« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Down

Author Topic: Comrade Clinton  (Read 1358 times)

Offline lasersailor184

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8938
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #15 on: May 30, 2007, 03:06:36 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
The question has to do with the increased inequity in salaries, not how much you make.


The solution lies in the understanding of supply and demand.

Once you understand that principle, you'll realize that there is no problem.  Except for the fact that YOU chose the wrong career so as to not capitalize on the demand for CEO's.
Logged
Punishr - N.D.M. Back in the air.
8.) Lasersailor 73 "Will lead the impending revolution from his keyboard"

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18827
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #16 on: May 30, 2007, 03:08:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
The question has to do with the increased inequity in salaries, not how much you make.


It is none of my business, I truly don't care. It is not a concern of the government in a free society nor should it be.
Logged
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13958
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #17 on: May 30, 2007, 03:37:46 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
Sounds like everyone is dodging the question.


Yes you are indeed dodging the question. That's nothing new for you however.

What is your idea of an equitable solution to your "problem"? I'm really interested in hearing how you plan to solve this.
Logged
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline x0847Marine

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1412
Re: Comrade Clinton
« Reply #18 on: May 30, 2007, 03:57:19 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
I think she should set an example, donating the majority of the Klintons net worth "for the common good".
 


And the bush should set a similar example by donating all the family $$ Prescott Bush earned by helping the Nazis. With the Clinton's and the bush both broke, maybe they'll both just go away and live happily ever after at the same trailer park downing billy beer and smoking meth.

Although Bill could make $$ in porn, " Watch Willie get slick; Jurassic pri_k" and the bush could drape lights over his head and rent himself out an an x-mas tree at the mall... he does have the intellect of a house fern, he'd be a great tree... so that's good.

Even if they keep all their cash, the bush & clinton families are "model citizens" we should all strive to emulate, we really need the best of both to run the country. Maybe Hillary should hook up with Jeb and run on a communist neo-clown platform that promises to start wars.
Logged

Offline lasersailor184

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8938
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #19 on: May 30, 2007, 04:08:53 PM »
Quote
Jewish Anti Defamation League (for some reason they are virulent Nazi haters...)
Rumors about the alleged Nazi "ties" of the late Prescott Bush, the grandfather of President George W. Bush, have circulated widely through the Internet in recent years. These charges are untenable and politically motivated.

Despite some early financial dealings between Prescott Bush and a Nazi industrialist named Fritz Thyssen (who was arrested by the Nazi regime in 1938 and imprisoned during the war), Prescott Bush was neither a Nazi nor a Nazi sympathizer.


Credit to Virgil.
Logged
Punishr - N.D.M. Back in the air.
8.) Lasersailor 73 "Will lead the impending revolution from his keyboard"

Offline VOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2313
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #20 on: May 30, 2007, 04:11:08 PM »
The only thing more disgusting than a Neocon is a limousine liberal.

Why can't these goons just leave people the F alone for a change?
Logged

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10169
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #21 on: May 30, 2007, 04:18:32 PM »
Sounds like everyone is dodging the question.
====
Oh my....well then....do I have a problem with people getting wealthy?

No.

Do I have a problem with corporate executives being paid good money for doing good work?

No.

Thats how it works for me...good work means salary raise.  

Heres another tidbit, I would rather have the life I do now, the ability to live my life how I want, waste my free time on whatever fancies me at the time, rather than be one of these 18-7-365 executives that have no life, no family time.  All they do is work,  Nope....I need to play.  They can have the big bucks.
Logged
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #22 on: May 30, 2007, 04:54:46 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lasersailor184
The solution lies in the understanding of supply and demand.

Once you understand that principle, you'll realize that there is no problem.  Except for the fact that YOU chose the wrong career so as to not capitalize on the demand for CEO's.


Hey look ...laser passed econ 101.



Sorry, but I think it would be better to return to the type of economic system backed by Teddy Roosevelt and espoused by Carnegie. But that's just liberal old me.
Logged

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #23 on: May 30, 2007, 05:27:25 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
Sorry, but I think it would be better to return to the type of economic system backed by Teddy Roosevelt and espoused by Carnegie. But that's just liberal old me.


