Originally posted by lazs2
bsd.. nooo... you should not give up and you should spred the word of your guy. It is not as to me as RPM..
RPM backed a loser that was also a socialist. I had good reason to give him a bad time and I did it on the basis of kinkies liberal socialist message and... the fact that he had no chance. I was very glad to see the guy get shot down in a big way.
ron pauls message is one I like...
that right there is a big part of why I reacted like I did to your earlier criticisms. From prior discussions I assumed you would like RP and would be on "our side" so to speak. There's plenty of people who disagree with Ron's message and actually think he would be a bad president, let them criticise and cast doubt. Coming from you I felt a little betrayed.
That does not change the fact that aside from a few cubicle dwelling libertarians and some individualists... no one will vote for him once he starts telling the average American just how much he is going to take away from them in goodies or how he wants to end the war on drugs or how he feels about the borders or... even abortion.
He will lose a big chunk every time he opens his mouth to answer a well thought out question.
I dunno. as to the WoD, there's a lot of people on both sides of the spectrum that see the futility and waste in that "war".
The loss of social welfare programs, I see that as a bigger potential stumbling block than his stance on the WoD.
His stance on abortion could be tricky, while he's personally very much pro-life (he's delivered over 4000 babies), on constitutional grounds he is against the fedgov being involved in any way in the matter. When he votes against federal funding of abortions he makes the pro-lifers happy, when he votes against a federal ban on abortions he makes the pro-choice crowd happy. he explains his stance in this article,
Federalizing Social Policy. The challenge will be in getting people to understand his constitutional reasoning.
The border issue I'm personally on the fence about. National defense is a constitutionally authorized power of the fedgov, and securing our boarders does seem to be in line with that. The flip side is that in one way or another, we're all no more a few generations away from being immigrants and the "America the Melting Pot" analogy is part of our national character. This is a tough one for me...