Originally posted by Kurt
SPOT ON THE MONEY.
Both of them are arguing a valid point, and it was set up by the network.. You see, thats why at the end, its all play nice. Its Schtick. And there is this whole crowd of idiots (and if any of you are members, sorry for the offence) who buy into this perverted 'FOX' version of reality where everyone screams and yells and no one makes a point.
If you believe O'reiley is about anything other than Bill's paycheck... You're a chump. If you believe Heraldo is about anything other than Heraldo's paycheck you're a chump.
Fox loves you chumps.
Other than Family guy and Simpsons, I don't have fox... If it ain't animation, its not on fox in my house. Fox is 5 steps worse than the anti-Christ.
True. but if you honestly think any of the other networks are any more honest or objective. Then I know of a pretty famous bridge I'd like to sell you at a pretty good price.
They all have their sctick. their own "version of reality".
The more I watch the networks the more inclined I am to beleive they ALL make up (spin)their own version of reality.
They ALL take the facts, And distort them. Often greatly. In order to tell the story THEY want told. To get their opinions across.
Objectivity in news reporting I am afraid is long gone.
Fox may be bad. but the rest are no better. They simply use a different style to get ratings.
Like a skilled politition they all spin their stories in a manner in which they feel their audiance wants to hear them. Actualities be damned
I hardly watch any of them any more. And when I do I usually flip between them.
They all sell spin.
Far as fair and balanced. I'd say MSNBC is the best at that.
But they are all 5 steps worse then the anti Christ.