Originally posted by Bodhi
148 total aircraft... come on, this is a waste of time for HTC to be considering. There are far more variants that need representation than a very limited hardly standardised fighter!
"Very limited hardly standardized fighter" <-- this is why that statement was ignorant. It would be saying the same as "the model T was an insignificant vehicle" or "nobody knows how wings produce lift" -- by doing some reading you find that it just isn't true. Ignorance isn't an insult, it was a fact.
You quickly went on to impugne MY honor, without hesitation no less.
Originally posted by Bodhi
Even with 250 aircraft, it is a waste of time. (and if you care to look at the numbers cited they add up to aabout 250 aircraft)
As for calling me ignorant, I have a much better tendency to back up my statements with facts than your assumptions. So tread lightly.
Then after I provided accurate information you replied as such:
Originally posted by Bodhi
Krusty, the saddest thing here is that you are so full of caca del toro that you could not move unless a dung beetle picked you up and rolled you into a ball....
Come on and get a basic understanding. The G.55 was a too late, not enough produced, and DEFINITLEY not an impact on the war.
I am tired of listening to your inane rantings. You know crap all, your assumptions are flawed and you generally have no clue. That you have survived this long is proof that God has a heart for idiots.
and
Originally posted by Bodhi
you started with insults...
I finish.
Spin it how you like, you are still a factless imbecile.
and more:
Originally posted by Bodhi
What are you taking? Honestly, I want to see how the hell this turned into you being the victim? You came into this thread and called me ignorant. If that is not starting something, I really do not know wtf is.
I provided production figures put in place by your buddy Gianlupo. You want to argue that, talk to him. As for you saying that I am not listenening, I have seen your reasoning. You want the G.55 because it will have a chance for the Italians to fight and be competitive even though it was hardly a blip in the war. I have maintained it is such a limited production aircraft, that there are other more important aircraft that should go in game first.
The why the hell are you here telling me something different then... seriously, what are you on?
Misconception...? Again, what are you on?
The Ta152 saw about 50 examples produced and delivered... roughly. Thats 33% of the total number of G.55's that were delivered. The 109G6 saw roughly 11000 aircraft produced. It was the most common built 109. The G.55 total production (even counting aircraft not delivered and on assembly line) is 2.7% of the 109G6 production. The Ta152 total represents .4 % of the 109G6 production.
DING DING.... that logic of yours is FLAWED as usual. They were BOTH rare when compared to the 109G6.
You are not straight forward. You skew everything to your point of view. If you do not have a fact you make it up. Thats the number one problem with you and why people just can not stand to see you in a thread. Even when you are wrong you maintain your innocence and try to skew that into an attack on you.
Frankly I am very tired of you and your factless statements and spin.
Ohh, and the G.55 does not belong in the game. It was a limited number side show.
directly insulting and attacking me, for providing the same frakking info you did. P.S. this is your bogus numbers "apples and oranges" comparison.
Posts like this:
Originally posted by Bodhi
I am 100% not against adding Italian aircraft. If you want to add an Italian aircraft though, then add the CR.42 and SM.79.
Both served in significant numbers. Hell a CR.42 is in a museum over in England after it was shot down during the Battle of Britain.
That is the way it should be. Insignificant, hypothetical uber planes should have lower priority than the real in your face aircraft that were there and fought in numbers.
Don't lend you credibility and simply reinforce my "ignorance" statement. You simply lacked information on the G.55 almost completely. It had been posted many times by several people that the G.55 was not "hypothetical" nor was it "uber" nor was it "indignificant". You really had no idea what its stats were, it seemed. Otherwise you'd never have called it "uber" or "hypothetical" or "insignificant" (although you could qualify this last one with "in comparison to 'nation x')
I'm just going to paste your typical responses from "Vote no to g.55" and this thread.
Originally posted by Bodhi
1 day.... 1 month it doesn't matter to Krusty. He knows everything.
Originally posted by Bodhi
LOL,
See what I mean. The guy is so used to talking out his arse that he can not even support his own statements.
Pathetic.
Originally posted by Bodhi
I may be a griefer to you, but I am not a liar like you.
Originally posted by Bodhi
Throw insults? It seems to me that you were the one that started with the ignorance comment. Since then, you have been proven wrong on many if not most occasions on this discussion and that you talk out both sides of your mouth with completely opposite statements.
You want me to lay off, then admit you are wrong.
Originally posted by Bodhi
Lying... how about we just leave it as you know f all and that you talk out your butt.
I think that'd best close it.
sorry am drunk at breck, but could not resist.
Originally posted by Bodhi
You must consistently walk around with a blanket over your head.
And FYI, I never exploded, although... I seem to remember looking back a few threads with all your expletives being blanked out.
Nice try... actually not really, but believe what you want.
Have a nice day in your "little" world. 
Oh.. yes.. we can all see how you "never exploded"....
All of this in 2 related threads, yet when I call you out, and flat out say "show me where" -- you can't provide a single quote, a single example of anything that's wrong, a lie, etc. I haven't even insulted you, unless pointing out that you didn't read the info on the g.55 in the first place is an insult. You scanned the "number produced" and claimed it was a hypothetical insignificant uber plane. None of that holds up if you read page 1 of this thread. You simply grabbed the number and said "vote no" -- but then you said the other things which were wrong.
