Originally posted by Fishu
Someone crossing his fingers and hoping that nothing will happen doesn't make them any less soldiers though. They're far more legit targets than plain civilians.
*
doesn't know whether to laugh, or feel sorry for Fishu's ignorance*
Fishu, if this were a conventional war with an "honorable" army as the enemy, I
might agree. It is an unconventional war, with radical Islamist insurgents that we are fighting. They know they can never hope to beat a disciplined army, so they attack targets of opportunity to maximize headlines, and their agenda... They prefer to hit the unarmed, *
and in your case, unaware* civilian population for the terror aspect.
Tell me, is a country more likely to want to end a war if only its army is being killed, or are the citizens more likely to demand an end when they see their protectors cannot keep them safe?
What will get attention faster: A single attack on a military target? Or several simultaneous attacks on large concentrations of civilians at malls, schools, church?
These idiots won't quit until you are converted to Islam, or are dead. Period. And if you do convert, it will be so as a
third class subject in their skewed world. No privileges, perks, or special interest group will save you other than yourself, and our military.
The minority groups are trying to do this through lawsuits and special interest lobbyists. Islamist radicals are doing it with guns and bombs.
