Author Topic: Comrade Clinton  (Read 1371 times)

Offline lasersailor184

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8938
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #45 on: June 07, 2007, 09:45:24 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Holden McGroin
Robin Hood did not steal from the rich and give to the poor.  He retrieved the tax money that the Sherrif and the Prince took from the peasants and gave it back to the peasants.  

Robin Hood was a tax cutter.


The original story of Robin Hood did that.  But it's current iterations are a socialist's wet dream.
Punishr - N.D.M. Back in the air.
8.) Lasersailor 73 "Will lead the impending revolution from his keyboard"

Offline AWMac

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9251
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #46 on: June 08, 2007, 12:51:37 AM »
Ohhh C'mon you heartless people... B & H Clinton has a child. They need to provide for.  Chelsie could never make it on her own without the taxpayers assisting. Where are your Hearts at?

Just where are your Hearts?

Sad isn't it?



Mac



Free America!!!
« Last Edit: June 08, 2007, 12:53:47 AM by AWMac »

Offline PanzerIV

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 742
      • http://17thawsquad.aowc.net/main.asp
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #47 on: June 08, 2007, 01:13:43 AM »
Ya know alot of Americans now dont make as much maney as they could because of 1 thing. :OLAZYNESS:O . Yes, many Americans suffer from it.

Offline AWMac

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9251
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #48 on: June 08, 2007, 01:25:11 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by PanzerIV
Ya know alot of Americans now dont make as much maney as they could because of 1 thing. :OLAZYNESS:O . Yes, many Americans suffer from it.


Spell Check would have prevented you from looking stupid.

:p

Mac

Offline Gunthr

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3043
      • http://www.dot.squat
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #49 on: June 08, 2007, 07:05:42 AM »
Quote

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 1965, the average corporate chief executive earned 24 times as much as the average worker, she said. By 2005, it was 262 times as much. In the last six years, productivity has increased, but family incomes have gone down, she said, leading to rising inequality and pessimism in the work force.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



So you all don't see this as a problem? - MT


i don't.  and i don't believe the government has any authority under the constitution to require "equality" of income.  "Inequality" has got to be the most loaded buzzword in modern times.
"When I speak I put on a mask. When I act, I am forced to take it off."  - Helvetius 18th Century

Offline Shuckins

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3412
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #50 on: June 08, 2007, 08:01:14 AM »
Well, Hillary's views on government control of the economy certainly aren't new.  Nor are they subject to any form of ongoing modification or development.  They are fully formed and largely unchanged since she was a bespectacled nerd at Wellesley, where she first hitched a ride on the socialist bandwagon.

Yet, the real danger of Hillary's views lies not in the desire to control the excesses of the free-enterprise system, but in the lengths to which she is willing to go to curb those excesses.  No doubt, she sees herself as a latter day Teddy Roosevelt;  a modern Progressive who will achieve the socialist goal of egalitarianism through the redistribution of "unfairly" acquired wealth.

To achieve this goal, she employs class warfare and envy, although it is doubtful that she sees or recognizes her actions as being such.  The danger in using class envy to achieve political and economic goals is that it is a two-ton monster that never stops growing and requires constant feeding.  That is the problem with even the most well-intentioned and benign of wealth redistribution programs;  those on the receiving end develop a sense of entitlement, and demand more and more as time goes by.  

So, she will "rein in" the evil, corrupt influence of corporate America and throttle "special interests", only to turn control of the government over to voracious sectors of the electorate motivated by class envy and yet another form of greed.  Those who work hard for greater personal profits wil be rewarded with confiscatory tax rates established by a government attempting to feed the monster, and ensure it's own reelection.

Given eight years under her leadership, the government will be well on the way to killing the goose that laid the golden egg.

She will achieve her vision of egalitarianism....and all we have to do is give up our individuality.

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #51 on: June 08, 2007, 09:50:15 AM »
there should be a free market.  In order to have a free market you have to have an open market.  In the example given by charon..  you have extortion and blackmail.  those would and should be illegal in a free market.

If the powerful acme mousetrap company threatened a small retail store with being locked out if they carried a competitors product then the retail store/competitor would sue and win in court.  It is not difficult..  It does not account for corruption tho.

In the past..  workers were shot by police and even government troops at the behest of big buisiness.. this was of course all illegal.   The idea of anti trust is to prevent the companies from getting powerful enough to buy the government which in itself always gravitates toward the illegal and corruption.  

