Author Topic: Sustainable socialism... Boroda? (Read 604 times)

lazs2 · « **Reply #15 on:** May 02, 2007, 02:18:58 PM »

If it was so great then why did you need to build fences and walls with armed guards to keep people in?

lazs

Xargos · « **Reply #16 on:** May 02, 2007, 02:25:29 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by lazs2
If it was so great then why did you need to build fences and walls with armed guards to keep people in?

lazs

I think we need to let mexico become communist then.

soda72 · « **Reply #17 on:** May 02, 2007, 03:28:17 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Mr No Name
Trouble is, most socialists believe that communism, a very close cousin, only fails because the wrong people have tried it.

I thought the only difference between a socialist and a communist is that socialist can vote.

Vulcan · « **Reply #18 on:** May 02, 2007, 04:06:19 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Boroda
A country that got completely destroyed 2 times in last 100 years, got cut and divided

How about Germany, France, or Japan?

They got pummeled into rubble and got rebuilt better than before, and are now economic powerhouses.

Vudak · « **Reply #19 on:** May 02, 2007, 04:11:58 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Boroda

Problem is that we are naturally ineffective, climate and distances, "region of risky agriculture". We had the last mass-starvation in 1947 here... I mean - we are only 60 years away from mass hunger.

Speaking of mass starvations... What exactly did they teach you about the Great Famine in Ukraine?

1K3 · « **Reply #20 on:** May 02, 2007, 04:29:15 PM »

Scaninavian countries are the perfect example of sustainable socialism. They're all happy

lasersailor184 · « **Reply #21 on:** May 02, 2007, 04:52:43 PM »

The thing with all these utopian ideals, like Democracy, Socialism, Communism is that they can all work on a SMALL SCALE if the inhabitants so choose to follow them.

By small scale, I mean a smaller town at largest. One where you could walk in to any town and immediately know 80% of the people there.

But as the population gets bigger, so do the chances of screwing someone out of something.

Like take for example America, let's say a complete abortion ban was passed onto the constitution. The difference between screwing 150 million people out of the ability to choose to have an abortion could be 1 vote.

Yeager · « **Reply #22 on:** May 02, 2007, 08:38:56 PM »

What about all the mexicans illegally in our democracy demanding legal rights?

Whats that say about our system?

lasersailor184 · « **Reply #23 on:** May 02, 2007, 11:04:35 PM »

That we need to grow a pair of balls?

FiLtH · « **Reply #24 on:** May 03, 2007, 12:42:05 AM »

You do understand that the US was as afraid of you nukin us as you were of us nukin you?

BigGun · « **Reply #25 on:** May 03, 2007, 10:55:41 AM »

If I recall, Marxism was based on an evolution...

Industrialism---Capitalism----Socialism----Communism

Problem is they skipped a few important steps along the way.