falling]
Rook: I hear something!
Another Rook: Yea, so do I
[Bomb Hits]
BA BA BAM
Rook:200: OMFG...I CANNOT BELIEVE THAT!
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com

Offline Wes14

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2996
B29 And Sherman Tank
« Reply #7 on: March 08, 2007, 02:32:54 PM »
:rofl

Yes to B-29..but no n00ks:noid
heck doesn't the B-29 hold like 40 normal bombs:O
Warning! The above post may induce: nausea, confusion, headaches, explosive diarrhea, anger, vomiting, and whining. Also this post may not make any sense, or may lead to the hijack of the thread.

-Regards,
Wes14

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15859
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
B29 And Sherman Tank
« Reply #8 on: March 08, 2007, 02:45:30 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Wes14
:rofl

Yes to B-29..but no n00ks:noid
heck doesn't the B-29 hold like 40 normal bombs:O



Wes...do you know the regular ord loadout of b29?

Id assume it would be...500 lbs like b17 but with being able to carry so many bombs...It bring me to them having 1000 lbs as their regular ord loadout

YES...I know they were not used much for regular bombing but...
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com

Offline Wes14

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2996
B29 And Sherman Tank
« Reply #9 on: March 08, 2007, 02:50:41 PM »
nope i dont know the normal bomb load out for the B-29 im just guessing cause it seems alot bigger then the bombers we got:noid
Warning! The above post may induce: nausea, confusion, headaches, explosive diarrhea, anger, vomiting, and whining. Also this post may not make any sense, or may lead to the hijack of the thread.

-Regards,
Wes14

Offline tedrbr

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1813
B29 And Sherman Tank
« Reply #10 on: March 08, 2007, 03:18:55 PM »
Typical loadout for many B-29 mission in the Pacific was 10,000 pounds of ord per plane.  Maximum Ord loadout was 20,000 pounds of ord per plane.

Problems with B-29:  
* This means, 1 flight of B-29's could take out HQ.
* B-29's had a ceiling of 33-35,000 feet in altitude.... not many planes here could intercept them up there.
* B-29 "I wanna noook" threads would become a daily whine.
* Haven't seen hard numbers yet, but a loaded B-29 weighs twice what loaded B-17's, B-24's, and Lancs do..... not sure if there is enough RUNWAY to get the B-29 off the ground in the arenas as things stand now.  That would mean redoing all the maps.
* Been stated numerous times for anyone able to use Search function in forums to see that the idea of a B-29 has been given a negative many times in the past.

Unless looking to add a perkable plane to the game, like the A-26B and A-26C Invaders
Invader thread link
then any bombers added to the game should try to fill out the plane sets for the Germans, Japanese, Russians, Italians, and British before adding yet another American plane to the plane set.  


As to Sherman.  The T-34 in-game is pretty close to the abilities of a Sherman already.  No .50 cal for AA use about the biggest difference, and maybe reload times.

There are better options to add to the game in the way of GV's.  A multi-use
option, something that could bring puffy ack to the players' control to engage bombers at altitude, add artillery to the game for indirect fire, and engage GV's at long range; maybe in the form of a German 88mm FlaK36 gun, might add more diversity?
Flak36 thread Link

But, these have been discussed before.... a few times......every month.......

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
B29 And Sherman Tank
« Reply #11 on: March 08, 2007, 04:01:35 PM »
I still remember when the B-29 threads were a daily hazard. Goodness I'm glad it's reduced a bit.
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline wstpt10

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 87
B29 And Sherman Tank
« Reply #12 on: March 08, 2007, 04:09:59 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Denholm
The only thing people see important about a sherman or the B29 is the firepower.


Er... Sherman firepower? Panzer IVGs have 80mm of frontal armor, the M3 75mm won't kill that at typical ranges we see in game.

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
B29 And Sherman Tank
« Reply #13 on: March 08, 2007, 04:10:59 PM »
Well, I heard somewhere that the sherman had a 80, or 95MM AP gun. Yet somehow that didn't hurt the tigers.
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline Wes14

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2996
B29 And Sherman Tank
« Reply #14 on: March 08, 2007, 04:22:53 PM »
no Shermans we need a Panther or This
that would kill a tiger:noid
Warning! The above post may induce: nausea, confusion, headaches, explosive diarrhea, anger, vomiting, and whining. Also this post may not make any sense, or may lead to the hijack of the thread.

-Regards,
Wes14