New plane election

[BBBB]

Originally posted by Bubbajj
Sometimes the truth is ugly  

Sometimes ignorance is bliss.






-BB

[kanttori]

I hope that HTC is concentrating in the future to the early war planes as many people here have wished. I understand that the US players are interested in the late war planes, because USAF historically join to the war later than the other countries.

But here are hundreds of European plyers who wants to see all those early war Curtiss Hawks, Fiats, Morane Saulniers, Ratas, Migs, LaGGs etc. I am also one of them.

I can imagine the tight curving furballs with those agile fighters in the early war arena, CT, AvA and SEA. Wow!

[moot]

I can imagine big fat slugs nailing whatever comes after the P39

[Gianlupo]

Originally posted by Widewing

When we have massively produced aircraft missing, aircraft more significant to the war by far; don't you think they should be in the plane-set long before the much less significant types get in?

Yes, sure. But this isn't the policy HTC adopted, as we all can see from our current planeset... so why shouldn't I lobby for my plane, just like the Finns are doing? The Brewster hadn't an impact on WWII, too...

Btw, my Finnish friends.... why don't you throw away the B239??? We can join our forces and ask for another plane we both want.... the G.50!!!

[FrodeMk3]

Hey Pyro, since this is a preliminary list, can we add one?

Would like to add the I.A.R. 80/81. Would be a mid-war ride, to boot.

[Wmaker]

Originally posted by Gianlupo
The Brewster hadn't an impact on WWII, too...

How many planes the G.55 shot down?

[FDutchmn]

Originally posted by Pyro
Japanese fighter - Ki 44, J2M, Ki 45, or Ki 43 – There’s fun to be had here that most people don’t realize.  I have to group them together so as not to split the votes for people just wanting to see more Japanese planes but each of these are interesting in their own right.

ahhh I would vote for the Japanese fighter... but I would like a Japanese bomber too... and a Japanese torpedo.

[Martyn]

P-39, He111.

[mentalguy]

I would much rather have a player controled Destroyer, and possibly the Cruiser too. I love Naval battles.

[Spikes]

Originally posted by mentalguy
I would much rather have a player controled Destroyer, and possibly the Cruiser too. I love Naval battles.

OOOO, that would be cool...Wouldnt it be kinda useless though?

[Gianlupo]

Originally posted by Wmaker
How many planes the G.55 shot down?

I don't know! But they were all well trained American pilots, not poor Russian farmers!!! Now, please, russian friends, don't take offence at this, we're just poking fun at each other... isn't it Wmaker?

[mentalguy]

Originally posted by spikes
OOOO, that would be cool...Wouldnt it be kinda useless though?

people wouldnt need to use the whole task group to base rape the bases.

[Spikes]

ahhh, I see your point.


-S

[mora]

Brewster

[53gunner]

Ok Im drunk but I have heard enough! Obviously there has been to much desention amongst us over this. That is why I propose the the v2. everyone could use it. It would cost bomber perks. Just think"hey lets attack V6 I gonna launch 2 v2's get ready" Its easy to model. missile go up....missile come down. I feel this may be the best middle ground for this.
Im telling ya its what we need
Glenn