Author Topic: Sherman VC vs. T34/76, Tiger, Pnzr Info (Read 1908 times)

Larry · « **on:** April 12, 2007, 01:33:51 AM »

Hope Skuzzy doesn't move this so everyone can get this info. Hope it helps you GV guys out and gives you an idea to where to hit the evemy.

Edit: Here is WW2 Vehicle info URL

Serman VC Firefly

Weapon
76.2 mm2
Type of Ammunition
17 pdr (3") Mk IV, L/60
Weight
17lbs.
Velocity
2,980ft/sec
Thickness of armor penetrated
6"@30° at 100 yards
Armor Thickness (mm)
Front: 2"@46°
Side: 1.5"
Hull Front, Upper 50.8
Hull Sides, Upper 38.1
Hull Rear 38.1
Hull Top 19
Hull Bottom 12.7-25.4
Turret Front 3"
Turret Sides 2"
Turret Rear 50.8
Turret Top 25.4

T34/76

Weapon
76.2 mm F-34 L/42.5, L/41.51(1940 & 1942)
Type of Ammunition
BR-350A1 APHE
Weight
6.3 kg1
Velocity
2,150 ft/sec, 662 m/sec
Thickness of armor penetrated (range meters)
1M
90mm
500M
69mm
1000M
61mm
Armor Thickness (mm)
Hull Front, Upper 47
Hull Sides, Upper 40-45
Hull Rear 45
Hull Top 15-20
Hull Bottom 20
Turret Front 70
Turret Sides 52
Turret Rear 52
Turret Top 16

Tiger

Weapon
88 mm KwK 36 L/56
Weight
27.33 lb
Velocity
2,536ft/sec
Thickness of armor penetrated (range meters)
100
120
500
110
1000
99
1500
91
2000
84
2500
80
Armor Thickness (mm)
Hull Front, Upper 100
Hull Front, Lower 62@60°
Hull Sides, Upper 82
Hull Sides, Lower 62
Hull Rear 80
Hull Top 25
Hull Bottom 25
Turret Front 4"
Turret Sides 3.2"
Turret Rear 80
Turret Top 25

Panzer IV H

Weapon
75 mm KwK 40 L/48
Weight
18.22 lb
Velocity
2,428ft./sec
Thickness of armor penetrated (range meters)
100
99
500
91
1000
81
1500
72
2000
63
2500
?
Armor Thickness (mm)
Hull Front, Upper 80@10°
Hull Front, Lower 25
Hull Sides, Upper 30
Hull Sides, Lower 30
Hull Rear 20@8°
Hull Top 12@85°-90°
Hull Bottom 10@90°
Turret Front 2"
Turret Sides 1.2"
Turret Rear 30@15°
Turret Top 10@74°

E25280 · « **Reply #1 on:** April 12, 2007, 08:14:28 PM »

Link says page error.

Softail · « **Reply #2 on:** April 12, 2007, 08:56:07 PM »

pretty much you get a kill hitting a Sherman or Panzer almost anywhere when using a Sherman.

Hell, I hit a Sherman in the tracks (from the front) and killed it when hitting it from a Sherman.

I get very few richochets on Panzers from a Sherman.

I witnessed a Sherman killing a Tiger from 600 yards out with one shot.

T-34 angled armour on the front is no match for the Shermans gun out to 800 yards.

Sherman... great gun. Terrible armour.

Love the sound of the shell bouncing off the floor after the gun is fired. However, I have been hearing a LOT of double reports when firing the gun. The boom plays twice. Very confusing in TT.

Softail

ghi · « **Reply #3 on:** April 12, 2007, 09:19:10 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Softail

I witnessed a Sherman killing a Tiger from 600 yards out with one shot.

Softail

nothing new!
i witnessed a documentary movie on History about "WW2 best fighter "where P51 Mustang was the best #1 and Me262 was #7

john9001 · « **Reply #4 on:** April 12, 2007, 10:01:15 PM »

for the metric challanged, 6" of armor is 152mm

Larry · « **Reply #5 on:** April 13, 2007, 02:10:14 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by E25280
Link says page error.

Yes but when it loads up it has icons on the left sidebar. Click one to open a dropdown menu and so on.

Masherbrum · « **Reply #6 on:** April 13, 2007, 07:02:18 AM »

T3h Sherman VC was t3h bestest tank of WWII! It absalootlee domanated evreething that stood in it's path!

68slayr · « **Reply #7 on:** April 13, 2007, 07:05:55 AM »

i had a tigr taken out 1 shot from 1600 by a sherman

tigrs are next to worthless
HVAP shot for the T34s isn't what i thought it would be. Several times i have had to shoot shermans 3-4 times in the front armor from 400-600

Engine · « **Reply #8 on:** April 13, 2007, 07:22:08 AM »

Three richochets on a Sherman turret from my panzer at 600.

Larry · « **Reply #9 on:** April 13, 2007, 08:46:30 AM »

Thats the problem don't shoot thier turrets. One hit anywere else should kill them.

Lye-El · « **Reply #10 on:** April 13, 2007, 09:59:44 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by 68slayr
i had a tigr taken out 1 shot from 1600 by a sherman tigrs are next to worthless

Guess I should have burned those GV perkies...........

theNewB · « **Reply #11 on:** April 13, 2007, 10:22:01 AM »

Well I havent even botherd to up a tiger yet. The ones I see that do manage to live what maybe 5 seconds long if that guess Ill have a lot of perks unspend from now on until something else gets added thats more "uber"

Larry · « **Reply #12 on:** April 13, 2007, 10:25:17 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by theNewB
Well I havent even botherd to up a tiger yet. The ones I see that do manage to live what maybe 5 seconds long if that guess Ill have a lot of perks unspend from now on until something else gets added thats more "uber"

KING TIGER!!1!!1!1!!1!!! WITH A N00K ON ITS ROOF!!!!!1!1!111!1!!!!!!!!

hubsonfire · « **Reply #13 on:** April 13, 2007, 10:26:00 AM »

Killed a few tigers with 1 shot. That gun on the Firefly is wicked bad. I think the days of the perked Tiger are numbered.

Took a T34 up with the HVAP loadout. It'll kill tanks now, which is something I never had much luck with in the past. Don't know if that's necessarily due to the new ammo, or the tweaking of ballistics and armor, but it works.

715 · « **Reply #14 on:** April 13, 2007, 01:13:22 PM »

Quote

Took a T34 up with the HVAP loadout. It'll kill tanks now, which is something I never had much luck with in the past. Don't know if that's necessarily due to the new ammo, or the tweaking of ballistics and armor, but it works.

The old T34 AP was always able to kill Panzers and T34s if you hit the right spot at the right angle. It was never able to kill Tigers except at point blank with 9 rounds. The new HVAP can now kill Tigers at short range, including taking out the turret in one shot. However, it cannot easily kill the new Super Sherman, even at point blank range. So yes, I would say the Tiger will now be a hanger queen. (Or would that be a garage queen?)