Author Topic: ANY PLANS for Single Arena.. (Read 1649 times)

VISTTA · « **on:** April 08, 2007, 12:12:23 PM »

This has been gone over and over,,,but is there any plans fr the near Future to go back to a single arena again.?? High Tech should have known " if it aint broke, dont fix it"

Who likes to join arenas with only a range of 50 to 100 people in it...boring.......

Bring back the main arena people....

Lets vote on that before we vote on another plane... GAH!!!

VISTTA

Toad · « **Reply #1 on:** April 08, 2007, 12:24:38 PM »

Actually, I have been enjoying the MW with ~40 people in it very much, thank you.

I admit there are usually only about 10 of those engaged in good air combat at any one time, but that is sufficient to have a grand old time.

Guess not every one is alike, eh?

Widewing · « **Reply #2 on:** April 08, 2007, 12:32:36 PM »

The answer is "no", per HiTech.

It was broken; they fixed it.

Now, about 100 players get to fly in the EWA and MWA (combined), while the rest are divided between two LWAs, where you should be able to find something suitable. Plus there's still the AvA arena and the DA and TA.

What I see now is largely the break up the huge "super squads" that were unbalancing the single MA by focusing big numbers at any point.

I prefer it the way it is now, but I am getting rather tired of the same maps.

My regards,

Widewing

BBBB · « **Reply #3 on:** April 08, 2007, 12:42:18 PM »

Yes the map rotation is very stale. Small maps should be mixed in with large maps. I wouldnt mind seeing Trinity back in the rotation. That would be a huge change of pace.

-Sp0t

Max · « **Reply #4 on:** April 08, 2007, 01:37:01 PM »

Smells like rotten stink bait to me

TinmanX · « **Reply #5 on:** April 08, 2007, 02:00:48 PM »

Why don't people have the guts to ask these questions with their own accounts anymore? Why open a shade just to ask a question?

68slayr · « **Reply #6 on:** April 08, 2007, 02:05:07 PM »

i would really like to see ozkansas, trinity and donut every once in a while:D

Or if someone could do a remake of those but make it a little bit smaller:)

Yeager · « **Reply #7 on:** April 08, 2007, 02:14:18 PM »

I hope they never go back to that old childish mundane clusterlub of an arena setup again.

Long live the MW Arena!!!!!

And once the P39 comes online

REP0MAN · « **Reply #8 on:** April 08, 2007, 03:49:54 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by TinmanX
Why don't people have the guts to ask these questions with their own accounts anymore? Why open a shade just to ask a question?

Post says, IP Logged

I'll be Skuzzy could figure out who it was,

if he wanted to

Laurie · « **Reply #9 on:** April 08, 2007, 03:52:39 PM »

i had always been againts multiple arenas....
BUT
i can see why it was done and have grown to live with it, wouldnt waste breath in carrying on argueing

Vadjan-Sama · « **Reply #10 on:** April 08, 2007, 04:19:18 PM »

I am in agreement with this of multiple arenas, only in which I am not ok is the two main arenas and the limitor of users, by me taking 1 MA out or taking out the limitor would be a far better.

Well, thats I think.

thndregg · « **Reply #11 on:** April 08, 2007, 04:21:46 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by TinmanX
Why don't people have the guts to ask these questions with their own accounts anymore? Why open a shade just to ask a question?

Intardnet anonymity is a wonderful thing for those that can't say it to your face.

stickpig · « **Reply #12 on:** April 08, 2007, 04:28:21 PM »

things are great they way they are now. MW and EW planesets are equally matched.

Wish they would start rotating in the FT map though....map rotation is getting old

Karnak · « **Reply #13 on:** April 08, 2007, 04:30:28 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by TinmanX
Why don't people have the guts to ask these questions with their own accounts anymore? Why open a shade just to ask a question?

May not be a shade. Remember, only a very small number of players post on the forums. It could be that this guy never posted before but felt strongly enough about this to post for the first time.

It isn't like it is a contraversial question or anything.

TinmanX · « **Reply #14 on:** April 08, 2007, 04:42:56 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by REP0MAN
Post says, IP Logged

I'll be Skuzzy could figure out who it was,

if he wanted to

Aye, but they're logged within the post table meaning unless the Skuzster has built a search tool it'll be a long slog to find the real author, not to mention proxies and masking.

I always found logging IP addresses to be a waste of time.

Quote

Intardnet anonymity is a wonderful thing for those that can't say it to your face.

What's the point though? Anonymity is all fine and good, but as long as the question is phrased in a polite manner and follows the commandments, I've never known HTC to have a problem with it.