The idea of anti trust is a cynical one... it says that anyone with enough money can buy the government and that after that it will be a partnership of business and government to enslave the individual..

Socialism says essentialy that slavery is freedom... that the only way to assure freedom is at the point of a governments gun... no one individual can have power other than the government.  the people can not be an armed threat to the government and business must be under the control of the government.

The idea that there is a disparity in wages now that is due to some robber baron business practice is not a very sound one...

How bout... if you want to get ahead... don't have more babies than you can take care of?   How bout... Don't get married unless you plan on not getting divorced.   The divorce industry has bankrupted millions...  most houses on the auction block are because of divorce..  

How bout the government do it's real job and protect individual rights and put an end to frivolous lawsuits?   muzzle their real masters.. the lawyers.

and crocket...   most politicians leave with more money than they came in with... it is just more distasteful when the likes of the socialist klintons tell the rest of us that they are gonna sock it to the cheating rich and pass it all out like robin hood.

Hell.. not like robin hood.. robin hood took from an oppressive government that taxed it's people to death and gave em back their own damn money... we need that kind of robin hood not a klinton.

It is proven over and over that the more you lessen the tax burden the more the people prosper... yet... the klintons and their democratic socialist insist on selling the message that we can tax ourselves into prosperity.   That other peoples stupid decisons and choices are our responsibility...

lazs

Offline 68ZooM

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6337
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #52 on: June 08, 2007, 11:28:38 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Yeager
Sounds like everyone is dodging the question.
====
Oh my....well then....do I have a problem with people getting wealthy?

No.

Do I have a problem with corporate executives being paid good money for doing good work?

No.

Thats how it works for me...good work means salary raise.  

Heres another tidbit, I would rather have the life I do now, the ability to live my life how I want, waste my free time on whatever fancies me at the time, rather than be one of these 18-7-365 executives that have no life, no family time.  All they do is work,  Nope....I need to play.  They can have the big bucks.
 

They deceided that money was more vaulable than the Kids,  the Family time and so on, the trend seems to be how much money they can make at the costs of Family time and their Kids, I dont not feel sorry for them sense THEY made the choice of money over Family Values.

Let me ask you how much is enough money? Money brings Power and most seem to "enjoy" there Power
UrSelf...Pigs On The Wing...Retired

Was me, I bumped a power cord. HiTEch

Offline WaspR2800

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #53 on: June 08, 2007, 01:00:55 PM »
"We are going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good"

                          - Hillary Clinton, born again communist.

Offline Curval

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11572
      • http://n/a
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #54 on: June 08, 2007, 01:21:04 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sabre
Yep.  Socialism runs deep in her veins.  Her thesis back in college was essentially a socialist manifesto, or at least that's what's been suggested.  No way to find out, since the University (at Hillary's request) won't release a copy to the public.  That in itself speaks volumes.  


This is silly.

Hell, I did a degree in Political Science and at the start I wrote my papers the way I felt.  That was right up until I was failed on one question in an exam for giving my opinion on Quebec separatism.  My answer included the withdrawl of all Canadian Government funding and the building of a big wall around Quebec with razor wire on top.  The guy marking the exam called me xenophobic.  I had to look it up because I'd never heard of the word back then.  :)

After that I wrote exactly what the profs wanted to hear and was INVITED to join the masters program in Political Science because my grades were so good.

If you read them you would think I am a communist too.

Plus, you are accusing someone of something with no proof and nothing but pure speculation.
Nice.
Some will fall in love with life and drink it from a fountain that is pouring like an avalanche coming down the mountain

storch

  • Guest
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #55 on: June 08, 2007, 01:42:04 PM »
xenophobe, pink short wearing scooter driving cigarette smoking poster on very obscure bbs.

I hope that helps

Offline Odee

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2718
      • 49th Fighter Group
Comrade Clinton
« Reply #56 on: June 08, 2007, 02:06:41 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by OdinGrunherze
I'm glad, that I'm not the only one who notices these things....

OG
AMEN!

Have to find the political bumper sticker web site and post link... They got all kinds of pics like the above with snappy catch phrases.  Eagle, you may have found a second career ;)
~Nobodee~   Get Poached!
Elite: Dangerous ~ Cmd Odeed

http://www.luxlibertas.com/