Is that the system where Carnegie destroyed the union by hiring the Pinkertons?

Or maybe you refer to some more enlightened economic system...
Logged
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

storch

  • Guest
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #24 on: May 30, 2007, 05:38:25 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
Hey look ...laser passed econ 101.



Sorry, but I think it would be better to return to the type of economic system backed by Teddy Roosevelt and espoused by Carnegie. But that's just liberal old me.
or roosevelt prompting the laws such as the sherman anti trust act?  both roosevelts were communists.
Logged

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13958
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #25 on: May 30, 2007, 05:45:52 PM »
What specifically are you so enamored about from those two folks work? Last I heard Carnegie wasn't all that upset with his own wealth and he was rather well to do even by todays "standards".

How do you envision distributing other peoples wealth?

Oh, and to answer your particular question. In regards to any govt. action, no I'm not upset that CEO's are being paids lots of money. That's for the stockholders to deal with, not the Federal Government.



Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
Hey look ...laser passed econ 101.



Sorry, but I think it would be better to return to the type of economic system backed by Teddy Roosevelt and espoused by Carnegie. But that's just liberal old me.
Logged
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline Captain Virgil Hilts

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6138
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #26 on: May 30, 2007, 06:10:56 PM »
Liberals and socialists like Hilary feel that certain people's slices of the pie should be made smaller, so that other's slices can be made larger. Me, I figure we pay the REALLY smart people more so they can make the pie bigger for all of us.
Logged
"I haven't seen Berlin yet, from the ground or the air, and I plan on doing both, BEFORE the war is over."

SaVaGe

Offline RedTop

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5921
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #27 on: May 30, 2007, 06:22:55 PM »
I make 200 percent more now at my job than when I started. I worked hard to get here. Others can do the same.
Logged
Original Member and Former C.O. 71 sqd. RAF Eagles

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17775
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #28 on: May 30, 2007, 06:38:48 PM »
On the one hand
Yes some of us are making more then ever before. But if you really look at it. How many of us are able to afford more then we could before with that "more" we now make.
Some will say yes. others no
Im sure if analysed nation wide alot more would say no, then yes

The disparity between the haves and have nots is reaching the point of absurdity.
This type of situation historically never tends to end well or lead to good things happening. Eventually it reaches a breaking point and all hell breaks loose

ON THE OTHER HAND

In a free society.
Im not entirely sure it should be the governments job to overly regulate how wealth is distributed.
But rather policies in the way of incentives that encourage rather then mandate a more free flow of wealth to the have nots is probably better.

The government already does this with states for highway funding Can you say "Click it or Ticket" or "Zero Tolerance for Agressive Drivers Week"?

Dont for a minute think that the states really give a damn about your safety.
It all about the federal money they dont get if tickets arent issued

One thing is for sure.
Like it or not at some point something will have to be done.
Because the nations fiscal health as a whole has to be a top priority for the government. And not only the fiscal health of the top earners.

But the more and more I look at the world.
the more I am starting to be inclined to think we might be better off with a WWIII. Wipe the slate clean and start over from scratch.

Or as someone here once so elequently put it.
"Sometimes I go outside at night and wonder. Where the hell is that damn asteroid"
Logged
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline Charon

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3705
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #29 on: May 30, 2007, 06:39:18 PM »
Quote
or roosevelt prompting the laws such as the sherman anti trust act? both roosevelts were communists.


I would disagree. Anti trust laws and enforcement allow us to have a free market at all. Standard Oil abused its power and market position to artificially dominate the market, for example, by shutting competitors out of the rail system. Hard to compete on price or quality if you are physically strong armed out of the market. I might be a bit biased though, since the magazine I now edit was the only independent voice in the oil industry at the time leading the opposition to  Standard Oil :)

IMO, the laxness of the FTC in the past decade where mergers and acquisitions have been concerend has been very detrimental to our economy long term.


Charon
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Up
« previous next »